Bugs since release

Mackenzie Morgan macoafi at gmail.com
Wed Apr 29 05:56:27 BST 2009


On Martes 28 Abril 2009 11:12:07 PM Brian Murray wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 02:48:44PM -0400, Mackenzie Morgan wrote:
> > On Martes 28 Abril 2009 2:20:03 PM Brian Murray wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 02:15:16PM -0400, Andrew wrote:
> > > > You might want to consider filtering out bugs with sync or merge in
> > > > the title. As bugs reported by developers (by way of bug-control
> > > > membership) have a higher gravity, syncs are being shown as some of
> > > > the "gravest" bugs in the report. Yet, they are not very interesting
> > > > from a triaging/bugsquad stand point.
> > > 
> > > Is there a particular reason they are in the New or Confirmed status?
> > 
> > Laziness...or people having better things to do than twiddle status to and 
> > fro.
> 
> Considering that Ubuntu is a large project with a lot of bugs and
> volunteers triaging those bugs, its important that a bug task's status
> get twiddled to one that accurately reflects the state of the bug.  This
> ensures that the bug will show up on appropriate lists and multiple
> people won't misspend time on it. 

Does it matter as much if the person is also self-assigning at the same time?

-- 
Mackenzie Morgan
http://ubuntulinuxtipstricks.blogspot.com
apt-get moo
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-bugsquad/attachments/20090429/7462a24d/attachment.pgp 


More information about the Ubuntu-bugsquad mailing list