Bugs with status 'In Progress' without assignee

Wolfger wolfger at gmail.com
Sat May 24 19:23:37 BST 2008


On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 8:03 AM, Reinhard Tartler <siretart at ubuntu.com> wrote:
>
> According to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Status, bugs with status 'In
> Progress' "should" have an assignee. According to
> http://tinyurl.com/5mvws2 there are currently about ~200 of such bugs.
>
> I clearly don't see the point in having such bugs. Could you please give
> me a valid use case for this?
>
> If there is none, I suggest to set all of them to triaged.

Only reason I can see for this is that "in progress" is a status
anybody can use, and "triaged" is not. Still, I don't think it's
proper to have a bug "in progress" without an assignee.

-- 
Wolfger
http://wolfger.wordpress.com/

My 5 today: #90080 (macchanger), #150557 (linux-source-2.6.20), #75818
(linux-source-2.6.15), #68329 (pbuilder), #185480 (octave3.0)
Do 5 a day - every day! https://wiki.ubuntu.com/5-A-Day



More information about the Ubuntu-bugsquad mailing list