needs-packaging Example

Wolfger wolfger at gmail.com
Fri Jun 13 14:18:01 UTC 2008


On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 5:16 AM, Reinhard Tartler <siretart at ubuntu.com> wrote:
>
> Please note that needs-packaging bugs should never be set to 'incomplete'
> to prevent bug expiry. There is really no point in expiring
> needs-packaging bugs, at some point someone will or will not package
> it.

I agreed with this when I first read it, but (of course) when I
decided to look at some needs-packaging bugs today, I found one which
I felt really did deserve it. Or perhaps it shouldn't have been a
"needs-packaging" bug in the first place? ;-)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/devil/+bug/130239

-- 
Wolfger
http://wolfger.wordpress.com/

My 5 today: #69019 (nfs-utils, gnat-gps, update-manager), #194279
(linux-source-2.6.22), #191055 (firefox), #73390 (kipina), #137584
(sane-backends)
Do 5 a day - every day! https://wiki.ubuntu.com/5-A-Day




More information about the Ubuntu-bugsquad mailing list