Wiki - Bugs/Responses

[C de-Avillez]

On Fri, 2010-06-11 at 10:40 -0500, Micah Gersten wrote:
> On 06/11/2010 09:18 AM, C de-Avillez wrote:
> > On Fri, 2010-06-11 at 00:27 -0500, Drew Cross wrote:
> >> I think that the Wiki page:
> >> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Responses
> >> needs to have an entry added to it about normal apport bug reports 
> >> submitted about crashes needing to be submitted as a crash report, 
> >> examples of bugs that needed this type of response are:
> >> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/592416
> >> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/590285
> > 
> > 
> > Er. Like, say, 
> > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Responses#Missing%20a%20crash%20report%20or%20having%20a%20.crash%20attachment ?
> > 
> > :-)
> > 
> > Cheers, and thank you for helping.
> > 
> 
> I asked him to post to the list.  The problem with that response is that
> it basically tells people to permanently enable apport.  Here is what I
> normally use for a one time crash:
> - ----------------
> Thank you for reporting this to Ubuntu. Could you please generate an
> apport crash report for this?
> You can enable apport for one instance like this:
> sudo service apport start force_start=1
> 
> I am marking this invalid as apport will open a new bug when the crash
> is generated. If it does not, you can reset the status of this one to
> New and we will try something else.
> - ----------------
> I figured that maybe the two could be merged into a better response.

Ah, OK, makes sense now. Yes, by all means, lets get it done

Drew -- would you mind updating the response? If in doubt, you can
always propose a change here (the ML) or on the #ubuntu-bugs channel.
Also, sorry for my misunderstanding.

..C..
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-bugsquad/attachments/20100611/e1304f59/attachment.pgp