From rouben at rouben.net Mon Jan 1 10:40:29 2007
From: rouben at rouben.net (Rouben)
Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2007 05:40:29 -0500
Subject: Bug triaging... backwards!
Message-ID: <daf11bd20701010240u1e62c48cw412a9cbfdbb241c1@mail.gmail.com>
Hello folks!
I'm a relatively new addition to the Ubuntu bug squad as well as this
mailing list, so please go easy on me if I'm being silly. :-)
The reason why I'm posting this is because when reviewing untriaged
bugs today, I noticed that some of the bugs on "last" page were over a
year old! Given the huge number of untriaged bugs, would it be prudent
to advise folks to start triaging bugs oldest to youngest? If so, then
perhaps the appropriate BugSquad triaging wiki pages should also be
changed.
Just a thought...
P.S. Happy 2007 everyone!
Rouben
From pandisv at yahoo.co.uk Mon Jan 1 13:03:09 2007
From: pandisv at yahoo.co.uk (Vassilis Pandis)
Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2007 13:03:09 +0000 (GMT)
Subject: Bug triaging... backwards!
In-Reply-To: <daf11bd20701010240u1e62c48cw412a9cbfdbb241c1@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <805446.61085.qm@web25004.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
--- Rouben <rouben at rouben.net> wrote:
> Hello folks!
>
> I'm a relatively new addition to the Ubuntu bug squad as well as this
> mailing list, so please go easy on me if I'm being silly. :-)
Welcome!
>
> The reason why I'm posting this is because when reviewing untriaged
> bugs today, I noticed that some of the bugs on "last" page were over a
> year old! Given the huge number of untriaged bugs, would it be prudent
> to advise folks to start triaging bugs oldest to youngest? If so, then
> perhaps the appropriate BugSquad triaging wiki pages should also be
> changed.
>
Well this is a compromise. Taking a look at older bugs is definitely needed
but we wouldn't want to miss on important new issues that affect the next
release. imVho, I think that the best approach is to focus mainly on new bugs
but dedicate some time to old bugs as well. After all, if an old bug is very
important, it won't be forgotten because sooner or later a duplicate will appear :-)
Vassilis
Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
From k.nielsen81 at gmail.com Tue Jan 2 11:32:55 2007
From: k.nielsen81 at gmail.com (Kenneth Nielsen)
Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 12:32:55 +0100
Subject: Bug triaging... backwards!
In-Reply-To: <daf11bd20701010240u1e62c48cw412a9cbfdbb241c1@mail.gmail.com>
References: <daf11bd20701010240u1e62c48cw412a9cbfdbb241c1@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <bcd436210701020332g39c4c655rb0b5bf6e22449eb@mail.gmail.com>
It is mentioned as one of the things bug-triaging consist of on this page:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/HelpingWithBugs
Regards TLE
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-bugsquad/attachments/20070102/21c29893/attachment.html>
From matthew.revell at canonical.com Tue Jan 2 17:27:28 2007
From: matthew.revell at canonical.com (Matthew Revell)
Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2007 17:27:28 +0000
Subject: Bug notification emails - apology
Message-ID: <459A9600.5090302@canonical.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
Over the Christmas break, Launchpad stopped sending bug notification
emails.
I'm sorry for the inconvenience that this has caused you. We've found
the bug responsible and will have the fix rolled out by Thursday (4th Jan).
We have pretty good quality control but obviously it wasn't thorough
enough for us to catch this bug before the Christmas holiday. We're now
reviewing how we test changes to Launchpad and will implement a new QA
process for the bug mail system.
I'm glad to say that no data was lost. You may not receive notification
of all bug changes straight away, though, as we are currently looking at
the best way to process the backlog.
Again, I'm sorry that we haven't given you the service you expect.
If you have any questions, please reply to this email or find me in
#launchpad on irc.freenode.net.
Thanks.
- --
Matthew Revell - talk to me about Launchpad
IRC: matthewrevell, #launchpad on irc.freenode.net
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFFmpX/DlVeK9f+A+oRAuBqAJ0S6rm0685tP3mI74M+w//jhG6ALgCgppWD
xxGNaoJicgX3uu9MvCLlJYc=
=6PBW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
From henrik at ubuntu.com Wed Jan 3 13:00:07 2007
From: henrik at ubuntu.com (Henrik Nilsen Omma)
Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2007 14:00:07 +0100
Subject: bughelper now knows -A
In-Reply-To: <1166902591.9664.2.camel@lovegood>
References: <1166902591.9664.2.camel@lovegood>
Message-ID: <459BA8D7.8000808@ubuntu.com>
Daniel Holbach wrote:
> Hellas!
>
> bughelper will now searches in attachments too, if you pass it the -A
> option. It's all in ~dholbach/bughelper/bughelper.dev - Henrik, if
> you're happy, please merge into ~bugsquad/bughelper/bughelper.main
>
Great work Daniel!
(I need to read more python to keep up :) )
There were a few problems dealing with URLs though. time to start
tracking bugs on bughelper I think:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bughelper/+bugs
Henrik
From matthew.revell at canonical.com Wed Jan 3 14:46:39 2007
From: matthew.revell at canonical.com (Matthew Revell)
Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2007 14:46:39 +0000
Subject: Bug notifications flowing again
Message-ID: <459BC1CF.1010606@canonical.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
I'm pleased to say that Launchpad's bug status notification emails are
now flowing again!
We've started to send out the backlog of bug notifications. When you
receive them, you may notice that there is one email per bug, no matter
how many status changes there have been. To reduce the number of emails
you receive, we have collated all the information about one bug into the
same email.
I'm sorry that we haven't given you the service that we should. As a
result of the problem, we have now improved our quality control.
If you have any questions, please email me or find me in #launchpad on
irc.freenode.net.
- --
Matthew Revell - talk to me about Launchpad
IRC: matthewrevell, #launchpad on irc.freenode.net
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFFm8HPDlVeK9f+A+oRAnazAKC2Y4DNHvOsIqpL5jerElDOlsZJkACdFqUE
eLk2UPL6tEGm6a1+C/vIwaY=
=h6te
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
From daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com Wed Jan 3 14:47:32 2007
From: daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com (Daniel Holbach)
Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2007 15:47:32 +0100
Subject: bughelper now knows -A
In-Reply-To: <459BA8D7.8000808@ubuntu.com>
References: <1166902591.9664.2.camel@lovegood> <459BA8D7.8000808@ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <1167835652.5951.3.camel@lovegood>
Hello,
On Mi, 2007-01-03 at 14:00 +0100, Henrik Nilsen Omma wrote:
> Great work Daniel!
Thanks a lot. I'm happy it seems useful to you. :-)
> There were a few problems dealing with URLs though. time to start
> tracking bugs on bughelper I think:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bughelper/+bugs
Good to see the issue reported is already resolved. Could you set the
"Bug Contact" and "Driver" of 'bughelper' to 'bugsquad'?
(https://launchpad.net/bughelper)
Thanks a lot, have a nice day,
Daniel
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-bugsquad/attachments/20070103/163b4e79/attachment.sig>
From henrik at ubuntu.com Wed Jan 3 20:57:54 2007
From: henrik at ubuntu.com (Henrik Nilsen Omma)
Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2007 21:57:54 +0100
Subject: bughelper now knows -A
In-Reply-To: <1167835652.5951.3.camel@lovegood>
References: <1166902591.9664.2.camel@lovegood> <459BA8D7.8000808@ubuntu.com>
<1167835652.5951.3.camel@lovegood>
Message-ID: <459C18D2.9020008@ubuntu.com>
Daniel Holbach wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Mi, 2007-01-03 at 14:00 +0100, Henrik Nilsen Omma wrote:
>
>> Great work Daniel!
>>
>
> Thanks a lot. I'm happy it seems useful to you. :-)
>
Yeah, I've been using it a bit today to have a go a grub-related bugs in
ubiquity. See: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingUbiquity/DupCandidates
I feel a bit bad about hammering Launchpad via HTTP (until I remember
that they still need to send us some XML sample files :) -- Matthew?)
Being able to output and input again a list of bug numbers to bughelper
would alleviate much this. Example: first do a search for 'GrubInstaller
failed with code 1' then search those (including attachments) for 'The
file /boot/grub/stage1 not read correctly', say.
I've started a wishlist page here:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/BugHelper/Dev/WishList
>
> Good to see the issue reported is already resolved. Could you set the
> "Bug Contact" and "Driver" of 'bughelper' to 'bugsquad'?
>
Done.
Henrik
From towsonu2003 at gmail.com Wed Jan 10 23:04:01 2007
From: towsonu2003 at gmail.com (t u)
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 18:04:01 -0500
Subject: [Fwd: New Triage/Development Team MozillaTeam]
Message-ID: <45A570E1.7090102@gmail.com>
I think this didn't go to the bugsquad list:
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: New Triage/Development Team MozillaTeam
Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2007 16:34:44 -0600
From: David Farning <dfarning at gmail.com>
To: ubuntu-devel at lists.ubuntu.com
I would like to announce the formation of a new triage/development team.
The Mozillateam can be found at https://launchpad.net/~mozillateam.
Let's get some folks together who are interested in triaging Firefox and
friends for Ubuntu.
At https://bugs.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/+packagebugs we have over 800
open issue reports. Ouch. Maybe the world renowned bugsquad can throw
some love our way next bugday.
A request ticket is in for some mailing lists; ubuntu-mozillateam and
ubuntu-mozillateam-bugs. We will have a place to discuss all of those
pesky details that keep popping up.
IRC ubuntu-mozillateam
Wiki pages are underway at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam.
Please think of this as mozillateam-0.01 releasing early and releasing
often.
Thanks,
David
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-bugsquad/attachments/20070110/5db9d59b/attachment.sig>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: file:///tmp/nsmail-1.asc
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-bugsquad/attachments/20070110/5db9d59b/attachment.asc>
From freddymartinez9 at gmail.com Thu Jan 11 00:16:12 2007
From: freddymartinez9 at gmail.com (Freddy Martinez)
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 00:16:12 +0000
Subject: [Fwd: New Triage/Development Team MozillaTeam]
In-Reply-To: <45A570E1.7090102@gmail.com>
References: <45A570E1.7090102@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <d854a83a0701101616u1f7920aek54a65219d88d4142@mail.gmail.com>
Going along with what David said, we are looking for new members and have an
upcoming IRC meeting on Thursday January 11th, 17 UTC. Please feel free to
come, give ideas, etc. We are really going to be focusing on building the
team, internal policies, bug management ideas, and more. It shouldn't take
more than an hour.
#ubuntu-mozillateam.
On 1/10/07, t u <towsonu2003 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I think this didn't go to the bugsquad list:
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: New Triage/Development Team MozillaTeam
> Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2007 16:34:44 -0600
> From: David Farning <dfarning at gmail.com>
> To: ubuntu-devel at lists.ubuntu.com
>
> I would like to announce the formation of a new triage/development team.
> The Mozillateam can be found at https://launchpad.net/~mozillateam.
>
> Let's get some folks together who are interested in triaging Firefox and
> friends for Ubuntu.
>
> At https://bugs.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/+packagebugs we have over 800
> open issue reports. Ouch. Maybe the world renowned bugsquad can throw
> some love our way next bugday.
>
> A request ticket is in for some mailing lists; ubuntu-mozillateam and
> ubuntu-mozillateam-bugs. We will have a place to discuss all of those
> pesky details that keep popping up.
>
> IRC ubuntu-mozillateam
>
> Wiki pages are underway at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam.
>
> Please think of this as mozillateam-0.01 releasing early and releasing
> often.
>
> Thanks,
> David
>
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQBFnYEEMVVks401GcsRAkGBAKCVUdISuXh9uCyLbS6MxRHSRMc52ACfUO36
> EQ1+32GuRPWOIYQXbqbGud4=
> =yIbp
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
> --
> ubuntu-devel mailing list
> ubuntu-devel at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
>
>
>
> --
> Ubuntu-bugsquad mailing list
> Ubuntu-bugsquad at lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugsquad
>
>
>
--
Freddy Martinez
Kubuntu. GNU / Linux for human beings.
www.chi.ubuntu-us.org
</message>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-bugsquad/attachments/20070111/8652452f/attachment.html>
From gnomefreak at gmail.com Thu Jan 11 18:37:44 2007
From: gnomefreak at gmail.com (John Vivirito)
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 13:37:44 -0500
Subject: Mozilla Team
Message-ID: <45A683F8.5070007@gmail.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
This is an anouncment of a new Ubuntu team that is rising. We are the
Ubuntu-mozillateam. We are here to triage mozilla bugs, and just all
around lighten the load of mozilla related bugs being reported. If you
would like to learn more i will list some links for you to look at and
see if this is a team you would like to join. We are in
#ubuntu-mozillateam on irc.freenode.net to answer any questions you
might have about the team or the bugs we work with. If you feel this
team is for you please feel free to join us on
https://launchpad.net/~mozillateam. Thank you for your time.
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Membership
https://launchpad.net/~mozillateam
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam
- --
GnomeFreak
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/JohnVivirito
https://launchpad.net/people/gnomefreak
http://freewebs.com/ubuntufreak
Linux User# 414246
Ubuntu User# 8175
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFFpoP3qig4QTwcPCoRAnc/AJ41WrX5UG7BkZBEzVAlwFsrU9g0BACcCofp
uYQk4yJi1BdQTfjykKPilLM=
=7teC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
From sistpoty at ubuntu.com Fri Jan 12 02:21:14 2007
From: sistpoty at ubuntu.com (Stefan Potyra)
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 03:21:14 +0100
Subject: new team: motu-swat
Message-ID: <200701120321.16788.sistpoty@ubuntu.com>
Hi folks,
a bad security bug coming along your way? Starting to feel insecure?
Then it's time to call for the all new motu-swat, the police of universe, who
will squish all security bugs and thus make universe a safer place.
Our upcoming missions can be found at [1].
For all bug triagers: please subscribe us to all security bugs for *universe*
packages.
Cheers,
Stefan and the rest from motu-swat.
--
[1]: https://launchpad.net/~motu-swat/+subscribedbugs
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-bugsquad/attachments/20070112/95334299/attachment.sig>
From daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com Fri Jan 12 17:43:23 2007
From: daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com (Daniel Holbach)
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 18:43:23 +0100
Subject: bughelper knows new cluefiles!
Message-ID: <1168623803.25226.6.camel@lovegood>
Hello everybody,
as I mentioned before [1], I wanted to start working on implementing the
new clue files format [2] for bughelper and a good part of the work has
landed in ~dholbach/bughelper/bughelper.dev
What currently works is combinations of and, or, not and the general
parsing of XML files. The old info.old format is obsolete now.
What NOT works is: inheritance of bug clues (although they are parsed
already) and 'general clues', where we'll need to think of altering the
format a bit.
We should start working on documentation, so we can start using it for
real life bug triage soon.
Once someone has reviewed the changes, please merge into
~bugsquad/bughelper/bughelper.main
[1] https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-bugsquad/2006-December/000205.html
[2] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/BugHelper/Dev/ClueFiles
Thanks alot, have a nice day,
Daniel
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-bugsquad/attachments/20070112/6f3cb729/attachment.sig>
From ubuntu at alexm.org Fri Jan 12 20:52:06 2007
From: ubuntu at alexm.org (Alex Muntada)
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 21:52:06 +0100
Subject: bughelper knows new cluefiles!
In-Reply-To: <1168623803.25226.6.camel@lovegood>
References: <1168623803.25226.6.camel@lovegood>
Message-ID: <20070112215139.eldGr.alexm@alexm.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
* Daniel Holbach <daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com>:
[2007-01-12 18:43:23 +0100]
> We should start working on documentation, so we can start using
> it for real life bug triage soon.
>
> Once someone has reviewed the changes, please merge into
> ~bugsquad/bughelper/bughelper.main
Daniel,
I'd really like to help you with this because I think it can
be very helpful for bug triaging. Unfortunately, I don't
have the skills to start working on it and there are things
that I don't understand quite well.
Since that is probably happening to more people (the lack of
responses to your several calls for help seems to confirm this)
I was wondering if you would mind to make an #ubuntu-classroom
meeting to teach us by example... wdyt?
- --
Alex Muntada <alexm at alexm.org>
http://alexm.org/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iD8DBQFFp/TxLdxCGS3zaBERAsXVAKC+BwetVs5lXYh0gtKW02sX1YbwYACgrkOG
wrn2u3/p5717rM+Xtr+3TsA=
=y2BZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
From henrik at ubuntu.com Sat Jan 13 15:56:54 2007
From: henrik at ubuntu.com (Henrik Nilsen Omma)
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 16:56:54 +0100
Subject: bughelper knows new cluefiles!
In-Reply-To: <20070112215139.eldGr.alexm@alexm.org>
References: <1168623803.25226.6.camel@lovegood>
<20070112215139.eldGr.alexm@alexm.org>
Message-ID: <45A90146.4040703@ubuntu.com>
Alex Muntada wrote:
> Daniel,
> I'd really like to help you with this because I think it can
> be very helpful for bug triaging. Unfortunately, I don't
> have the skills to start working on it and there are things
> that I don't understand quite well.
>
> Since that is probably happening to more people (the lack of
> responses to your several calls for help seems to confirm this)
> I was wondering if you would mind to make an #ubuntu-classroom
> meeting to teach us by example... wdyt?
>
>
Good idea. I know Daniel will be working on some general documentation
for bughelper. I'm currently writing a step-by-step tutorial that I'll
post in a day or two.
Henrik
From henrik at ubuntu.com Sat Jan 13 20:46:57 2007
From: henrik at ubuntu.com (Henrik Nilsen Omma)
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 21:46:57 +0100
Subject: bughelper knows new cluefiles!
In-Reply-To: <45A90146.4040703@ubuntu.com>
References: <1168623803.25226.6.camel@lovegood> <20070112215139.eldGr.alexm@alexm.org>
<45A90146.4040703@ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <45A94541.2060002@ubuntu.com>
Henrik Nilsen Omma wrote:
> Good idea. I know Daniel will be working on some general documentation
> for bughelper. I'm currently writing a step-by-step tutorial that I'll
> post in a day or two.
>
In fact, here it is now:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/BugHelper/Tutorial
Henrik
From henrik at ubuntu.com Sat Jan 13 21:04:31 2007
From: henrik at ubuntu.com (Henrik Nilsen Omma)
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 21:04:31 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79133] RFE: Option to count comments
References: <20070113210431.25421.78854.malonedeb@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070113210431.25421.78854.malonedeb@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Public bug reported:
This can be used to find high-traffic bugs or untriaged bugs without any
comments
-k for kount perhaps?
May want to rank the bugs by number of comments in the output.
** Affects: bughelper (upstream)
Importance: Wishlist
Status: Unconfirmed
** Changed in: bughelper (upstream)
Importance: Undecided => Wishlist
--
RFE: Option to count comments
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79133
From henrik at ubuntu.com Sat Jan 13 21:09:55 2007
From: henrik at ubuntu.com (Henrik Nilsen Omma)
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 21:09:55 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79136] RFE: Last comment by <LP ID>
References: <20070113210955.5477.88446.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070113210955.5477.88446.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Public bug reported:
I'd like to find the bugs where:
- I made the last comment -- If I combine this with a date I can find those bugs where I requested more info but got no reply
- The submitter made the last comment -- The sumbitter has provided more info but no one has replied to her
- The package maintainer -- May have said something very wise about abut that I want to read
** Affects: bughelper (upstream)
Importance: Wishlist
Status: Unconfirmed
** Changed in: bughelper (upstream)
Importance: Undecided => Wishlist
--
RFE: Last comment by <LP ID>
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79136
From henrik at ubuntu.com Sat Jan 13 21:59:55 2007
From: henrik at ubuntu.com (Henrik Nilsen Omma)
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 21:59:55 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79140] Rank bugs by number of dupes
References: <20070113215955.5371.39011.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070113215955.5371.39011.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Public bug reported:
When starting work to triage an unfamiliar package it is useful to start
by looking at the bugs most likely to have dupes.
** Affects: bughelper (upstream)
Importance: Wishlist
Status: Unconfirmed
** Summary changed:
- Rank bugs by number of dupes
+ RFE: Rank bugs by number of dupes
** Changed in: bughelper (upstream)
Importance: Undecided => Wishlist
--
RFE: Rank bugs by number of dupes
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79140
From henrik at ubuntu.com Sat Jan 13 22:09:28 2007
From: henrik at ubuntu.com (Henrik Nilsen Omma)
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 22:09:28 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79143] RFE: more search criteria
References: <20070113220928.25372.69034.malonedeb@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070113220928.25372.69034.malonedeb@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Public bug reported:
* date related:
* Bug filed before <date>
* Last post entered before <date>
* Bug filed before <dapper>
* Last post entered before <dapper>
* attachment related
* only those with[out] attachments
* attachments named 'syslog' (or whatever)
* with patches
* Certain file types (like screenshots)
* Automatically unpack logs in tar or zip files
** Affects: bughelper (upstream)
Importance: Wishlist
Status: Unconfirmed
** Changed in: bughelper (upstream)
Importance: Undecided => Wishlist
--
RFE: more search criteria
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79143
From henrik at ubuntu.com Sat Jan 13 22:05:36 2007
From: henrik at ubuntu.com (Henrik Nilsen Omma)
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 22:05:36 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79142] RFE: Read and write text files with bug numbers
References: <20070113220536.5477.55657.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070113220536.5477.55657.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Public bug reported:
I would be useful to get bug # output as a list of plain numbers, HTML
formatted URLs or Wiki links on the form {{{[http://url bug #<num>]}}}
for easy cut and paste to the wiki.
bughelper should also be able to read these files as input. That way you
can work on a subset of bugs and then narrow it down further with
different searches, add remove bugs manually from the list or email it
to someone for further analysis.
** Affects: bughelper (upstream)
Importance: Wishlist
Status: Unconfirmed
** Changed in: bughelper (upstream)
Importance: Undecided => Wishlist
--
RFE: Read and write text files with bug numbers
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79142
From henrik at ubuntu.com Sat Jan 13 22:24:58 2007
From: henrik at ubuntu.com (Henrik Nilsen Omma)
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 22:24:58 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79147] Source package search name validation
References: <20070113222458.5477.51468.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070113222458.5477.51468.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Public bug reported:
if you execute the search bugnumbers foo and nothing is returned there
is no indication if that is because there is no source package named foo
or if there are no bugs. Ideally package names would be suggested.
** Affects: bughelper (upstream)
Importance: Undecided
Status: Unconfirmed
--
Source package search name validation
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79147
From henrik at ubuntu.com Sat Jan 13 22:22:22 2007
From: henrik at ubuntu.com (Henrik Nilsen Omma)
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 22:22:22 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79146] RFE: Caching of downloaded attachments
References: <20070113222222.25421.62872.malonedeb@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070113222222.25421.62872.malonedeb@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Public bug reported:
To improve performance and reduce the strain on Launchpad
** Affects: bughelper (upstream)
Importance: Wishlist
Status: Unconfirmed
** Changed in: bughelper (upstream)
Importance: Undecided => Wishlist
--
RFE: Caching of downloaded attachments
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79146
From henrik at ubuntu.com Sat Jan 13 22:38:38 2007
From: henrik at ubuntu.com (Henrik Nilsen Omma)
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 22:38:38 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79148] RFE: Make bughelper case-insensitive by default
References: <20070113223838.25421.15173.malonedeb@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070113223838.25421.15173.malonedeb@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Public bug reported:
And possibly make an option to be case sensitive. When you are looking
for user-generated text you never know how it will be capitalised. IMO
false positives are less bad than missed matches in this case.
** Affects: bughelper (upstream)
Importance: Wishlist
Status: Unconfirmed
** Changed in: bughelper (upstream)
Importance: Undecided => Wishlist
--
RFE: Make bughelper case-insensitive by default
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79148
From henrik at ubuntu.com Sat Jan 13 22:41:07 2007
From: henrik at ubuntu.com (Henrik Nilsen Omma)
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 22:41:07 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79150] Don't dupe on multiple finds
References: <20070113224107.25421.98996.malonedeb@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070113224107.25421.98996.malonedeb@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Public bug reported:
When a clue definition matches several times in a bug record, perhaps in
the comment *and* in an attachment, bughelper should still only list
that bug once
** Affects: bughelper (upstream)
Importance: Undecided
Status: Unconfirmed
--
Don't dupe on multiple finds
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79150
From henrik at ubuntu.com Sat Jan 13 22:47:04 2007
From: henrik at ubuntu.com (Henrik Nilsen Omma)
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 22:47:04 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79151] support global clues
References: <20070113224704.25421.5806.malonedeb@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070113224704.25421.5806.malonedeb@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Public bug reported:
Some clues are very common across all packages. You may want to search
for bugs with core dumps, screenshots, filed by a certain person,
whatever.
This can be solved by inheritance into a bug clue file, but that
requires that file to exist and the include statement to be there. With
truly global clues I could type:
bughelper -c g_core_dump gok
to find all the bugs in which gok caused a core dump, without there even
being a clue file for gok. a global.info clue file would suffice.
** Affects: bughelper (upstream)
Importance: Undecided
Status: Unconfirmed
--
support global clues
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79151
From henrik at ubuntu.com Sat Jan 13 22:58:23 2007
From: henrik at ubuntu.com (Henrik Nilsen Omma)
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 22:58:23 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79157] RFE: support local clue files
References: <20070113225823.25421.58908.malonedeb@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070113225823.25421.58908.malonedeb@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Public bug reported:
It would be useful to be able to read in local clue files in addition to
or instead of the bundled ones.
Many triagers will use bughelper in a semi-interactive way, inventing
clues as they go along sifting bugs. Some of these may be generally
useful, others not.
bughelper -r mycluefile.info packagename
could read the contents of my clue file and process it together with the
standard one for the package, while
-R mycluefile.info
would use only that local clue file and skip the standard one.
This would also allow for a fairly efficient and tidy way of adding to
the global bug info data. Once a triages has made a clue or set of clues
that he/she thinks might be useful to others it can be uploaded as an
attachment to a bug in malone for bughelper and the maintainers can roll
it in at their leisure.
** Affects: bughelper (upstream)
Importance: Wishlist
Status: Unconfirmed
** Changed in: bughelper (upstream)
Importance: Undecided => Wishlist
--
RFE: support local clue files
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79157
From daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com Sun Jan 14 09:09:31 2007
From: daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com (Daniel Holbach)
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 10:09:31 +0100
Subject: bughelper knows new cluefiles!
In-Reply-To: <45A94541.2060002@ubuntu.com>
References: <1168623803.25226.6.camel@lovegood>
<20070112215139.eldGr.alexm@alexm.org> <45A90146.4040703@ubuntu.com>
<45A94541.2060002@ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <1168765771.18880.20.camel@lovegood>
Hello,
On Sa, 2007-01-13 at 21:46 +0100, Henrik Nilsen Omma wrote:
> In fact, here it is now:
>
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/BugHelper/Tutorial
Thanks a lot Henrik! Good work!
Have a nice day,
Daniel
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-bugsquad/attachments/20070114/63d54802/attachment.sig>
From daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com Sun Jan 14 09:18:49 2007
From: daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com (Daniel Holbach)
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 10:18:49 +0100
Subject: bughelper meeting (was Re: bughelper knows new cluefiles!)
In-Reply-To: <20070112215139.eldGr.alexm@alexm.org>
References: <1168623803.25226.6.camel@lovegood>
<20070112215139.eldGr.alexm@alexm.org>
Message-ID: <1168766329.18880.29.camel@lovegood>
Hey Alex,
On Fr, 2007-01-12 at 21:52 +0100, Alex Muntada wrote:
> I'd really like to help you with this because I think it can
> be very helpful for bug triaging.
Thanks a lot for the assessment. I'm very happy if this proves to be
helpful for us.
> Unfortunately, I don't
> have the skills to start working on it and there are things
> that I don't understand quite well.
In general: Please ask all your questions on the list, because everybody
will read them and we'll have answers which are archived for everybody.
> Since that is probably happening to more people (the lack of
> responses to your several calls for help seems to confirm this)
> I was wondering if you would mind to make an #ubuntu-classroom
> meeting to teach us by example... wdyt?
I'm happy to do that. We can try to do a focused Q&A session on IRC on
Thursday Jan 18th on #ubuntu-bugs on irc.freenode.net at 15:00 UTC.
Please bear in mind that bughelper is still at a VERY early stage and
that things you'd like to have in it are not even thought of yet. I'm
convinced that this session will probably help out to
* understand where we are
* how things work that are implemented already
* which way we'll go in the future
* which documentation we still need to write
* where spots for involvement are
* what processes we need for development
Please try to think of good questions and answers in advance and let's
have a productive meeting!
Have a nice day,
Daniel
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-bugsquad/attachments/20070114/27ca14aa/attachment.sig>
From daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com Sun Jan 14 09:43:36 2007
From: daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com (Daniel Holbach)
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 09:43:36 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79133] Re: RFE: Option to count comments
References: <20070113210431.25421.78854.malonedeb@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070114094336.5371.75815.malone@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Thanks for the suggestion.
What do you want the output of
-k ubiquity
to be?
1) Number of comments of ALL ubiquity bugs, WITHOUT clues
2) Number of comments of ALL ubiquity bugs, WITH clues
3) Number of comments of just ubiquity the ubiquity bugs that are clues about
** Changed in: bughelper (upstream)
Status: Unconfirmed => Needs Info
--
RFE: Option to count comments
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79133
From daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com Sun Jan 14 09:51:59 2007
From: daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com (Daniel Holbach)
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 09:51:59 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79140] Re: RFE: Rank bugs by number of dupes
References: <20070113215955.5371.39011.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070114095159.25372.6141.malone@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Thanks for your suggestion. Do you want to list ALL bugs and rank by
number of dupes or just the ones that bughelper has clues about?
** Changed in: bughelper (upstream)
Status: Unconfirmed => Needs Info
--
RFE: Rank bugs by number of dupes
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79140
From daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com Sun Jan 14 09:50:45 2007
From: daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com (Daniel Holbach)
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 09:50:45 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79136] Re: RFE: Last comment by <LP ID>
References: <20070113210955.5477.88446.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070114095045.5371.23544.malone@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Thanks for your suggestion. Does "-lc <LP ID>" sound good?
** Changed in: bughelper (upstream)
Status: Unconfirmed => Needs Info
--
RFE: Last comment by <LP ID>
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79136
From daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com Sun Jan 14 09:55:12 2007
From: daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com (Daniel Holbach)
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 09:55:12 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79142] Re: RFE: Read and write text files with bug numbers
References: <20070113220536.5477.55657.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070114095512.25421.1825.malone@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Thanks for the suggestion.
Does -rw (read wiki) and -ww (write wiki) sound good?
** Changed in: bughelper (upstream)
Status: Unconfirmed => Needs Info
--
RFE: Read and write text files with bug numbers
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79142
From daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com Sun Jan 14 10:04:16 2007
From: daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com (Daniel Holbach)
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 10:04:16 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79148] Re: RFE: Make bughelper case-insensitive by default
References: <20070113223838.25421.15173.malonedeb@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070114100416.25372.34175.malone@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Thanks for the suggestion, this sound good.
We need a command line switch for that.
** Changed in: bughelper (upstream)
Status: Unconfirmed => Confirmed
** Tags added: bitesize
--
RFE: Make bughelper case-insensitive by default
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79148
From daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com Sun Jan 14 10:02:51 2007
From: daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com (Daniel Holbach)
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 10:02:51 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79146] Re: RFE: Caching of downloaded attachments
References: <20070113222222.25421.62872.malonedeb@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070114100251.25372.19915.malone@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
This needs clever planning.
** Changed in: bughelper (upstream)
Status: Unconfirmed => Confirmed
** Tags added: attachments cache
--
RFE: Caching of downloaded attachments
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79146
From daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com Sun Jan 14 10:00:47 2007
From: daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com (Daniel Holbach)
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 10:00:47 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79143] Re: RFE: more search criteria
References: <20070113220928.25372.69034.malonedeb@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070114100048.5477.67331.malone@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Thanks for the suggestions.
I suppose it'd be better to split this up in separate bug reports.
Things worth noting nonetheless:
* we need some sort of command line interface for this
* <before dapper> might be a bit tricky to solve, as we now still have people running breezy and filing bugs. we might just say "ok, dapper was released on ..... - all bugs after that date are 'dapper bugs'", which should be fine for the majority I guess
* file types meaning the file extension (*.jpg) or a content-type (text/plain), both?
** Changed in: bughelper (upstream)
Status: Unconfirmed => Needs Info
** Tags added: attachments search
--
RFE: more search criteria
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79143
From daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com Sun Jan 14 10:01:56 2007
From: daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com (Daniel Holbach)
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 10:01:56 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79142] Re: RFE: Read and write text files with bug numbers
References: <20070113220536.5477.55657.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070114100156.25421.54083.launchpad@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
** Tags added: io wiki
--
RFE: Read and write text files with bug numbers
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79142
From daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com Sun Jan 14 10:02:17 2007
From: daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com (Daniel Holbach)
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 10:02:17 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79140] Re: RFE: Rank bugs by number of dupes
References: <20070113215955.5371.39011.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070114100217.5477.91713.launchpad@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
** Tags added: htmlparsing ranking
--
RFE: Rank bugs by number of dupes
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79140
From daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com Sun Jan 14 10:10:30 2007
From: daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com (Daniel Holbach)
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 10:10:30 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79157] Re: RFE: support local clue files
References: <20070113225823.25421.58908.malonedeb@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070114101030.25372.96039.malone@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Thanks for the suggestions - a good idea.
Maybe -r and -R could also take a directory as argument.
Instead of
bughelper -r mycluefile.info packagename
maybe
bughelper -r <package>.info
or
bughelper -r <dir>
would suffice too?
** Changed in: bughelper (upstream)
Status: Unconfirmed => Needs Info
** Tags added: io
--
RFE: support local clue files
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79157
From daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com Sun Jan 14 10:12:26 2007
From: daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com (Daniel Holbach)
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 10:12:26 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79150] Re: Don't dupe on multiple finds
References: <20070113224107.25421.98996.malonedeb@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070114101226.5371.28557.malone@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Thanks for the bug report.
** Changed in: bughelper (upstream)
Status: Unconfirmed => Confirmed
--
Don't dupe on multiple finds
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79150
From daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com Sun Jan 14 10:11:09 2007
From: daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com (Daniel Holbach)
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 10:11:09 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79147] Re: Source package search name validation
References: <20070113222458.5477.51468.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070114101109.25372.26597.malone@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Good idea.
** Changed in: bughelper (upstream)
Status: Unconfirmed => Confirmed
** Tags added: bitesize
--
Source package search name validation
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79147
From daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com Sun Jan 14 10:11:59 2007
From: daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com (Daniel Holbach)
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 10:11:59 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79147] Re: Source package search name validation
References: <20070113222458.5477.51468.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070114101159.25372.33535.malone@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Maybe use python-apt for that.
--
Source package search name validation
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79147
From daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com Sun Jan 14 10:16:08 2007
From: daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com (Daniel Holbach)
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 10:16:08 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79151] Re: support global clues
References: <20070113224704.25421.5806.malonedeb@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070114101608.5477.80289.malone@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Thanks for the suggestion.
This would need the 'clue nick' to be implemented.
** Changed in: bughelper (upstream)
Status: Unconfirmed => Confirmed
--
support global clues
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79151
From daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com Sun Jan 14 11:39:52 2007
From: daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com (Daniel Holbach)
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 11:39:52 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79136] Re: RFE: Last comment by <LP ID>
References: <20070113210955.5477.88446.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070114113952.25372.66569.launchpad@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
** Tags added: commandline
--
RFE: Last comment by <LP ID>
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79136
From daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com Sun Jan 14 11:39:28 2007
From: daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com (Daniel Holbach)
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 11:39:28 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79133] Re: RFE: Option to count comments
References: <20070113210431.25421.78854.malonedeb@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070114113928.5477.48062.launchpad@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
** Tags added: commandline
--
RFE: Option to count comments
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79133
From daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com Sun Jan 14 11:41:35 2007
From: daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com (Daniel Holbach)
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 11:41:35 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79151] Re: support global clues
References: <20070113224704.25421.5806.malonedeb@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070114114135.25421.13534.launchpad@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
** Tags added: commandline
--
support global clues
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79151
From daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com Sun Jan 14 11:41:07 2007
From: daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com (Daniel Holbach)
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 11:41:07 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79157] Re: RFE: support local clue files
References: <20070113225823.25421.58908.malonedeb@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070114114107.5477.96070.launchpad@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
** Tags added: commandline
--
RFE: support local clue files
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79157
From daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com Sun Jan 14 11:40:51 2007
From: daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com (Daniel Holbach)
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 11:40:51 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79148] Re: RFE: Make bughelper case-insensitive by default
References: <20070113223838.25421.15173.malonedeb@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070114114051.5477.2017.launchpad@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
** Tags added: commandline
--
RFE: Make bughelper case-insensitive by default
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79148
From daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com Sun Jan 14 11:40:27 2007
From: daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com (Daniel Holbach)
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 11:40:27 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79142] Re: RFE: Read and write text files with bug numbers
References: <20070113220536.5477.55657.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070114114027.5477.77742.launchpad@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
** Tags added: commandline
--
RFE: Read and write text files with bug numbers
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79142
From daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com Sun Jan 14 11:40:23 2007
From: daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com (Daniel Holbach)
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 11:40:23 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79143] Re: RFE: more search criteria
References: <20070113220928.25372.69034.malonedeb@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070114114023.5371.51257.launchpad@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
** Tags added: commandline
--
RFE: more search criteria
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79143
From daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com Sun Jan 14 11:58:30 2007
From: daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com (Daniel Holbach)
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 11:58:30 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79215] RFE: port command line parsing to something sane
References: <20070114115830.5477.44398.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070114115830.5477.44398.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Public bug reported:
The command line parsing in ./bugHelper/commandLine.py is pretty naïve
at the moment. We need to port it to something sane to make the code
maintainable.
Things we can investigate:
- native python support for doing that
- glib python bindings (think GOption in C)
- something else.
** Affects: bughelper (upstream)
Importance: Undecided
Status: Unconfirmed
** Tags added: commandline
--
RFE: port command line parsing to something sane
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79215
From daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com Sun Jan 14 12:05:27 2007
From: daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com (Daniel Holbach)
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 13:05:27 +0100
Subject: [bughelper] Wanted: Command Line Zoo Director
Message-ID: <1168776327.5418.5.camel@lovegood>
Hello everybody,
as bughelper is growing and feature requests are coming up, which is a
*very* good sign, we need somebody to take care of the command line
interface.
I started writing https://wiki.ubuntu.com/BugHelper/Dev/CommandLineZoo
to try to make sense out of what we have today and what we want soon.
It'd be great if somebody of you stepped up and thought about what we
could do to improve the future user experience of bughelper. We need a
Command Line Visionary to make the use consistent and approve and
consider future command line switches.
I also filed an RFE bug to fix up the command line parsing, which is
pretty wonky at the moment: https://launchpad.net/bughelper/+bug/79215
Have a nice day,
Daniel
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-bugsquad/attachments/20070114/1e198d0a/attachment.sig>
From daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com Sun Jan 14 12:07:17 2007
From: daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com (Daniel Holbach)
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 13:07:17 +0100
Subject: bughelper meeting (was Re: bughelper knows new cluefiles!)
In-Reply-To: <1168766329.18880.29.camel@lovegood>
References: <1168623803.25226.6.camel@lovegood>
<20070112215139.eldGr.alexm@alexm.org>
<1168766329.18880.29.camel@lovegood>
Message-ID: <1168776437.5418.7.camel@lovegood>
Hello again,
On So, 2007-01-14 at 10:18 +0100, Daniel Holbach wrote:
> * what processes we need for development
I just wrote https://wiki.ubuntu.com/BugHelper/Dev which links to the
information we have, also I added a couple of processes which we could
discuss during the meeting. Hopefully they are not too bureaucratic and
will just help with what we do.
See you in the meeting,
Daniel
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-bugsquad/attachments/20070114/dd291a48/attachment.sig>
From daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com Sun Jan 14 12:05:18 2007
From: daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com (Daniel Holbach)
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 12:05:18 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79215] Re: RFE: port command line parsing to something sane
References: <20070114115830.5477.44398.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070114120518.5371.168.launchpad@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
** Changed in: bughelper (upstream)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
--
RFE: port command line parsing to something sane
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79215
From daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com Sun Jan 14 12:15:34 2007
From: daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com (Daniel Holbach)
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 12:15:34 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79218] RFE: Write manpages for bughelper suite
References: <20070114121534.5371.23727.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070114121534.5371.23727.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Public bug reported:
Somebody please write up some manpages we can install with the suite. I
suggest we use docbook to write them and build man pages from them
during the package build process.
./README in the branch ~bugsquad/bughelper/bughelper.main should have
enough information already - it just needs to be written up. To get an
idea of docbook for manpages run:
apt-get source kxmame; cd kxmame-*; less debian/kxmame.1.docbook
** Affects: bughelper (upstream)
Importance: Medium
Status: Confirmed
** Changed in: bughelper (upstream)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Changed in: bughelper (upstream)
Status: Unconfirmed => Confirmed
** Tags added: bitesize documentation
--
RFE: Write manpages for bughelper suite
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79218
From daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com Sun Jan 14 12:20:13 2007
From: daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com (Daniel Holbach)
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 12:20:13 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79215] Re: RFE: port command line parsing to something sane
References: <20070114115830.5477.44398.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070114122013.25372.61956.launchpad@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
** Changed in: bughelper (upstream)
Status: Unconfirmed => Confirmed
--
RFE: port command line parsing to something sane
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79215
From daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com Sun Jan 14 12:26:58 2007
From: daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com (Daniel Holbach)
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 12:26:58 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79220] RFE: automate simple adding and changing of info clues
References: <20070114122658.5477.90505.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070114122658.5477.90505.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Public bug reported:
I envision bugxml doing this in the future:
bugxml -sa totem "libxine.so" "This is probably a libxine problem. Ask
the user to check if xine-ui has the same problem."
The tool would then
* check if ./packages/totem.info exists
* if not, check for ./totem.info
* if one of them exists, add <clue><op>libxine.so</op><info>This is probably a libxine problem. Ask the user to check if xine-ui has the same problem.</info></clue> nodes below the <clues> node.
* if not, create a new file.
This of course only handles the simple cases, but it'd be a good
improvement for our workflow.
** Affects: bughelper (upstream)
Importance: Wishlist
Status: Confirmed
** Changed in: bughelper (upstream)
Importance: Undecided => Wishlist
Status: Unconfirmed => Confirmed
** Tags added: commandline xml
--
RFE: automate simple adding and changing of info clues
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79220
From henrik at ubuntu.com Sun Jan 14 12:34:49 2007
From: henrik at ubuntu.com (Henrik Nilsen Omma)
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 12:34:49 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79220] Re: RFE: automate simple adding and changing of info clues
References: <20070114122658.5477.90505.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070114123450.25372.72824.malone@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Good idea. And the simplest cases will probably account for 90% of clues
anyway.
--
RFE: automate simple adding and changing of info clues
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79220
From henrik at ubuntu.com Sun Jan 14 12:32:29 2007
From: henrik at ubuntu.com (Henrik Nilsen Omma)
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 12:32:29 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79157] Re: RFE: support local clue files
References: <20070113225823.25421.58908.malonedeb@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070114123229.25421.27471.malone@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Your suggestion of
bughelper -r <package>.info
has the advantage that you don't have to type the package name. I'm wondering if it might be easy to mix up he files though. Perhaps the extension should show clearly that is a new/custom file in some standard way? <package>.newinfo or .myinfo
Not sure how the directory option would work. There would have to be
only one .info file in there or bughelper would use them all the first
one / random one.
--
RFE: support local clue files
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79157
From roelhuybrechts at skynet.be Sun Jan 14 12:33:57 2007
From: roelhuybrechts at skynet.be (Roel Huybrechts)
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 13:33:57 +0100
Subject: bughelper meeting (was Re: bughelper knows new cluefiles!)
In-Reply-To: <1168776437.5418.7.camel@lovegood>
References: <1168623803.25226.6.camel@lovegood>
<20070112215139.eldGr.alexm@alexm.org>
<1168766329.18880.29.camel@lovegood>
<1168776437.5418.7.camel@lovegood>
Message-ID: <1168778037.14938.3.camel@localhost>
As I probably won't have an Internet connection on Thursday, can someone
please save a transcript of the meeting?
Thanks in advance,
Roel
On Sun, 2007-01-14 at 13:07 +0100, Daniel Holbach wrote:
> Hello again,
>
> On So, 2007-01-14 at 10:18 +0100, Daniel Holbach wrote:
> > * what processes we need for development
>
> I just wrote https://wiki.ubuntu.com/BugHelper/Dev which links to the
> information we have, also I added a couple of processes which we could
> discuss during the meeting. Hopefully they are not too bureaucratic and
> will just help with what we do.
>
> See you in the meeting,
> Daniel
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-bugsquad/attachments/20070114/ca382204/attachment.sig>
From henrik at ubuntu.com Sun Jan 14 12:38:28 2007
From: henrik at ubuntu.com (Henrik Nilsen Omma)
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 12:38:28 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79142] Re: RFE: Read and write text files with bug numbers
References: <20070113220536.5477.55657.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070114123828.25421.50164.malone@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Sure, along with -r/wp (read/plain text) and -r/wh (read/write html)
--
RFE: Read and write text files with bug numbers
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79142
From daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com Sun Jan 14 12:40:18 2007
From: daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com (Daniel Holbach)
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 12:40:18 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79222] RFE: add documentation to bughelper
References: <20070114124018.5477.36514.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070114124018.5477.36514.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Public bug reported:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/BugHelper/Tutorial is already a good start, but
I think it'd be great if we had a ./docs/ directory in the branch, which
people would have with a checkout or with their installation of
bughelper. We also have information scattered across the wiki and the
mailing list, it'd be nice to have somebody maintaining that also.
docs/tutorial/adding-clues, docs/tutorial/using-bughelper,
docs/processes, docs/development, docs/examples, docs/workflow are
things I can already think of.
** Affects: bughelper (upstream)
Importance: High
Status: Confirmed
** Changed in: bughelper (upstream)
Importance: Undecided => High
Status: Unconfirmed => Confirmed
** Tags added: bitesize documentation
--
RFE: add documentation to bughelper
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79222
From henrik at ubuntu.com Sun Jan 14 12:44:15 2007
From: henrik at ubuntu.com (Henrik Nilsen Omma)
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 12:44:15 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79140] Re: RFE: Rank bugs by number of dupes
References: <20070113215955.5371.39011.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070114124415.5477.23899.malone@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
When starting work on a new package I want to have a list of ALL bugs
ever filed on <package> (including closed ones) with more than N(~5)
duplicates. Then I will look at those to see which ones may still
generate dupes and use that as the basis for my cluefile for <package>.
THEN I will apply bughelper to all the untriaged bugs with my new
cluefile and see if any new dupe candidates come up.
--
RFE: Rank bugs by number of dupes
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79140
From henrik at ubuntu.com Sun Jan 14 12:45:47 2007
From: henrik at ubuntu.com (Henrik Nilsen Omma)
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 12:45:47 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79136] Re: RFE: Last comment by <LP ID>
References: <20070113210955.5477.88446.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070114124547.25372.54103.malone@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Sure.
--
RFE: Last comment by <LP ID>
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79136
From daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com Sun Jan 14 12:54:46 2007
From: daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com (Daniel Holbach)
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 13:54:46 +0100
Subject: bughelper meeting (was Re: bughelper knows new cluefiles!)
In-Reply-To: <1168778037.14938.3.camel@localhost>
References: <1168623803.25226.6.camel@lovegood>
<20070112215139.eldGr.alexm@alexm.org>
<1168766329.18880.29.camel@lovegood>
<1168776437.5418.7.camel@lovegood> <1168778037.14938.3.camel@localhost>
Message-ID: <1168779286.5418.14.camel@lovegood>
Hello Roel,
thanks for your mail.
On So, 2007-01-14 at 13:33 +0100, Roel Huybrechts wrote:
> As I probably won't have an Internet connection on Thursday, can someone
> please save a transcript of the meeting?
Sure, no problem. I'll add it to the BugHelper/ wiki namespace and post
the link on the list.
Have a nice day,
Daniel
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-bugsquad/attachments/20070114/c5e8279e/attachment.sig>
From daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com Sun Jan 14 12:52:04 2007
From: daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com (Daniel Holbach)
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 12:52:04 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79157] Re: RFE: support local clue files
References: <20070113225823.25421.58908.malonedeb@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070114125204.25372.2412.malone@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
> I'm wondering if it might be easy to mix up he files though.
I suggest assuming /usr/share/bughelper/packages as the global clue file
location (if the package is installed), then maybe check the "/packages"
directory relative to where the currently run bughelper script resides.
I don't see any trouble mixing them up.
> Not sure how the directory option would work.
We would
* first check os.path.isfile(sys.argv[x]) then use the given .info file
* then check os.path.isdir(sys.argv[x]) and use all the files in that directory
* then check glob.glob(sys.argv[x]) and go through the list of possible matches.
> There would have
> to be only one .info file in there or bughelper would use them
> all the first one / random one.
I don't quite understand why we would need this. bughelper knows which
source package a given bug belongs to, so it can easily check if there's
a .info file for that bug.
--
RFE: support local clue files
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79157
From daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com Sun Jan 14 12:55:42 2007
From: daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com (Daniel Holbach)
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 12:55:42 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79142] Re: RFE: Read and write text files with bug numbers
References: <20070113220536.5477.55657.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070114125542.25372.37596.malone@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
What specifically do you think would the HTML options read or write?
What would a format look like?
--
RFE: Read and write text files with bug numbers
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79142
From daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com Sun Jan 14 12:58:52 2007
From: daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com (Daniel Holbach)
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 12:58:52 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79140] Re: RFE: Rank bugs by number of dupes
References: <20070113215955.5371.39011.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070114125852.25421.24243.malone@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Good idea. We need command line switches for that. Can you think of what
would you would type in (in the future) to achieve this?
** Tags added: commandline
--
RFE: Rank bugs by number of dupes
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79140
From daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com Sun Jan 14 13:01:19 2007
From: daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com (Daniel Holbach)
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 13:01:19 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79136] Re: RFE: Last comment by <LP ID>
References: <20070113210955.5477.88446.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070114130119.25372.716.launchpad@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
** Changed in: bughelper (upstream)
Status: Needs Info => Confirmed
** Tags added: htmlparsing
--
RFE: Last comment by <LP ID>
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79136
From daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com Sun Jan 14 13:27:46 2007
From: daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com (Daniel Holbach)
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 14:27:46 +0100
Subject: [bughelper] Reaching Out
Message-ID: <1168781266.5418.32.camel@lovegood>
Hello everybody,
I want to point your attention to http://wiki.ubuntu.com/BugHelper - an
initiative by the BugSquad to help with bug triage and ease tasks
related to it.
While the code in ~bugsquad/bughelper/bughelper.main [1] does not do
that much yet, there are a lot of improvements and enhancements planned
already [2]. We'll have a meeting to discuss the future of the tool soon
[3].
[1] https://launchpad.net/~bugsquad/+branch/bughelper/bughelper.main
[2] http://launchpad.net/bughelper/+bugs
[3] https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-bugsquad/2007-January/000236.html
The reasons for reaching out to you are many-sided: I personally think
that it might help you a lot with your daily bug work, but there are a
couple of implications this will have. I'd also like to ask you for your
opinion, help, comments (ubuntu-bugsquad@ list and BugHelper wiki) and
bugs (bug reports on the bughelper product).
Now I'd like to address a few of you directly:
* Bjorn, Stuart: as long as we don't have XML dumps for Malone
data, yet we'll be parsing HTML output. It's clear, that this
means workload on Malone - if you should witness problems with
that, please let us know and we'll try to work-around or plan
differently.
* Bjorn: it'd be great to hear your views on the project
specifically.
* Bjorn, Matthew (mpt): if the look of Malone should change, we
probably need to adapt the regular expressions in
BugHelper/HTMLOperations.py
* Matthew (mpt): if you have the time and could give us a follow
up on [4], that'd be great. It's about making user experience of
the command line interface consistent.
* People from the Documentation Team: we already have a short
tutorial [5], an overview over the capabilities [6] and some
bugs tagged as 'documentation' [7]. If somebody of you could
check how they sane they are and help us out a bit, that'd be
awesome.
[4] https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-bugsquad/2007-January/000259.html
[5] http://wiki.ubuntu.com/BugHelper/Tutorial
[6] http://wiki.ubuntu.com/BugHelper
[7] https://launchpad.net/bughelper/+bugs?field.tag=documentation
Thanks a lot to all of you.
Have a nice day,
Daniel
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-bugsquad/attachments/20070114/46301a30/attachment.sig>
From daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com Sun Jan 14 13:34:04 2007
From: daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com (Daniel Holbach)
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 14:34:04 +0100
Subject: [bughelper] 'bitesize' tasks
Message-ID: <1168781644.5418.37.camel@lovegood>
Hello everybody,
I tagged a few bughelper bugs as 'bitesize' [1]. These are meant to be
easy and a good start to help us out. Just branch of
~bugsquad/bughelper/bughelper.main [2] and start hacking on your own
branch. Find information on using bzr here [3].
[1] https://launchpad.net/bughelper/+bugs?field.tag=bitesize
[2] https://launchpad.net/~bugsquad/+branch/bughelper/bughelper.main
[3] http://bazaar-vcs.org/Documentation
Your help will change a lot and we hope to have a friendly crew of
bughelper hackers together soon, which will help Ubuntu tremenduously
with the increasing amount of bug triage work.
Thanks a lot,
Daniel
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-bugsquad/attachments/20070114/8b88c348/attachment.sig>
From daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com Sun Jan 14 13:44:27 2007
From: daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com (Daniel Holbach)
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 14:44:27 +0100
Subject: [bughelper] mail volume on ubuntu-bugsquad list
Message-ID: <1168782267.5418.42.camel@lovegood>
Hello everybody,
In the last two days, I noticed a few people unsubscribing from the
ubuntu-bugsquad list. I can only guess that it's related due to the
increased mail volume regarding the bughelper project.
Personally, I will prepend all my mails with [bughelper] now, to make it
easy to filter them to another folder or get rid of them, if you prefer
to do that.
For the moment I don't want to take bughelper of the BugSquad mailing
list, because I think the input from BugSquad people is crucial to the
beginning of bughelper. Also I hope that all of you will start helping
out soon:
* Either with hacking and improving bughelper directly
* or writing and improving .info files.
I can only ask for your patience and hope you bear with us in the
starting phase of bughelper.
Thanks a lot. Have a nice day,
Daniel
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-bugsquad/attachments/20070114/72f5a293/attachment.sig>
From daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com Sun Jan 14 13:39:28 2007
From: daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com (Daniel Holbach)
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 13:39:28 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79231] RFE: print bughelper version
References: <20070114133928.5371.68136.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070114133928.5371.68136.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Public bug reported:
bughelper should know which version it is. This information is useful
for debugging bughelper problems.
Invoked with -V it should either return
* the bzr revision (parse bzr log , bonus points for using bzrlib directly)
* the version of the installed package (parse dpkg -l ), if it is no branch.
** Affects: bughelper (upstream)
Importance: Wishlist
Status: Confirmed
** Changed in: bughelper (upstream)
Importance: Undecided => Wishlist
Status: Unconfirmed => Confirmed
** Tags added: bitesize commandline
--
RFE: print bughelper version
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79231
From ubuntu at alexm.org Sun Jan 14 13:44:47 2007
From: ubuntu at alexm.org (Alex Muntada)
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 13:44:47 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79143] Re: RFE: more search criteria
References: <20070113220928.25372.69034.malonedeb@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070114134447.25421.86559.malone@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
IMHO, it seems that we'll need many command line options to deal with
all this criteria properly. Maybe an interactive helper agent (like a
shell) will make things easier to use.
We don't need IA like behaviour yet, but it should be probably the way
to go, and eventually even launchpad could benefit from this tool, e.g.
trying to find dupes before new bugs are filed, helping to find existing
bugs easily, etc.
And we'll need a name for that agent, of course ;)
--
RFE: more search criteria
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79143
From daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com Sun Jan 14 14:10:37 2007
From: daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com (Daniel Holbach)
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 14:10:37 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79143] Re: RFE: more search criteria
References: <20070113220928.25372.69034.malonedeb@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070114141037.25372.61928.malone@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Sorry, but I'm going to close the bug. It's much too much to address in a single bug and it's far too unclear up until now. I started https://wiki.ubuntu.com/BugHelper/Dev/Searching and hope we as a team will be able to
* specify what we want very carefully and in a very clear form
* write it like a spec or several specs(?)
** Changed in: bughelper (upstream)
Status: Needs Info => Rejected
--
RFE: more search criteria
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79143
From pandisv at yahoo.co.uk Sun Jan 14 15:30:36 2007
From: pandisv at yahoo.co.uk (Vassilis Pandis)
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 15:30:36 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79243] README refers to bugnumbers instead of bughelper
References: <20070114153036.5371.14009.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070114153036.5371.14009.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Public bug reported:
>From the README:
/usr/bin/bughelper
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This tool searches through bugs and tries to find matches with data in .info
files. It has the same functionality and switches as 'bugnumbers´. In addition
to that it accepts
'-A´ which lets it search through all the bug attachments with the mime type
text/plain.
Examples:
bugnumbers -a evolution
bugnumbers -A -l https://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+source/gcalctool/+bugs
shouldn't the example be 'bughelper' instead of 'bugnumbers' ?
** Affects: bughelper (upstream)
Importance: Low
Status: Unconfirmed
** Changed in: bughelper (upstream)
Importance: Undecided => Low
--
README refers to bugnumbers instead of bughelper
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79243
From pandisv at yahoo.co.uk Sun Jan 14 15:37:11 2007
From: pandisv at yahoo.co.uk (Vassilis Pandis)
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 15:37:11 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79248] [Patch] Better ubiquity.info
References: <20070114153711.25372.53140.malonedeb@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070114153711.25372.53140.malonedeb@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Public bug reported:
Current ubiquity.info isn't really helpful. I tried making one, here it
is. I can't test it because of bug 79247
** Affects: bughelper (upstream)
Importance: Undecided
Status: Unconfirmed
--
[Patch] Better ubiquity.info
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79248
From pandisv at yahoo.co.uk Sun Jan 14 15:37:25 2007
From: pandisv at yahoo.co.uk (Vassilis Pandis)
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 15:37:25 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79248] Re: [Patch] Better ubiquity.info
References: <20070114153711.25372.53140.malonedeb@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070114153726.25372.20555.malone@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
** Attachment added: "updated ubiquity.info"
http://librarian.launchpad.net/5739129/ubiquity.info
--
[Patch] Better ubiquity.info
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79248
From pandisv at yahoo.co.uk Sun Jan 14 15:36:27 2007
From: pandisv at yahoo.co.uk (Vassilis Pandis)
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 15:36:27 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79247] bughelper fails when processing ubiquity
References: <20070114153627.25421.30338.malonedeb@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070114153627.25421.30338.malonedeb@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Public bug reported:
This is from Daniel's branch. I checked it out, and then tried the
following:
pandis at pandis-laptop:~/bughelper$ ./bughelper -A -l https://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bugs
I/O warning : failed to load external entity "packages/linux-source-2.6.15.info"
Error reading info file packages/linux-source-2.6.15.info
I/O warning : failed to load external entity "packages/ubiquity (Ubuntu): “Manual Partitioning during.info"
Error reading info file packages/ubiquity (Ubuntu): “Manual Partitioning during.info
I/O warning : failed to load external entity "packages/ubiquity (Ubuntu):.info"
Error reading info file packages/ubiquity (Ubuntu):.info
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "./bughelper", line 42, in ?
main()
File "./bughelper", line 28, in main
b = bug(bugNum, cl)
File "/home/pandis/bughelper/bugHelper/HTMLOperations.py", line 60, in __init__
self.text = sock.read()
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/httplib.py", line 965, in read
s = self._read()
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/httplib.py", line 941, in _read
buf = self._ssl.read(self._bufsize)
KeyboardInterrupt
Seems to me that something is wrong. This is with the default 'ask henrik' ubiquity.info
** Affects: bughelper (upstream)
Importance: Undecided
Status: Unconfirmed
--
bughelper fails when processing ubiquity
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79247
From henrik at ubuntu.com Sun Jan 14 15:55:18 2007
From: henrik at ubuntu.com (Henrik Nilsen Omma)
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 15:55:18 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79243] Re: README refers to bugnumbers instead of bughelper
References: <20070114153036.5371.14009.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070114155518.25372.75892.malone@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
It should indeed. Fixed in my tree.
** Changed in: bughelper (upstream)
Status: Unconfirmed => Fix Committed
--
README refers to bugnumbers instead of bughelper
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79243
From henrik at ubuntu.com Sun Jan 14 16:08:10 2007
From: henrik at ubuntu.com (Henrik Nilsen Omma)
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 16:08:10 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79247] Re: bughelper fails when processing ubiquity
References: <20070114153627.25421.30338.malonedeb@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070114160810.25372.6093.malone@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Right, so I can confirm this. It's broken with the -l URL switch. The
error is in connection with an external library that I am not familiar
with. Daniel?
In the meantime, plain 'bughelper -A ubiquity' works for me. Have you
tried that?
--
bughelper fails when processing ubiquity
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79247
From daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com Sun Jan 14 16:20:59 2007
From: daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com (Daniel Holbach)
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 16:20:59 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79248] Re: [Patch] Better ubiquity.info
References: <20070114153711.25372.53140.malonedeb@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070114162059.25372.54663.malone@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Thanks for that. Committed to my branch - once bug 79247 is fixed, I'll
commit both fixes to ~bugsquad/bughelper/bughelper.dev
** Changed in: bughelper (upstream)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
Assignee: (unassigned) => Daniel Holbach
Status: Unconfirmed => Fix Committed
--
[Patch] Better ubiquity.info
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79248
From daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com Sun Jan 14 16:24:01 2007
From: daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com (Daniel Holbach)
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 16:24:01 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79243] Re: README refers to bugnumbers instead of bughelper
References: <20070114153036.5371.14009.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070114162401.5477.5160.malone@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Right... thanks for that, Vassilis.
Henrik: can you mark ~henrik/bughelper/dev as 'Abandoned', so I'll stop
clicking on it? ;-) You can also push that fix directly to
~bugsquad/bughelper/bughelper.main
** Changed in: bughelper (upstream)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Henrik Nilsen Omma
--
README refers to bugnumbers instead of bughelper
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79243
From daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com Sun Jan 14 16:27:54 2007
From: daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com (Daniel Holbach)
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 16:27:54 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79247] Re: bughelper fails when processing ubiquity
References: <20070114153627.25421.30338.malonedeb@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070114162754.25372.84090.malone@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
I'll dig into this tomorrow.
For now, I suspect a problem in ./bugHelper/HTMLOperations.py trying to determine which source package is affected, if the package has more than one bug task.
We should probably make sure that if more than one package is affected,
all <package>.info files are considered.
** Changed in: bughelper (upstream)
Importance: Undecided => High
Assignee: (unassigned) => Daniel Holbach
Status: Unconfirmed => Confirmed
--
bughelper fails when processing ubiquity
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79247
From daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com Sun Jan 14 16:36:01 2007
From: daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com (Daniel Holbach)
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 17:36:01 +0100
Subject: bughelper meeting (was Re: bughelper knows new cluefiles!)
In-Reply-To: <1168766329.18880.29.camel@lovegood>
References: <1168623803.25226.6.camel@lovegood>
<20070112215139.eldGr.alexm@alexm.org>
<1168766329.18880.29.camel@lovegood>
Message-ID: <1168792561.5385.3.camel@lovegood>
Hello again,
On So, 2007-01-14 at 10:18 +0100, Daniel Holbach wrote:
> * which way we'll go in the future
we should probably discuss what goals we want to achieve for 0.1 - which
should be as a package in Ubuntu too. Henrik: can you create that
milestone in Launchpad, so we can track bugs for that?
I suggest we:
* fix and polish documentation,
* fix grave bugs (like bug 79247),
* our 'bitesize tasks',
* the 'simple add' option and
* of course: add some initial .info files
With goals like that, I guess we'll be ready to go in February.
Have a nice day,
Daniel
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-bugsquad/attachments/20070114/d0392b58/attachment.sig>
From henrik at ubuntu.com Sun Jan 14 20:56:15 2007
From: henrik at ubuntu.com (Henrik Nilsen Omma)
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 20:56:15 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79133] Re: RFE: Option to count comments
References: <20070113210431.25421.78854.malonedeb@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070114205615.25421.65630.malone@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
I think we need an option for looking at bugs WITH or WITHOUT clues
generally. Finding all the bugs filed in the past two weeks that have 0
comments might be a good way of find bugs that need an initial reply
(which is a good task for novice triagers).
--
RFE: Option to count comments
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79133
From henrik at ubuntu.com Sun Jan 14 21:02:59 2007
From: henrik at ubuntu.com (Henrik Nilsen Omma)
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 21:02:59 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79243] Re: README refers to bugnumbers instead of bughelper
References: <20070114153036.5371.14009.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070114210259.5477.88716.malone@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Done.
** Changed in: bughelper (upstream)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
README refers to bugnumbers instead of bughelper
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79243
From henrik at ubuntu.com Sun Jan 14 21:05:01 2007
From: henrik at ubuntu.com (Henrik Nilsen Omma)
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 21:05:01 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79140] Re: RFE: Rank bugs by number of dupes
References: <20070113215955.5371.39011.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070114210501.5477.43540.malone@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
-dg5 = dupes GT 5
-dl5 = dupes LT 5
?
--
RFE: Rank bugs by number of dupes
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79140
From henrik at ubuntu.com Sun Jan 14 21:02:34 2007
From: henrik at ubuntu.com (Henrik Nilsen Omma)
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 21:02:34 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79248] Re: [Patch] Better ubiquity.info
References: <20070114153711.25372.53140.malonedeb@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070114210234.25421.7850.malone@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
merged in main
** Changed in: bughelper (upstream)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
[Patch] Better ubiquity.info
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79248
From henrik at ubuntu.com Sun Jan 14 21:08:18 2007
From: henrik at ubuntu.com (Henrik Nilsen Omma)
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 21:08:18 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79142] Re: RFE: Read and write text files with bug numbers
References: <20070113220536.5477.55657.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070114210818.25372.27685.malone@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
It would output <a href="URL">Bug # and title</a><br /> in to out.html.
I could then just click on the output file and it would open in firefox.
I then Ctrl-Click on all the links and off I go triaging at speed :)
--
RFE: Read and write text files with bug numbers
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79142
From dean at deansas.org Mon Jan 15 01:12:18 2007
From: dean at deansas.org (Dean Sas)
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 01:12:18 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79231] Re: RFE: print bughelper version
References: <20070114133928.5371.68136.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070115011218.32010.82311.malone@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Using bzrlib is probably easier than parsing the bzr log output:
from bzrlib.bzrdir import BzrDir
revision = BzrDir.open(pathToBranchDir).open_branch().revno()
I'll have a go at hacking on this tomorrow.
** Changed in: bughelper (upstream)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Dean Sas
--
RFE: print bughelper version
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79231
From sfllaw at ubuntu.com Mon Jan 15 16:26:54 2007
From: sfllaw at ubuntu.com (Simon Law)
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 11:26:54 -0500
Subject: UbuntuBugDay - 17 January 2007
Message-ID: <20070115162654.GF11878@law.yi.org>
Happy New Year!
I hope you all had a good holiday! Now that you are rested and
cheerful, perhaps you'd consider joining us for an Ubuntu Bug Day? As
usual, we'll be meeting for all of Wednesday in the #ubuntu-bugs IRC
channel on irc.freenode.net.
We've released Feisty Fawn's second milestone [1] and we're going to be
testing it this Wednesday. Feel free to download some images, burn them
to CDs, and give Feisty a test drive.
As well, we'll be processing more applications for the Ubuntu QA [2]
team, That's the team you join after working with the BugSquad for a
while and want to contribute further. Its webpage gives guidelines on
how to join.
For more information, take a look at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBugDay
which has links to more details.
[1] http://fridge.ubuntu.com/node/712
[2] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuQA
Cheers,
--
Simon Law http://www.law.yi.org/~sfllaw/
From daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com Mon Jan 15 16:40:01 2007
From: daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com (Daniel Holbach)
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 16:40:01 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79247] Re: bughelper fails when processing ubiquity
References: <20070114153627.25421.30338.malonedeb@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070115164002.25421.76222.malone@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
The regular expression was wrong indeed and it was a simple fix (using the non-greedy matching):
- titleFilter = '<title>Bug #[0-9]* in (.*) .*: .*'
+ titleFilter = '<title>Bug #[0-9]* in (.*?) .*: .*'
I found some other bugs related to reading and evaluating the clue
files. Some might be related to the change from python2.4 to python2.5
(?).
If somebody can tell me, why I need to do the following check in infoFiles.py, I'd be happy to chuck it out again, it looks like a hack to me:
if type(condition) == types.TupleType:
[....]
I committed the change to my bzr branch - somebody please review and
merge into ~bugsquad/bughelper/bughelper.main
Output is now:
daniel at bert:~/bzr/bughelper$ ./bughelper -l https://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bugs
I/O warning : failed to load external entity "packages/linux-source-2.6.15.info"
I/O warning : failed to load external entity "packages/casper.info"
daniel at bert:~/bzr/bughelper$
** Changed in: bughelper (upstream)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed
--
bughelper fails when processing ubiquity
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79247
From daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com Mon Jan 15 16:43:57 2007
From: daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com (Daniel Holbach)
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 16:43:57 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79142] Re: RFE: Read and write text files with bug numbers
References: <20070113220536.5477.55657.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070115164357.20188.97627.malone@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Ok.
** Changed in: bughelper (upstream)
Status: Needs Info => Confirmed
--
RFE: Read and write text files with bug numbers
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79142
From daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com Mon Jan 15 16:46:57 2007
From: daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com (Daniel Holbach)
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 16:46:57 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79140] Re: RFE: Rank bugs by number of dupes
References: <20070113215955.5371.39011.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070115164657.25421.39181.malone@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Ok with me.
** Changed in: bughelper (upstream)
Status: Needs Info => Confirmed
--
RFE: Rank bugs by number of dupes
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79140
From daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com Mon Jan 15 16:48:33 2007
From: daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com (Daniel Holbach)
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 16:48:33 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79133] Re: RFE: Option to count comments
References: <20070113210431.25421.78854.malonedeb@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070115164833.25421.58230.malone@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
-k ubiquity ('k'ount)
-kv ubiquity ('k'ount 'v'erbose)?
--
RFE: Option to count comments
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79133
From henrik at ubuntu.com Mon Jan 15 19:16:00 2007
From: henrik at ubuntu.com (Henrik Nilsen Omma)
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 19:16:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79247] Re: bughelper fails when processing ubiquity
References: <20070114153627.25421.30338.malonedeb@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070115191600.20113.34516.malone@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
It no longer crashes on a URL for me but I do get a message about a
different package (the next one alphabetically?)
./bughelper -l https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vino/+bugs
http://launchpad.net/bugs/43050 : Vino crasher bugs
I/O warning : failed to load external entity "packages/vnc.info"
Anyway, I've merged and pushed the changes so the crasher bug is fixed.
** Changed in: bughelper (upstream)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
bughelper fails when processing ubiquity
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79247
From daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com Mon Jan 15 22:02:24 2007
From: daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com (Daniel Holbach)
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 22:02:24 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79247] Re: bughelper fails when processing ubiquity
References: <20070114153627.25421.30338.malonedeb@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070115220224.20113.49163.malone@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
That's a problem trying to parse the HTML of bug 26827. If somebody can
perfect the regular expression I tried to fix, that'd be cool.
--
bughelper fails when processing ubiquity
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79247
From ubuntu at alexm.org Mon Jan 15 22:47:51 2007
From: ubuntu at alexm.org (Alex Muntada)
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 22:47:51 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79247] Re: bughelper fails when processing ubiquity
References: <20070114153627.25421.30338.malonedeb@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070115224751.25372.19689.malone@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
I've been playing a little with regular expressions and finally added
some "print" calls to see what's happening and I found that the problem
isn't with bug 26827. Actually, the problem is bug 77442, which has
several source packages listed. If you fetch
https://launchpad.net/bugs/77442 the title shows the problem:
<title>Bug #77442 in vnc (Ubuntu): ...
Since there's different source packages for this bug there's also the
change to get a different name each time, depending on the fetching
method and LP behaviour. It seems that the last source package is
listed, but I could be wrong (maybe we should ask LP developers).
--
bughelper fails when processing ubiquity
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79247
From ubuntu at alexm.org Mon Jan 15 23:28:54 2007
From: ubuntu at alexm.org (Alex Muntada)
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 23:28:54 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79247] Re: bughelper fails when processing ubiquity
References: <20070114153627.25421.30338.malonedeb@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070115232854.20188.49313.malone@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
The diff below against latest Daniel's branch shows the problem and how
to get a full list of source packages. Since there are more than one, I
guess that self.sourcepackage should be a list (or set); but I have to
figure out how the whole thing works yet, so I can provide a wider
patch.
== modified file 'bugHelper/HTMLOperations.py'
--- bugHelper/HTMLOperations.py 2007-01-15 16:38:45 +0000
+++ bugHelper/HTMLOperations.py 2007-01-15 23:21:30 +0000
@@ -61,8 +61,10 @@
sock.close()
if not len(self.sourcepackage):
- titleFilter = '<title>Bug #[0-9]* in (.*?) .*: .*'
- filteredSourcePackage = re.findall(titleFilter, self.text)
+ viewstatusFilter = 'viewstatus">([^ ]*) [^<]*</a>'
+ filteredSourcePackage = re.findall(viewstatusFilter, self.text)
+ print bugnumber
+ print filteredSourcePackage
self.sourcepackage = filteredSourcePackage[0]
if cl.attachments:
--
bughelper fails when processing ubiquity
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79247
From ubuntu at alexm.org Mon Jan 15 23:30:04 2007
From: ubuntu at alexm.org (Alex Muntada)
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 23:30:04 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79247] Re: bughelper fails when processing ubiquity
References: <20070114153627.25421.30338.malonedeb@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070115233004.20113.37579.malone@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Sorry, I forgot to mention that those "print" lines on the diff are only
for debugging purposes and let you see the multiple source package
results for each bug.
--
bughelper fails when processing ubiquity
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79247
From dean at deansas.org Tue Jan 16 02:47:34 2007
From: dean at deansas.org (Dean Sas)
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 02:47:34 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79231] Re: RFE: print bughelper version
References: <20070114133928.5371.68136.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070116024734.25372.40953.malone@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
https://code.launchpad.net/~dsas/+branch/bughelper/bughelper.dev should
have the relevant fix (revision 21).
It's my first real time using python, so it probably wants a careful
review. I used python-apt to get the current revision number rather than
parse dpkg -l. though I can alter to do that if its preferred.
** Changed in: bughelper (upstream)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed
--
RFE: print bughelper version
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79231
From daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com Tue Jan 16 12:14:46 2007
From: daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com (Daniel Holbach)
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 12:14:46 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79247] Re: bughelper fails when processing ubiquity
References: <20070114153627.25421.30338.malonedeb@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070116121446.25421.55236.malone@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Can you open another bug about that? The processing of multiple source
packages in case a bug affects more than one? This is a feature we
should definitely have in 0.1
--
bughelper fails when processing ubiquity
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79247
From daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com Tue Jan 16 12:12:33 2007
From: daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com (Daniel Holbach)
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 12:12:33 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79231] Re: RFE: print bughelper version
References: <20070114133928.5371.68136.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070116121233.20113.8359.malone@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Thanks a lot for your work on that! Great work.
Some things, I'd like to comment on:
* usage of tabs vs. spaces: I used spaces throughout bughelper and it'd be nice if we could stick to that. It doesn't make python happy if both occur in mixed ways. python -tt <file> can help to find problems related to that.
* I moved the "find_version_string()" function to bugHelper/utils.py - to keep commandLine.py command line related - hope that's ok with you.
* When I wrote the bug, I didn't think about how lonely "bughelper 21" would look, so I search setup.py for the current version number and add "r<revision>" to it - hope that makes sense to everybody. If there's a cleverer way, please fix my attempt.
Thanks for your good work - if you could have a look at
~dholbach/bughelper/bughelper.dev and read the diff, I'd appreciate it.
Thanks again!
--
RFE: print bughelper version
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79231
From daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com Tue Jan 16 13:05:16 2007
From: daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com (Daniel Holbach)
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 13:05:16 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79157] Re: RFE: support local clue files
References: <20070113225823.25421.58908.malonedeb@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070116130517.25372.77928.malone@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Does that sound ok?
--
RFE: support local clue files
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79157
From daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com Tue Jan 16 13:05:15 2007
From: daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com (Daniel Holbach)
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 13:05:15 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79133] Re: RFE: Option to count comments
References: <20070113210431.25421.78854.malonedeb@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070116130515.25421.63613.malone@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Does that sound ok?
--
RFE: Option to count comments
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79133
From daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com Tue Jan 16 13:21:13 2007
From: daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com (Daniel Holbach)
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 13:21:13 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79231] Re: RFE: print bughelper version
References: <20070114133928.5371.68136.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070116132113.20113.60616.malone@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
I just pushed the changes to ~bugsquad/bughelper/bughelper.main - thanks
a lot Dean for working on this! You ROCK!
If somebody could update the wiki pages and documentation that refers to
the command line, that'd be swell.
** Changed in: bughelper (upstream)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
RFE: print bughelper version
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79231
From ubuntu at alexm.org Tue Jan 16 14:04:01 2007
From: ubuntu at alexm.org (Alex Muntada)
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 14:04:01 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79546] Parsing multiple source packages in a bug
References: <20070116140401.25421.62983.malonedeb@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070116140401.25421.62983.malonedeb@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Public bug reported:
Some bugs like bug 77442 have several source packages listed. If you
fetch https://launchpad.net/bugs/77442 the title shows only one if them,
so it can't be used to get the source package name, i.e.:
<title>Bug #77442 in vnc (Ubuntu): ...
Since there's different source packages for this bug there's also the
change to get a different name each time, depending on the fetching
method and LP behaviour. It seems that the last source package is
listed, but I could be wrong (maybe we should ask LP developers).
(Found while working on bug 79247)
** Affects: bughelper (upstream)
Importance: High
Status: Confirmed
--
Parsing multiple source packages in a bug
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79546
From ubuntu at alexm.org Tue Jan 16 14:05:30 2007
From: ubuntu at alexm.org (Alex Muntada)
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 14:05:30 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79546] Re: Parsing multiple source packages in a bug
References: <20070116140401.25421.62983.malonedeb@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070116140530.20188.7063.malone@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
The diff below against latest Daniel's branch shows the problem and how
to get a full list of source packages. Since there are more than one, I
guess that self.sourcepackage should be a list (or set); but I have to
figure out how the whole thing works yet, so I can provide a wider
patch.
Please, note that those "print" lines on the diff are only for debugging
purposes, to let you see the multiple source package results for each
bug.
== modified file 'bugHelper/HTMLOperations.py'
--- bugHelper/HTMLOperations.py 2007-01-15 16:38:45 +0000
+++ bugHelper/HTMLOperations.py 2007-01-15 23:21:30 +0000
@@ -61,8 +61,10 @@
sock.close()
if not len(self.sourcepackage):
- titleFilter = '<title>Bug #[0-9]* in (.*?) .*: .*'
- filteredSourcePackage = re.findall(titleFilter, self.text)
+ viewstatusFilter = 'viewstatus">([^ ]*) [^<]*</a>'
+ filteredSourcePackage = re.findall(viewstatusFilter, self.text)
+ print bugnumber
+ print filteredSourcePackage
self.sourcepackage = filteredSourcePackage[0]
if cl.attachments:
--
Parsing multiple source packages in a bug
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79546
From ubuntu at alexm.org Tue Jan 16 14:08:53 2007
From: ubuntu at alexm.org (Alex Muntada)
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 14:08:53 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79546] Re: Parsing multiple source packages in a bug
References: <20070116140401.25421.62983.malonedeb@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070116140854.25421.72319.malone@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
I hope it's OK to set this fields myself... ;)
** Changed in: bughelper (upstream)
Importance: Undecided => High
Status: Unconfirmed => Confirmed
Target: None => 0.1
--
Parsing multiple source packages in a bug
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79546
From ubuntu at alexm.org Tue Jan 16 14:06:09 2007
From: ubuntu at alexm.org (Alex Muntada)
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 14:06:09 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79247] Re: bughelper fails when processing ubiquity
References: <20070114153627.25421.30338.malonedeb@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070116140609.20113.51205.malone@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Done
--
bughelper fails when processing ubiquity
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79247
From ubuntu at alexm.org Tue Jan 16 14:14:04 2007
From: ubuntu at alexm.org (Alex Muntada)
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 14:14:04 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79546] Re: Parsing multiple source packages in a bug
References: <20070116140401.25421.62983.malonedeb@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070116141404.25421.61341.launchpad@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
** Description changed:
Some bugs like bug 77442 have several source packages listed. If you
fetch https://launchpad.net/bugs/77442 the title shows only one if them,
so it can't be used to get the source package name, i.e.:
<title>Bug #77442 in vnc (Ubuntu): ...
Since there's different source packages for this bug there's also the
change to get a different name each time, depending on the fetching
method and LP behaviour. It seems that the last source package is
listed, but I could be wrong (maybe we should ask LP developers).
+
+ (Found while working on bug 79247: bughelper fails when processing
+ ubiquity)
** Description changed:
Some bugs like bug 77442 have several source packages listed. If you
fetch https://launchpad.net/bugs/77442 the title shows only one if them,
so it can't be used to get the source package name, i.e.:
<title>Bug #77442 in vnc (Ubuntu): ...
Since there's different source packages for this bug there's also the
change to get a different name each time, depending on the fetching
method and LP behaviour. It seems that the last source package is
listed, but I could be wrong (maybe we should ask LP developers).
- (Found while working on bug 79247: bughelper fails when processing
- ubiquity)
+ (Found while working on bug 79247)
--
Parsing multiple source packages in a bug
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79546
From ubuntu at alexm.org Tue Jan 16 14:26:43 2007
From: ubuntu at alexm.org (Alex Muntada)
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 14:26:43 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79157] Re: RFE: support local clue files
References: <20070113225823.25421.58908.malonedeb@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070116142644.20188.96148.malone@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Seems OK to me, but have a question:
> check os.path.isdir(sys.argv[x]) and use all the files in that
directory
Should that directory be traversed recursively or doesn't make sense to
have a package tree of clue files? A quick find for any *.info files
there would be easy to get if there's some "find" module for Python.
(I'm a Perl programmer, so don't tell anybody that I'm doing some Python
here ;)
--
RFE: support local clue files
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79157
From ubuntu at alexm.org Tue Jan 16 14:37:41 2007
From: ubuntu at alexm.org (Alex Muntada)
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 14:37:41 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79133] Re: RFE: Option to count comments
References: <20070113210431.25421.78854.malonedeb@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070116143741.25372.54393.malone@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
I don't think that having '-k' for 'count' is user-friendly enough. We
should look at other tools that could have similar options or use long
ones, as in GNU:
--count=5
--count=">5"
--count="<5"
--count-verbose=5
...
In the long term, long option names is far easier to maintain when
there's so many options to deal with.
--
RFE: Option to count comments
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79133
From daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com Tue Jan 16 15:44:47 2007
From: daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com (Daniel Holbach)
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 15:44:47 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79157] Re: RFE: support local clue files
References: <20070113225823.25421.58908.malonedeb@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070116154447.25372.2173.malone@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
os.walk() is easy to use - we can do recursively, although, as you say,
it probably won't make much sense (yet).
--
RFE: support local clue files
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79157
From daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com Tue Jan 16 15:40:55 2007
From: daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com (Daniel Holbach)
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 15:40:55 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79133] Re: RFE: Option to count comments
References: <20070113210431.25421.78854.malonedeb@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070116154055.25421.7690.malone@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
More opinions?
--
RFE: Option to count comments
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79133
From daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com Tue Jan 16 16:46:53 2007
From: daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com (Daniel Holbach)
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 16:46:53 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79546] Re: Parsing multiple source packages in a bug
References: <20070116140401.25421.62983.malonedeb@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070116164653.20113.93869.malone@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Thanks Alex - your fix did the change. I just pushed a fix to
~dholbach/bughelper/bughelper.dev - if somebody would like to review
it... :-)
Checking all the source packages involved should work now.
** Changed in: bughelper (upstream)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed
--
Parsing multiple source packages in a bug
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79546
From henrik at ubuntu.com Tue Jan 16 17:10:24 2007
From: henrik at ubuntu.com (Henrik Nilsen Omma)
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 17:10:24 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79133] Re: RFE: Option to count comments
References: <20070113210431.25421.78854.malonedeb@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070116171024.25372.61107.malone@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
I agree that we are probably better off starting with verbose switches
and then decide on the short ones once the options have settled down.
--
RFE: Option to count comments
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79133
From henrik at ubuntu.com Tue Jan 16 17:13:26 2007
From: henrik at ubuntu.com (Henrik Nilsen Omma)
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 17:13:26 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79157] Re: RFE: support local clue files
References: <20070113225823.25421.58908.malonedeb@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070116171326.25421.53805.malone@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
To clarify was that in the command you originally listed:
bughelper -r <dir>
you omitted the package name which would only make sense if there was
only one clue file in that dir.
bughelper -r <dir> packagename
would be correct. Other than that, I'm happy :)
--
RFE: support local clue files
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79157
From daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com Tue Jan 16 19:51:34 2007
From: daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com (Daniel Holbach)
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 19:51:34 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79157] Re: RFE: support local clue files
References: <20070113225823.25421.58908.malonedeb@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070116195134.20188.28006.malone@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Ok, an example of what I thought:
bughelper -r gcalctool.info
(that should be clear enough)
bughelper -r test_packages/
(which contains metacity.info, xserver-xorg.info and beryl.info, should be clear enough too)
I don't see why we need the <packagename> argument.
--
RFE: support local clue files
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79157
From daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com Tue Jan 16 19:51:57 2007
From: daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com (Daniel Holbach)
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 19:51:57 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79133] Re: RFE: Option to count comments
References: <20070113210431.25421.78854.malonedeb@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070116195157.20113.49200.malone@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Ok. I'm happy with that.
** Changed in: bughelper (upstream)
Status: Needs Info => Confirmed
--
RFE: Option to count comments
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79133
From henrik at ubuntu.com Tue Jan 16 20:22:50 2007
From: henrik at ubuntu.com (Henrik Nilsen Omma)
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 20:22:50 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79157] Re: RFE: support local clue files
References: <20070113225823.25421.58908.malonedeb@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070116202250.20188.69898.malone@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
So in your first example bughelper to look up stuff on gcalctool, using
the file you provided.
In the second example it would process all three packages in one single
run. If that's the behaviour you intended then that's fine. I guess that
was the whole point :)
It does mean that you cannot use 'my-really-cool-clue-file-
version3.info' though, which is probably just as well.
--
RFE: support local clue files
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79157
From pandisv at yahoo.co.uk Tue Jan 16 20:55:59 2007
From: pandisv at yahoo.co.uk (Vassilis Pandis)
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 20:55:59 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79140] Re: RFE: Rank bugs by number of dupes
References: <20070113215955.5371.39011.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070116205559.20188.5809.malone@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
The regular expression needs a bit of fixing, but otherwise I _guess_
this should be alright. Patch with -p1
** Attachment added: "patch that probably implements this"
http://librarian.launchpad.net/5773967/bug.patch
--
RFE: Rank bugs by number of dupes
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79140
From daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com Tue Jan 16 21:22:44 2007
From: daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com (Daniel Holbach)
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 21:22:44 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79157] Re: RFE: support local clue files
References: <20070113225823.25421.58908.malonedeb@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070116212244.20188.77815.malone@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Ok, now I see your point. For the last case we could probably add a
<sourcepackage> tag to the XML files and wouldn't have to care about
names of files anymore.
--
RFE: support local clue files
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79157
From brian at murraytwins.com Tue Jan 16 22:24:57 2007
From: brian at murraytwins.com (Brian Murray)
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 14:24:57 -0800
Subject: [Bug 79231] Re: RFE: print bughelper version
In-Reply-To: <20070116132113.20113.60616.malone@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
References: <20070114133928.5371.68136.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
<20070116132113.20113.60616.malone@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070116142457.0f69aa02@flash>
On Tue, 16 Jan 2007 13:21:13 -0000
Daniel Holbach <daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com> wrote:
> I just pushed the changes to ~bugsquad/bughelper/bughelper.main -
> thanks a lot Dean for working on this! You ROCK!
>
> If somebody could update the wiki pages and documentation that refers
> to the command line, that'd be swell.
>
I updated the wiki pages. I also believe I updated and pushed changes
dealing with the "-V" switch to launchpad. You should be able to find
it here:
https://code.launchpad.net/~brian-murray/+branch/bughelper/bughelper.dev
Brian
From brian at murraytwins.com Tue Jan 16 22:24:57 2007
From: brian at murraytwins.com (Brian)
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 22:24:57 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79231] Re: RFE: print bughelper version
References: <20070114133928.5371.68136.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
<20070116132113.20113.60616.malone@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070116142457.0f69aa02@flash>
On Tue, 16 Jan 2007 13:21:13 -0000
Daniel Holbach <daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com> wrote:
> I just pushed the changes to ~bugsquad/bughelper/bughelper.main -
> thanks a lot Dean for working on this! You ROCK!
>
> If somebody could update the wiki pages and documentation that refers
> to the command line, that'd be swell.
>
I updated the wiki pages. I also believe I updated and pushed changes
dealing with the "-V" switch to launchpad. You should be able to find
it here:
https://code.launchpad.net/~brian-murray/+branch/bughelper/bughelper.dev
Brian
--
RFE: print bughelper version
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79231
From dean at deansas.org Wed Jan 17 00:06:50 2007
From: dean at deansas.org (Dean Sas)
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 00:06:50 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79147] Re: Source package search name validation
References: <20070113222458.5477.51468.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070117000650.20188.87656.malone@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
I've done the first part in r26 of my branch
(~dsas/bughelper/bughelper.dev).
I'm not sure if python-apt has a "search cache for string" function, I
couldn't find one but it's easy to iterate through the apt cache and do
it, just thought a python-apt way may be more efficient.
--
Source package search name validation
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79147
From pandisv at yahoo.co.uk Wed Jan 17 11:16:54 2007
From: pandisv at yahoo.co.uk (Vassilis Pandis)
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 11:16:54 -0000
Subject: [Bug 80226] bughelper crashes on ubiquity [daniel's branch]
References: <20070117111654.25421.66847.malonedeb@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070117111654.25421.66847.malonedeb@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Public bug reported:
This is with r23 of Daniel's branch. ubiquity.info validates (it's the
stock one)
pandis at pandis-laptop:~/bughelper$ ./bughelper ubiquity
I/O warning : failed to load external entity "packages/initramfs-tools.info"
I/O warning : failed to load external entity "packages/linux-source-2.6.15.info"
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "./bughelper", line 53, in ?
main()
File "./bughelper", line 43, in main
if info_file.clue_matches(clue, b.text):
File "/home/pandis/bughelper/bugHelper/infoFiles.py", line 33, in clue_matches
return self.condition_matches(condition, text)
File "/home/pandis/bughelper/bugHelper/infoFiles.py", line 51, in condition_matches
if len(cond.or_cond):
TypeError: len() of unsized object
pandis at pandis-laptop:~/bughelper$ ./bughelper -l http://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bugs
I/O warning : failed to load external entity "packages/initramfs-tools.info"
I/O warning : failed to load external entity "packages/linux-source-2.6.15.info"
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "./bughelper", line 53, in ?
main()
File "./bughelper", line 43, in main
if info_file.clue_matches(clue, b.text):
File "/home/pandis/bughelper/bugHelper/infoFiles.py", line 33, in clue_matches
return self.condition_matches(condition, text)
File "/home/pandis/bughelper/bugHelper/infoFiles.py", line 51, in condition_matches
if len(cond.or_cond):
TypeError: len() of unsized object
** Affects: bughelper (upstream)
Importance: Undecided
Status: Unconfirmed
--
bughelper crashes on ubiquity [daniel's branch]
https://launchpad.net/bugs/80226
From daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com Wed Jan 17 11:41:25 2007
From: daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com (Daniel Holbach)
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 11:41:25 -0000
Subject: [Bug 80226] Re: bughelper crashes on ubiquity [daniel's branch]
References: <20070117111654.25421.66847.malonedeb@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070117114125.25372.30493.malone@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
I can't reproduce the crash over here. Can you add a
print cond.or_cond
before line 51 in bugHelper/infoFiles.py?
** Changed in: bughelper (upstream)
Importance: Undecided => High
Status: Unconfirmed => Needs Info
--
bughelper crashes on ubiquity [daniel's branch]
https://launchpad.net/bugs/80226
From daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com Wed Jan 17 11:52:49 2007
From: daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com (Daniel Holbach)
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 11:52:49 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79231] Re: RFE: print bughelper version
References: <20070114133928.5371.68136.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070117115250.20113.22185.malone@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Thanks Brian, I did a few changes and committed it to
~bugsquad/bughelper/bughelper.main
--
RFE: print bughelper version
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79231
From pandisv at yahoo.co.uk Wed Jan 17 12:00:27 2007
From: pandisv at yahoo.co.uk (Vassilis Pandis)
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 12:00:27 -0000
Subject: [Bug 80226] Re: bughelper crashes on ubiquity [daniel's branch]
References: <20070117111654.25421.66847.malonedeb@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070117120027.20188.13055.malone@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
'None'
pandis at pandis-laptop:~/bughelper$ ./bughelper ubiquity
I/O warning : failed to load external entity "packages/initramfs-tools.info"
I/O warning : failed to load external entity "packages/linux-source-2.6.15.info"
None
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "./bughelper", line 47, in ?
main()
File "./bughelper", line 37, in main
if info_file.clue_matches(clue, b.text):
File "/home/pandis/bughelper/bugHelper/infoFiles.py", line 33, in clue_matches
return self.condition_matches(condition, text)
File "/home/pandis/bughelper/bugHelper/infoFiles.py", line 51, in condition_matches
if len(cond.or_cond):
TypeError: len() of unsized object
--
bughelper crashes on ubiquity [daniel's branch]
https://launchpad.net/bugs/80226
From daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com Wed Jan 17 12:07:50 2007
From: daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com (Daniel Holbach)
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 12:07:50 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79147] Re: Source package search name validation
References: <20070113222458.5477.51468.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070117120750.25372.91662.malone@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Thanks for the fix, works nicely - did only some small changes to it and
committed it to ~bugsquad/bughelper/bughelper.main
Do you think we can shut up apt's messages:
"""Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done""" somehow? Maybe ask Michael Vogt.
** Changed in: bughelper (upstream)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
Assignee: (unassigned) => Dean Sas
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
Source package search name validation
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79147
From daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com Wed Jan 17 12:17:55 2007
From: daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com (Daniel Holbach)
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 12:17:55 -0000
Subject: [Bug 80226] Re: bughelper crashes on ubiquity [daniel's branch]
References: <20070117111654.25421.66847.malonedeb@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070117121756.25372.86912.malone@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Fixed by:
=== modified file 'bugHelper/infoFiles.py'
--- bugHelper/infoFiles.py 2007-01-16 11:57:57 +0000
+++ bugHelper/infoFiles.py 2007-01-17 12:11:53 +0000
@@ -43,12 +43,12 @@
return cond.not_cond != \
(text.count(cond.simple_cond)>0)
- if len(cond.and_cond):
+ if cond.and_cond:
return len(cond.and_cond) == \
[self.condition_matches(n, text) \
for n in cond.and_cond].count(True)
- if len(cond.or_cond):
+ if cond.or_cond:
return [self.condition_matches(n, text) \
for n in cond.or_cond].count(True)
Thanks Vassilis, committed to ~bugsquad/bughelper/bughelper.main
** Changed in: bughelper (upstream)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Daniel Holbach
Status: Needs Info => Fix Released
--
bughelper crashes on ubiquity [daniel's branch]
https://launchpad.net/bugs/80226
From dean at deansas.org Wed Jan 17 14:09:28 2007
From: dean at deansas.org (Dean Sas)
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 14:09:28 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79147] Re: Source package search name validation
References: <20070113222458.5477.51468.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070117140928.20188.14731.malone@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Done in r28 of my branch ~dsas/bughelper/bughelper.dev This should be
quicker too, we're using the existing apt cache rather than creating a
new one...I think (python-apt docs are nonexistent).
The same fix could be done for bug #79231. I'll probably do that tonight
or tomorrow unless someone beats me to it.
--
Source package search name validation
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79147
From matsubara at async.com.br Wed Jan 17 17:57:10 2007
From: matsubara at async.com.br (Diogo Matsubara)
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 17:57:10 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79215] Re: RFE: port command line parsing to something sane
References: <20070114115830.5477.44398.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070117175710.20188.59616.malone@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Hello Daniel,
we use optparse for some scripts in Launchpad and it works really well.
http://docs.python.org/lib/module-optparse.html
Hope that helps.
--
RFE: port command line parsing to something sane
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79215
From daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com Wed Jan 17 18:26:31 2007
From: daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com (Daniel Holbach)
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 18:26:31 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79222] Re: RFE: add documentation to bughelper
References: <20070114124018.5477.36514.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070117182631.25421.68178.launchpad@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
** Changed in: bughelper (upstream)
Target: None => 0.1
--
RFE: add documentation to bughelper
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79222
From daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com Wed Jan 17 18:26:44 2007
From: daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com (Daniel Holbach)
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 18:26:44 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79218] Re: RFE: Write manpages for bughelper suite
References: <20070114121534.5371.23727.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070117182644.20113.12149.launchpad@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
** Changed in: bughelper (upstream)
Target: None => 0.1
--
RFE: Write manpages for bughelper suite
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79218
From daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com Wed Jan 17 18:27:10 2007
From: daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com (Daniel Holbach)
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 18:27:10 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79220] Re: RFE: automate simple adding and changing of info clues
References: <20070114122658.5477.90505.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070117182710.20188.94684.launchpad@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
** Changed in: bughelper (upstream)
Target: None => 0.1
--
RFE: automate simple adding and changing of info clues
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79220
From daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com Wed Jan 17 18:27:22 2007
From: daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com (Daniel Holbach)
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 18:27:22 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79150] Re: Don't dupe on multiple finds
References: <20070113224107.25421.98996.malonedeb@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070117182722.25372.48200.launchpad@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
** Changed in: bughelper (upstream)
Importance: Undecided => High
Target: None => 0.1
--
Don't dupe on multiple finds
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79150
From daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com Wed Jan 17 18:25:35 2007
From: daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com (Daniel Holbach)
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 18:25:35 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79147] Re: Source package search name validation
References: <20070113222458.5477.51468.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070117182535.20188.91365.malone@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Pushed to ~bugsquad/bughelper/bughelper.main - thanks again.
--
Source package search name validation
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79147
From dean at deansas.org Wed Jan 17 18:39:21 2007
From: dean at deansas.org (Dean Sas)
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 18:39:21 -0000
Subject: [Bug 80288] bughelper should use it's own user-agent
References: <20070117183921.25372.81104.malonedeb@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070117183921.25372.81104.malonedeb@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Public bug reported:
bughelper should use it's own HTTP user-agent to help LP with statistics
and stuff.
It should probably be of the form: "bughelper/<version> (<urllib
standard reply>)
** Affects: bughelper (upstream)
Importance: Undecided
Status: Unconfirmed
** Affects: bughelper 0.x (upstream)
Importance: Undecided
Status: Unconfirmed
** Tags added: bitesize
** Description changed:
bughelper should use it's own HTTP user-agent to help LP with statistics
and stuff.
+
+ It should probably be of the form: "bughelper/<version> (<urllib
+ standard reply>)
--
bughelper should use it's own user-agent
https://launchpad.net/bugs/80288
From dean at deansas.org Wed Jan 17 19:08:22 2007
From: dean at deansas.org (Dean Sas)
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 19:08:22 -0000
Subject: [Bug 80288] Re: bughelper should use it's own user-agent
References: <20070117183921.25372.81104.malonedeb@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070117190822.20113.28685.launchpad@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
** Changed in: bughelper (upstream)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Dean Sas
Status: Unconfirmed => In Progress
--
bughelper should use it's own user-agent
https://launchpad.net/bugs/80288
From daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com Wed Jan 17 19:07:20 2007
From: daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com (Daniel Holbach)
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 19:07:20 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79220] Re: RFE: automate simple adding and changing of info clues
References: <20070114122658.5477.90505.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070117190720.20188.90867.malone@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Fix committed in ~dholbach/bughelper/bughelper.dev - please test.
** Changed in: bughelper (upstream)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Daniel Holbach
Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed
--
RFE: automate simple adding and changing of info clues
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79220
From daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com Wed Jan 17 19:09:59 2007
From: daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com (Daniel Holbach)
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 19:09:59 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79220] Re: RFE: automate simple adding and changing of info clues
References: <20070114122658.5477.90505.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070117190959.25421.49714.malone@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
This needs documentation, especially the use of ticks around the
arguments.
** Tags added: documentation
--
RFE: automate simple adding and changing of info clues
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79220
From dean at deansas.org Wed Jan 17 19:15:28 2007
From: dean at deansas.org (Dean Sas)
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 19:15:28 -0000
Subject: [Bug 80288] Re: bughelper should use it's own user-agent
References: <20070117183921.25372.81104.malonedeb@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070117191528.25372.82809.malone@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
In my repo (~dsas/bughelper/bughelper.dev) as r29
--
bughelper should use it's own user-agent
https://launchpad.net/bugs/80288
From daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com Wed Jan 17 19:27:58 2007
From: daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com (Daniel Holbach)
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 19:27:58 -0000
Subject: [Bug 80288] Re: bughelper should use it's own user-agent
References: <20070117183921.25372.81104.malonedeb@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070117192758.25372.88231.malone@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Committed to ~bugsquad/bughelper/bughelper.main - awesome work, Dean!
** Changed in: bughelper 0.x (upstream)
Status: Unconfirmed => Rejected
** Changed in: bughelper (upstream)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
Status: In Progress => Fix Released
Target: None => 0.1
--
bughelper should use it's own user-agent
https://launchpad.net/bugs/80288
From daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com Wed Jan 17 19:48:59 2007
From: daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com (Daniel Holbach)
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 19:48:59 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79220] Re: RFE: automate simple adding and changing of info clues
References: <20070114122658.5477.90505.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070117194859.20188.74.malone@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Fix available in ~bugsquad/bughelper/bughelper.main - but please make
use of it and report back. :-)
** Changed in: bughelper (upstream)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
RFE: automate simple adding and changing of info clues
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79220
From dktrkranz at linuxdc.it Wed Jan 17 20:17:42 2007
From: dktrkranz at linuxdc.it (Luca Falavigna)
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 20:17:42 -0000
Subject: [Bug 80307] Please adjust "failed to load external entity" error
message
References: <20070117201742.20188.75247.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070117201742.20188.75247.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Public bug reported:
When searching for bugs in source packages which ships multiple tasks, bughelper fails with "failed to load external entity" error messages.
It is not very clear and should be changed to something more intuitive.
** Affects: bughelper (upstream)
Importance: Undecided
Status: Unconfirmed
--
Please adjust "failed to load external entity" error message
https://launchpad.net/bugs/80307
From daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com Thu Jan 18 09:50:14 2007
From: daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com (Daniel Holbach)
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 09:50:14 -0000
Subject: [Bug 80307] Re: Please adjust "failed to load external entity" error
message
References: <20070117201742.20188.75247.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070118095015.25421.14521.malone@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Marking as 0.1 bitesize task.
** Changed in: bughelper (upstream)
Importance: Undecided => Low
Status: Unconfirmed => Confirmed
Target: None => 0.1
** Tags added: bitesize xml
--
Please adjust "failed to load external entity" error message
https://launchpad.net/bugs/80307
From daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com Thu Jan 18 12:00:25 2007
From: daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com (Daniel Holbach)
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 13:00:25 +0100
Subject: bughelper meeting (was Re: bughelper knows new cluefiles!)
In-Reply-To: <1168766329.18880.29.camel@lovegood>
References: <1168623803.25226.6.camel@lovegood>
<20070112215139.eldGr.alexm@alexm.org>
<1168766329.18880.29.camel@lovegood>
Message-ID: <1169121625.29449.1.camel@lovegood>
Hello,
On So, 2007-01-14 at 10:18 +0100, Daniel Holbach wrote:
> We can try to do a focused Q&A session on IRC on
> Thursday Jan 18th on #ubuntu-bugs on irc.freenode.net at 15:00 UTC
let's move to #ubuntu-meeting. Seems we have increased bug reporting
activity going on, so the bug notification might be a bit disturbing.
Sorry for the short notice.
Have a nice day,
Daniel
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-bugsquad/attachments/20070118/88f76c8f/attachment.sig>
From ubuntu at alexm.org Thu Jan 18 15:12:53 2007
From: ubuntu at alexm.org (Alex Muntada)
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 15:12:53 -0000
Subject: [Bug 80453] You must put some 'source' URIs in your sources.list
References: <20070118151253.6760.15331.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070118151253.6760.15331.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Public bug reported:
When /etc/apt/sources.list does not list the deb-src entries, bughelper
gives an error like this:
$ ./bughelper vino
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "./bughelper", line 58, in ?
main()
File "./bughelper", line 34, in main
if not utils.package_exists(cl.sourcepackage):
File "/home/alexm/ubuntu/bughelper/bughelper.main/bugHelper/utils.py", line 25, in package_exists
sources = apt_pkg.GetPkgSrcRecords()
SystemError: E:You must put some 'source' URIs in your sources.list
This error should be catched and reported nicely.
** Affects: bughelper (upstream)
Importance: Medium
Status: Confirmed
** Changed in: bughelper (upstream)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
Status: Unconfirmed => Confirmed
** Tags added: bitesize
--
You must put some 'source' URIs in your sources.list
https://launchpad.net/bugs/80453
From ubuntu at alexm.org Thu Jan 18 15:43:29 2007
From: ubuntu at alexm.org (Alex Muntada)
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 15:43:29 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79218] Re: RFE: Write manpages for bughelper suite
References: <20070114121534.5371.23727.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070118154329.6655.27285.launchpad@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
** Changed in: bughelper (upstream)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Alex Muntada
** Changed in: bughelper (upstream)
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
--
RFE: Write manpages for bughelper suite
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79218
From ubuntu at alexm.org Thu Jan 18 15:49:21 2007
From: ubuntu at alexm.org (Alex Muntada)
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 15:49:21 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79222] Re: RFE: add documentation to bughelper
References: <20070114124018.5477.36514.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070118154921.6655.45054.launchpad@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
** Changed in: bughelper (upstream)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Alex Muntada
--
RFE: add documentation to bughelper
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79222
From daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com Thu Jan 18 15:45:40 2007
From: daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com (Daniel Holbach)
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 15:45:40 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79151] Re: support global clues
References: <20070113224704.25421.5806.malonedeb@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070118154540.31571.80941.launchpad@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
** Changed in: bughelper (upstream)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
Target: None => 0.1
--
support global clues
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79151
From daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com Thu Jan 18 16:11:53 2007
From: daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com (Daniel Holbach)
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 17:11:53 +0100
Subject: bughelper meeting (was Re: bughelper knows new cluefiles!)
In-Reply-To: <1168779286.5418.14.camel@lovegood>
References: <1168623803.25226.6.camel@lovegood>
<20070112215139.eldGr.alexm@alexm.org>
<1168766329.18880.29.camel@lovegood>
<1168776437.5418.7.camel@lovegood> <1168778037.14938.3.camel@localhost>
<1168779286.5418.14.camel@lovegood>
Message-ID: <1169136713.6485.3.camel@localhost>
Hello everybody,
On So, 2007-01-14 at 13:54 +0100, Daniel Holbach wrote:
> Sure, no problem. I'll add it to the BugHelper/ wiki namespace and post
> the link on the list.
I added the log to: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/BugHelper/Dev/Meetings
Have a nice day,
Daniel
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-bugsquad/attachments/20070118/611a5612/attachment.sig>
From fernando at staff.nerdgroup.org Thu Jan 18 16:16:55 2007
From: fernando at staff.nerdgroup.org (Fernando Ribeiro)
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 16:16:55 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79215] Re: RFE: port command line parsing to something sane
References: <20070114115830.5477.44398.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070118161655.31292.17682.malone@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
I'm rewriting to use optparse now.
--
RFE: port command line parsing to something sane
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79215
From daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com Thu Jan 18 17:13:00 2007
From: daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com (Daniel Holbach)
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 18:13:00 +0100
Subject: Bughelper: ./HACKING
Message-ID: <1169140380.11868.11.camel@lovegood>
Hello everybody,
I just talked a big to Diogo Matsubara - for those who don't know him
yet: he's Launchpad hacker extraordinaire. He was kind enough to follow
the bughelper discussion and look a bit at our code. He said he'd
recommend two things to us:
* Sticking to PEP 8 (http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0008/)
when doing reviews.
* Doing Test Driven Development.
I don't know much about TDD, so if anybody has expertise there, let's
try to change our workflow.
But more importantly: About PEP-8: I'm happy to try to stick to that. If
anybody wants to PEP-8-ify my python code, he's happy to do so. I'd call
my Python code dirty as well - no offense taken. :-)
Have a nice day,
Daniel
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-bugsquad/attachments/20070118/ad2abd6d/attachment.sig>
From fernando at staff.nerdgroup.org Thu Jan 18 20:48:20 2007
From: fernando at staff.nerdgroup.org (Fernando Ribeiro)
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 20:48:20 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79215] Re: RFE: port command line parsing to something sane
References: <20070114115830.5477.44398.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070118204820.6760.88219.malone@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
First patch using optparse.
Can somebody to test it?
It have new options (use --help for verbose).
** Attachment added: "command line parse (optparse)"
http://librarian.launchpad.net/5786648/bughelper.main-patch-optparse.diff
--
RFE: port command line parsing to something sane
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79215
From fernando at staff.nerdgroup.org Thu Jan 18 20:52:32 2007
From: fernando at staff.nerdgroup.org (Fernando Ribeiro)
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 20:52:32 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79215] Re: RFE: port command line parsing to something sane
References: <20070114115830.5477.44398.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070118205232.31571.46893.malone@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
new patch without binary and backup =)
** Attachment added: "command line parse (optparse) v0.1"
http://librarian.launchpad.net/5786688/bughelper.main-patch-optparse.diff
--
RFE: port command line parsing to something sane
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79215
From daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com Fri Jan 19 08:29:21 2007
From: daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com (Daniel Holbach)
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 08:29:21 -0000
Subject: [Bug 80453] Re: You must put some 'source' URIs in your sources.list
References: <20070118151253.6760.15331.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070119082921.31292.81542.launchpad@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
** Changed in: bughelper (upstream)
Importance: Medium => Low
Target: None => 0.1
--
You must put some 'source' URIs in your sources.list
https://launchpad.net/bugs/80453
From kamping_kaiser at internode.on.net Fri Jan 19 11:38:39 2007
From: kamping_kaiser at internode.on.net (KarlGoetz)
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 11:38:39 -0000
Subject: [Bug 80453] Re: You must put some 'source' URIs in
your sources.list
References: <20070118151253.6760.15331.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
<20070119082921.31292.81542.launchpad@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <1169206719.4530.4.camel@Evangelion>
On Fri, 2007-01-19 at 08:29 +0000, Daniel Holbach wrote:
> ** Changed in: bughelper (upstream)
> Importance: Medium => Low
> Target: None => 0.1
>
> --
> You must put some 'source' URIs in your sources.list
> https://launchpad.net/bugs/80453
>
surely forcing people to have deb-src lines is a bad thing (commented or
not)? i dont have them on my non-dev systems.
--
You must put some 'source' URIs in your sources.list
https://launchpad.net/bugs/80453
From daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com Fri Jan 19 15:29:00 2007
From: daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com (Daniel Holbach)
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 15:29:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79215] Re: RFE: port command line parsing to something sane
References: <20070114115830.5477.44398.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070119152900.5640.27177.malone@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Thanks a lot Fernando: awesome work. I committed a modified version to
~dholbach/bughelper/bughelper.dev - please everybody test and check.
Some minor nitpicks:
- please use an indentation level of 4 spaces (PEP-8 wants that too and we use it throughout)
- please makes lines only max. 79 chars long
- I added your name to the contributors list instead of adding it to the header file and also mentioned you in the commit log - I hope that's ok for you
- and also changed the variable names in a few places to make it more consistent
One change I committed with this change is Sébastien's request to drop
the '-a' option. We do '--all' pages by default now.
(The command line options changed in a few places as well - please take
care of that in the documentation - Alex Muntada?)
Thanks again Fernando - nice work.
** Changed in: bughelper (upstream)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed
--
RFE: port command line parsing to something sane
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79215
From daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com Fri Jan 19 17:03:21 2007
From: daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com (Daniel Holbach)
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 17:03:21 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79150] Re: Don't dupe on multiple finds
References: <20070113224107.25421.98996.malonedeb@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070119170321.5640.52629.malone@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
In ~dholbach/bughelper/bughelper.dev:
------------------------------------------------------------
revno: 33
committer: Daniel Holbach <daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com>
branch nick: bughelper.dev
timestamp: Fri 2007-01-19 18:01:44 +0100
message:
committed fix for 79150 also format the output a bit
------------------------------------------------------------
Somebody please review and merge into ~bugsquad/bughelper/bughelper.main
** Changed in: bughelper (upstream)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Daniel Holbach
Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed
--
Don't dupe on multiple finds
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79150
From daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com Fri Jan 19 17:07:24 2007
From: daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com (Daniel Holbach)
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 17:07:24 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79157] Re: RFE: support local clue files
References: <20070113225823.25421.58908.malonedeb@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070119170724.26513.73030.malone@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Turning into a 0.1 bug. It's nice for people who have bughelper
installed as a package and add local clues as they go along.
I'm not sure we need a new XML tag though.
~/bughelper/packages/totem.info should be 'just added' to the clues of
/usr/share/bughelper/packages/totem.info.
Any opinions on this?
** Changed in: bughelper (upstream)
Importance: Wishlist => Medium
Status: Needs Info => Confirmed
Target: None => 0.1
--
RFE: support local clue files
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79157
From dean at deansas.org Fri Jan 19 18:22:16 2007
From: dean at deansas.org (Dean Sas)
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 18:22:16 -0000
Subject: [Bug 80453] Re: You must put some 'source' URIs in your sources.list
References: <20070118151253.6760.15331.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070119182216.26752.47663.malone@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
I don't know what the problem is with having them on production systems,
could you let us know?
In addition isn't bug triage a "dev" thing to do?
--
You must put some 'source' URIs in your sources.list
https://launchpad.net/bugs/80453
From daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com Fri Jan 19 18:44:45 2007
From: daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com (Daniel Holbach)
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 19:44:45 +0100
Subject: [bughelper] Local caching of bug attachments
Message-ID: <1169232285.9752.6.camel@localhost>
Hello everybody,
I just committed a patch to ~dholbach/bughelper/bughelper.dev which
saves bug attachments (with content-type text/plain) to
~/.bughelper/attachments-cache/, so they're not downloaded over and over
again.
------------------------------------------------------------
revno: 34
committer: Daniel Holbach <daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com>
branch nick: bughelper.dev
timestamp: Fri 2007-01-19 19:36:59 +0100
message:
implemented local caching of bug attachments
------------------------------------------------------------
I'd appreciate it, if somebody of the team reviewed the patch and
committed it to ~bugsqad/bughelper/bughelper.main
I CCed Launchpad-Users and Colin, because they're likely to be
interested.
Have a nice day,
Daniel
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-bugsquad/attachments/20070119/5dba3dbc/attachment.sig>
From dean at deansas.org Fri Jan 19 20:59:31 2007
From: dean at deansas.org (Dean Sas)
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 20:59:31 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79150] Re: Don't dupe on multiple finds
References: <20070113224107.25421.98996.malonedeb@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070119205931.5252.33660.malone@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Reviewed and merged. Thanks Daniel!
** Changed in: bughelper (upstream)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
Don't dupe on multiple finds
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79150
From dean at deansas.org Fri Jan 19 21:01:08 2007
From: dean at deansas.org (Dean Sas)
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 21:01:08 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79215] Re: RFE: port command line parsing to something sane
References: <20070114115830.5477.44398.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070119210108.26752.17362.malone@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Reviewed and merged, thanks again Fernando and dholbach
** Changed in: bughelper (upstream)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
RFE: port command line parsing to something sane
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79215
From pochu27 at gmail.com Sat Jan 20 01:11:17 2007
From: pochu27 at gmail.com (Emilio Pozuelo Monfort)
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 02:11:17 +0100
Subject: Joining the BugSquad
Message-ID: <45B16C35.9000605@gmail.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi everybody!
I'm Emilio Pozuelo, pochu at launchpad, IRC and ubuntuforums, and I'm a
user of Ubuntu since December 2005.
I have helped with bugs for some time, and would like to join the
bugsquad. I hope to be here and help with bugs everything I can.
Best Regards
Pochu
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFFsWw0PHB1VjBTaKERAixcAKCI5qlieCyUhNUPZ0s7Z/Q6crmIuwCgtPGu
IH14WnGu+6clUX18HIXoVXQ=
=s2+d
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
From dktrkranz at linuxdc.it Sat Jan 20 01:19:43 2007
From: dktrkranz at linuxdc.it (Luca Falavigna)
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 01:19:43 -0000
Subject: [Bug 80307] Re: Please adjust "failed to load external entity" error
message
References: <20070117201742.20188.75247.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070120011943.5640.67453.malone@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Attached patch should fix this.
** Attachment added: "80307.patch"
http://librarian.launchpad.net/5801748/80307.patch
--
Please adjust "failed to load external entity" error message
https://launchpad.net/bugs/80307
From sfllaw at ubuntu.com Sat Jan 20 01:32:22 2007
From: sfllaw at ubuntu.com (Simon Law)
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 20:32:22 -0500
Subject: Joining the BugSquad
In-Reply-To: <45B16C35.9000605@gmail.com>
References: <45B16C35.9000605@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20070120013222.GW11878@law.yi.org>
On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 02:11:17AM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> I'm Emilio Pozuelo, pochu at launchpad, IRC and ubuntuforums, and I'm a
> user of Ubuntu since December 2005.
>
> I have helped with bugs for some time, and would like to join the
> bugsquad. I hope to be here and help with bugs everything I can.
Welcome! I see that you're on #ubuntu-bugs and am glad you're here to
help out.
Cheers,
--
Simon Law http://www.law.yi.org/~sfllaw/
From daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com Sat Jan 20 07:29:32 2007
From: daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com (Daniel Holbach)
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 07:29:32 -0000
Subject: [Bug 80307] Re: Please adjust "failed to load external entity" error
message
References: <20070117201742.20188.75247.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070120072932.26513.32220.malone@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Well done, Luca.
I'd personally just change the "please create a new one using bugxml
command" to "consult bugxml(1) on how to create one" or "check README on
how to create on".
Let's take totem as an example: if you check it with bughelper you will
find that some of its bugs have tasks open on xserver-xorg-video-i810
and others. You're not necessarily always in the position to write a
.info file on that.
Does that make sense?
--
Please adjust "failed to load external entity" error message
https://launchpad.net/bugs/80307
From ash211 at gmail.com Sat Jan 20 08:32:02 2007
From: ash211 at gmail.com (Andrew Ash)
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 08:32:02 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79142] Re: RFE: Read and write text files with bug numbers
References: <20070113220536.5477.55657.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070120083203.5252.34881.malone@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
I thought I'd take a stab at this one. The easiest part to implement
seemed to be changing the output format, so that's all that this patch
includes. It's currently in this form:
bughelper [--version]
bughelper [-A] [--format=<plain|html|wiki>] [-p <source package>]
bughelper [-A] [--format=<plain|html|wiki>] [-l <Launchpad-URL>]
It now outputs in these forms:
<a href="http://launchpad.net/bugs/43050">Bug 43050 </a> - Vino crasher bugs<br />
{{{[http://launchpad.net/bugs/43050 bug #43050] - Vino crasher bugs}}}
http://launchpad.net/bugs/43050 - Vino crasher bugs
I'm sure the patch needs more work done, but I'm putting it out here in case anyone's looking for a starting point on this one.
** Attachment added: "add --format option"
http://librarian.launchpad.net/5804453/outputformats.diff
--
RFE: Read and write text files with bug numbers
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79142
From guillaume.archambaud at gmail.com Sat Jan 20 08:44:26 2007
From: guillaume.archambaud at gmail.com (Guillaume ARCHAMBAUD)
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 08:44:26 -0000
Subject: [Bug 80453] Re: You must put some 'source' URIs in your sources.list
References: <20070118151253.6760.15331.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070120084426.5640.77574.malone@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Hello,
this patch catch the error.
** Attachment added: "80453.patch"
http://librarian.launchpad.net/5804458/80453.patch
--
You must put some 'source' URIs in your sources.list
https://launchpad.net/bugs/80453
From dktrkranz at linuxdc.it Sat Jan 20 09:56:22 2007
From: dktrkranz at linuxdc.it (Luca Falavigna)
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 09:56:22 -0000
Subject: [Bug 80307] Re: Please adjust "failed to load external entity" error
message
References: <20070117201742.20188.75247.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070120095622.5252.86880.malone@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
You're right, Daniel. Referring to bugxml manpage (when available) or
README is a win choice. Thanks!
--
Please adjust "failed to load external entity" error message
https://launchpad.net/bugs/80307
From ash211 at gmail.com Sat Jan 20 16:56:04 2007
From: ash211 at gmail.com (Andrew Ash)
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 16:56:04 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79142] Re: RFE: Read and write text files with bug numbers
References: <20070113220536.5477.55657.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070120165604.5252.29932.malone@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
** Attachment added: "Better-structured patch"
http://librarian.launchpad.net/5805415/outputformats2.diff
--
RFE: Read and write text files with bug numbers
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79142
From dean at deansas.org Sat Jan 20 19:48:10 2007
From: dean at deansas.org (Dean Sas)
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 19:48:10 -0000
Subject: [Bug 80453] Re: You must put some 'source' URIs in your sources.list
References: <20070118151253.6760.15331.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070120194810.5252.19285.malone@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Sweet, thank you very much for working on this patch Guillaume, I've
committed it to the main repository in revision 38.
Karl: If requiring uncommented sources lines to use bughelper is a
problem could you open another bug for that please?
** Changed in: bughelper (upstream)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You must put some 'source' URIs in your sources.list
https://launchpad.net/bugs/80453
From rouben at rouben.net Sun Jan 21 08:27:13 2007
From: rouben at rouben.net (Rouben)
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 03:27:13 -0500
Subject: [bug 51609] Help with bug, don't know how to proceed further
Message-ID: <daf11bd20701210027o62abeaf0q8f2a75f96eea7741@mail.gmail.com>
Hello folks!
I'm stuck with a bug (# 51609) and don't know how to proceed. The bug
started out as a translation bug, the catch is, however, that the
reporter is volunteering to correct the error. The problem? Adept
(package in question) is not registered with Rosetta. After some
wiki-ing, I figured that contacting the product registrant is the best
way to ask them to register the package with Rosetta... so, I tried
contacting the product registrant as well as anyone who is remotely
associated with Adept, but to no avail, I have yet to receive a
response.
Should I refer this issue upstream back to the KDE project? What is
the proper course of action in a case like this?
Thanks!
Rouben
From pandisv at yahoo.co.uk Sun Jan 21 10:22:29 2007
From: pandisv at yahoo.co.uk (Vassilis Pandis)
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 10:22:29 +0000 (GMT)
Subject: [bug 51609] Help with bug, don't know how to proceed further
In-Reply-To: <daf11bd20701210027o62abeaf0q8f2a75f96eea7741@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <124937.5891.qm@web25007.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
--- Rouben <rouben at rouben.net> wrote:
> Hello folks!
> Adept
> (package in question) is not registered with Rosetta. After some
> wiki-ing, I figured that contacting the product registrant is the best
> way to ask them to register the package with Rosetta... so, I tried
> contacting the product registrant as well as anyone who is remotely
> associated with Adept, but to no avail, I have yet to receive a
> response.
>
> Should I refer this issue upstream back to the KDE project? What is
> the proper course of action in a case like this?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Rouben
>
Hi,
I think it would be best if the reporter talked to upstream. Not everybody uses Rosetta.
Point the reporter upstream since others will benefit from the changes as well. Of course
my opinion is by no means authoritative :-)
Vassilis
___________________________________________________________
The all-new Yahoo! Mail goes wherever you go - free your email address from your Internet provider. http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html
From dean at deansas.org Sun Jan 21 10:54:35 2007
From: dean at deansas.org (Dean Sas)
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 10:54:35 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79146] Re: RFE: Caching of downloaded attachments
References: <20070113222222.25421.62872.malonedeb@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070121105435.5640.92026.malone@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
dholbach did this on Friday, I reviewed and merged Friday night. Thanks
Daniel!
** Changed in: bughelper (upstream)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
RFE: Caching of downloaded attachments
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79146
From towsonu2003 at gmail.com Sun Jan 21 19:23:58 2007
From: towsonu2003 at gmail.com (t u)
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 14:23:58 -0500
Subject: [bug 51609] Help with bug, don't know how to proceed further
In-Reply-To: <124937.5891.qm@web25007.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
References: <124937.5891.qm@web25007.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <45B3BDCE.306@gmail.com>
Vassilis Pandis wrote:
> --- Rouben <rouben at rouben.net> wrote:
>> I'm stuck with a bug (# 51609) and don't know how to proceed. The
>> bug started out as a translation bug, the catch is, however, that
>> the reporter is volunteering to correct the error. The problem?
>> Adept (package in question) is not registered with Rosetta. After
>> some wiki-ing, I figured that contacting the product registrant is
>> the best way to ask them to register the package with Rosetta...
>> so, I tried contacting the product registrant as well as anyone who
>> is remotely associated with Adept, but to no avail, I have yet to
>> receive a response. Should I refer this issue upstream back to the
>> KDE project? What is the proper course of action in a case like
>> this?
> I think it would be best if the reporter talked to upstream. Not
> everybody uses Rosetta. Point the reporter upstream since others will
> benefit from the changes as well. Of course my opinion is by no means
> authoritative :-)
You can contact the upstream on behalf of the reporter. What I see
usually is that the triager opens a bug report at upstream, refers to
the LP url, and tells upstream what the original reporter is
experiencing. Then you'll have to coordinate between the launchpad bug
report and the upstream bug report.
This way, you don't force your users to go out of their ways to fix
something.
It's also good to contact rosetta people (CC'ing), they might offer
better help than us.
Thanks.
From emilio at pozuelo.org Sat Jan 20 01:08:43 2007
From: emilio at pozuelo.org (Emilio Pozuelo Monfort)
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 02:08:43 +0100
Subject: Joining the BugSquad
Message-ID: <45B16B9B.3020005@pozuelo.org>
Hi everybody!
I'm Emilio Pozuelo, pochu at launchpad, IRC and ubuntuforums, and I'm a
user of Ubuntu since December 2005.
I have helped with bugs for some time, and would like to join the
bugsquad. I hope to be here and help with bugs everything I can.
Best Regards
Pochu
From jjesse at iserv.net Mon Jan 22 18:37:01 2007
From: jjesse at iserv.net (Jonathan Jesse)
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 13:37:01 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Question on bug #78539 Flash Drive Problem
Message-ID: <21072.198.105.65.197.1169491021.squirrel@webmail.iserv.net>
Good afternoon,
I have started to triag bug #78539,
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/78539, which talks about problems
mounting USB devices. The orginial requestor has mentioned the problem
only occurs when inserting a flash drive when logged in as root. I am
wondering since root is disabled by default if this is a bug that we need
to worry about or not?
Thanks,
--
Jonathan Jesse
From ubuntu at alexm.org Mon Jan 22 20:51:38 2007
From: ubuntu at alexm.org (Alex Muntada)
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 20:51:38 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79218] Re: RFE: Write manpages for bughelper suite
References: <20070114121534.5371.23727.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070122205138.5252.51434.malone@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
After figuring out how to get my own bzr branch and playing a little
with docbook manual pages, I finally have a working version available
in: ~alex.muntada/bughelper/bughelper.dev
Could someone review and merge it into main branch?
To produce the bughelper.1 manpage you'll need the docbook2x package and
run something like this:
cd debian && docbook2x-man bughelper.1.docbook && man ./bughelper.1
Now, I'd like to know if the bugxml and bugnumbers pages should be kept
separately or you think that it's fine to put them in the same file and
install them as symlinks (still dunno how to do it, but I'll find if
needed).
** Changed in: bughelper (upstream)
Status: In Progress => Needs Info
--
RFE: Write manpages for bughelper suite
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79218
From ubuntu at alexm.org Mon Jan 22 21:22:12 2007
From: ubuntu at alexm.org (Alex Muntada)
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 21:22:12 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79218] Re: RFE: Write manpages for bughelper suite
References: <20070114121534.5371.23727.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070122212212.7143.29567.malone@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Sorry, I committed the changes locally but I can't manage to push them
on Launchpad. Will tell you when done.
** Changed in: bughelper (upstream)
Status: Needs Info => In Progress
--
RFE: Write manpages for bughelper suite
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79218
From dean at deansas.org Mon Jan 22 21:35:30 2007
From: dean at deansas.org (Dean Sas)
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 21:35:30 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79218] Re: RFE: Write manpages for bughelper suite
References: <20070114121534.5371.23727.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070122213530.5252.1941.malone@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Alex: you need to "bzr push --create-prefix
sftp://bazaar.launchpad.net/~alex.muntanda/bughelper/bughelper.dev"
If your name on your computer isn't alex.muntanda then you may need to
do "bzr push --create-prefix
sftp://alex.muntanda at bazaar.launchpad.net/~alex.muntanda/bughelper/bughelper.dev"
Hop on IRC if you need some help.
--
RFE: Write manpages for bughelper suite
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79218
From ubuntu at alexm.org Mon Jan 22 22:21:45 2007
From: ubuntu at alexm.org (Alex Muntada)
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 22:21:45 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79218] Re: RFE: Write manpages for bughelper suite
References: <20070114121534.5371.23727.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070122222145.7143.38517.malone@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Dean, I asked in #bzr because I had created an external branch from the
website; those external branches cannot be updated through sftp (it's a
known bug), so I was suggested to rename the branch and set the product
to "obsolete-junk".
I just did and then published my branch as you said (it didn't work
before), so my changes are now avaible and ready for review.
** Changed in: bughelper (upstream)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
RFE: Write manpages for bughelper suite
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79218
From daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com Tue Jan 23 08:48:33 2007
From: daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com (Daniel Holbach)
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 08:48:33 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79218] Re: RFE: Write manpages for bughelper suite
References: <20070114121534.5371.23727.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070123084833.5252.73653.malone@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Good work, Alex! We just need manpages for bugxml also (maybe not for
bugnumers *shrug*).
We also need this bit.
=== modified file 'debian/control'
--- debian/control 2006-12-31 13:39:59 +0000
+++ debian/control 2007-01-23 08:43:13 +0000
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
Priority: extra
Maintainer: Daniel Holbach <daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com>
Build-Depends: cdbs (>= 0.4.43), debhelper (>= 5), python-central (>= 0.5), python-all-dev (>= 2.4)
+Build-Depends-Indep: docbook2x
Standards-Version: 3.7.2
XS-Python-Version: all
** Changed in: bughelper (upstream)
Status: Fix Committed => Confirmed
--
RFE: Write manpages for bughelper suite
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79218
From carlos.perello at canonical.com Tue Jan 23 09:55:52 2007
From: carlos.perello at canonical.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Carlos_Perell=F3_Mar=EDn?=)
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 10:55:52 +0100
Subject: [bug 51609] Help with bug, don't know how to proceed further
In-Reply-To: <45B3BDCE.306@gmail.com>
References: <124937.5891.qm@web25007.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
<45B3BDCE.306@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <45B5DBA8.40804@canonical.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi
t u escribió:
> Vassilis Pandis wrote:
>> --- Rouben <rouben at rouben.net> wrote:
>>> I'm stuck with a bug (# 51609) and don't know how to proceed. The
>>> bug started out as a translation bug, the catch is, however, that
>>> the reporter is volunteering to correct the error. The problem?
>>> Adept (package in question) is not registered with Rosetta. After
>>> some wiki-ing, I figured that contacting the product registrant is
>>> the best way to ask them to register the package with Rosetta...
>>> so, I tried contacting the product registrant as well as anyone who
>>> is remotely associated with Adept, but to no avail, I have yet to
>>> receive a response. Should I refer this issue upstream back to the
>>> KDE project? What is the proper course of action in a case like
>>> this?
>> I think it would be best if the reporter talked to upstream. Not
>> everybody uses Rosetta. Point the reporter upstream since others will
>> benefit from the changes as well. Of course my opinion is by no means
>> authoritative :-)
>
>
> You can contact the upstream on behalf of the reporter. What I see
> usually is that the triager opens a bug report at upstream, refers to
> the LP url, and tells upstream what the original reporter is
> experiencing. Then you'll have to coordinate between the launchpad bug
> report and the upstream bug report.
>
> This way, you don't force your users to go out of their ways to fix
> something.
>
> It's also good to contact rosetta people (CC'ing), they might offer
> better help than us.
> Thanks.
I already answered in the bug report.
Btw, yeah, in the future, is a good thing to contact us if you have any
problem with translations in Ubuntu.
Cheers.
- --
Carlos Perelló MarÃn
Ubuntu => http://www.ubuntu.com
mailto:carlos.perello at canonical.com
http://carlos.pemas.net
Alicante - Spain
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFFtduoEuPMamD5V9cRAmhqAJ96bYKajsa7CiJvwX9p0rRkssIFiACfWiOY
vZSbUXxhsB9r1+3KsvT4OoM=
=t/JO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
From daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com Tue Jan 23 12:08:27 2007
From: daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com (Daniel Holbach)
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 12:08:27 -0000
Subject: [Bug 80307] Re: Please adjust "failed to load external entity" error
message
References: <20070117201742.20188.75247.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070123120827.7336.42706.malone@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Thanks... committed a modified version to bughelper.main:
------------------------------------------------------------
revno: 39
committer: Daniel Holbach <daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com>
branch nick: bughelper.dev
timestamp: Tue 2007-01-23 13:04:54 +0100
message:
committed modified patch by Luca Falavigna <dktrkranz at linuxdc.it> to fix bug #80307
------------------------------------------------------------
** Changed in: bughelper (upstream)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Luca Falavigna
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
Please adjust "failed to load external entity" error message
https://launchpad.net/bugs/80307
From daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com Tue Jan 23 12:11:54 2007
From: daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com (Daniel Holbach)
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 12:11:54 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79142] Re: RFE: Read and write text files with bug numbers
References: <20070113220536.5477.55657.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070123121154.5252.90879.malone@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Good work on that Andrew. What do you think about splitting out the
'printing' to another 'module'? I'd love to keep the bughelper script as
easy to understand as possible.
Also... what do you think about writing the file directly out to the disk?
So that'd be
bughelper -A --format=wiki -p evolution
rather than:
bughelper -A --format=wiki -p evolution > evolution.wiki
for our users. Any other opinions?
--
RFE: Read and write text files with bug numbers
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79142
From brian at canonical.com Wed Jan 24 09:48:54 2007
From: brian at canonical.com (Brian)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 09:48:54 -0000
Subject: [Bug 81248] RFE: bugnumbers - option to count quantity of bugs
References: <20070124094854.783.32651.malonedeb@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070124094854.783.32651.malonedeb@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Public bug reported:
For statistical information, about the quantity of bugs per package, it
would be helpful to have bugnumbers return a count of the number of bugs
rather than bug numbers. Additionally a subcount by status would be
helpful.
** Affects: bughelper (upstream)
Importance: Wishlist
Status: Unconfirmed
** Changed in: bughelper (upstream)
Importance: Undecided => Wishlist
--
RFE: bugnumbers - option to count quantity of bugs
https://launchpad.net/bugs/81248
From daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com Wed Jan 24 10:40:05 2007
From: daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com (Daniel Holbach)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 10:40:05 -0000
Subject: [Bug 81248] Re: RFE: bugnumbers - option to count quantity of bugs
References: <20070124094854.783.32651.malonedeb@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070124104005.783.9956.malone@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Adding 'display' tag.
** Changed in: bughelper (upstream)
Status: Unconfirmed => Confirmed
** Tags added: display
--
RFE: bugnumbers - option to count quantity of bugs
https://launchpad.net/bugs/81248
From daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com Wed Jan 24 10:40:50 2007
From: daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com (Daniel Holbach)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 10:40:50 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79142] Re: RFE: Read and write text files with bug numbers
References: <20070113220536.5477.55657.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070124104050.31689.46021.launchpad@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
** Tags added: display
--
RFE: Read and write text files with bug numbers
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79142
From daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com Wed Jan 24 10:40:49 2007
From: daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com (Daniel Holbach)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 10:40:49 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79140] Re: RFE: Rank bugs by number of dupes
References: <20070113215955.5371.39011.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070124104049.879.47158.launchpad@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
** Tags added: display
--
RFE: Rank bugs by number of dupes
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79140
From daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com Wed Jan 24 14:01:26 2007
From: daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com (Daniel Holbach)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 14:01:26 -0000
Subject: [Bug 81279] Use bin="not" attribute not just in <op> nodes
References: <20070124140126.879.19924.malonedeb@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070124140126.879.19924.malonedeb@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Public bug reported:
At the moment you can negate only simple text conditions, but not
complete <and> or <or> conditions.
Fixing this would require changes to XMLOperations.py and and to
infoFiles.py - while the changes required are probably just a couple of
one line fixes, I suppose it will take a bit of time to figure out.
** Affects: bughelper (upstream)
Importance: Medium
Status: Confirmed
** Changed in: bughelper (upstream)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
Status: Unconfirmed => Confirmed
Target: None => 0.1
** Tags added: xml
--
Use bin="not" attribute not just in <op> nodes
https://launchpad.net/bugs/81279
From daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com Wed Jan 24 14:09:01 2007
From: daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com (Daniel Holbach)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 14:09:01 -0000
Subject: [Bug 81280] RFE: bughelper could -t(ry) bug clues
References: <20070124140901.31689.52649.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070124140901.31689.52649.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Public bug reported:
Imagine running
bughelper -t totem "libxine.so" "This might be a xine bug, ask the reporter to try with xine-ui too."
which would run a search on totem just using that clue. If it successfully finds something, you could run:
bugxml -a totem "libxine.so" "This might be a xine bug, ask the reporter to try with xine-ui too."
** Affects: bughelper (upstream)
Importance: Wishlist
Status: Confirmed
** Changed in: bughelper (upstream)
Importance: Undecided => Wishlist
Status: Unconfirmed => Confirmed
Target: None => 0.1
** Tags added: commandline
--
RFE: bughelper could -t(ry) bug clues
https://launchpad.net/bugs/81280
From daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com Wed Jan 24 14:12:22 2007
From: daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com (Daniel Holbach)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 14:12:22 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79546] Re: Parsing multiple source packages in a bug
References: <20070116140401.25421.62983.malonedeb@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070124141222.879.21791.malone@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Hum... is this fixed in the most recent bughelper (in bugsquad.main)?
--
Parsing multiple source packages in a bug
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79546
From sfllaw at ubuntu.com Wed Jan 24 14:37:17 2007
From: sfllaw at ubuntu.com (Simon Law)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 14:37:17 -0000
Subject: [Bug 81282] Usability improvements for command-line options
References: <20070124143717.31689.78802.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070124143717.31689.78802.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Public bug reported:
We should do some usability testing on bughelper, bugxml, and bugnumbers
to see if we can get better usability out of the command-line tools. I
looked at them and it's not very obvious what I need to do to do
primitive queries and how to save clue files.
This probably implies we need better help files as well.
** Affects: bughelper (upstream)
Importance: High
Assignee: Simon Law
Status: Confirmed
** Description changed:
- We should try bughelper, bugxml, and bugnumbers to see if we can get
- better usability out of the command-line tools. I looked at them and
- it's not very obvious what I need to do to do primitive queries and how
- to save clue files.
+ We should do some usability testing on bughelper, bugxml, and bugnumbers
+ to see if we can get better usability out of the command-line tools. I
+ looked at them and it's not very obvious what I need to do to do
+ primitive queries and how to save clue files.
This probably implies we need better help files as well.
** Changed in: bughelper (upstream)
Importance: Undecided => High
Assignee: (unassigned) => Simon Law
Status: Unconfirmed => Confirmed
--
Usability improvements for command-line options
https://launchpad.net/bugs/81282
From sfllaw at ubuntu.com Wed Jan 24 14:46:31 2007
From: sfllaw at ubuntu.com (Simon Law)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 14:46:31 -0000
Subject: [Bug 81280] Re: RFE: bughelper could -t(ry) bug clues
References: <20070124140901.31689.52649.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070124144631.31836.99912.malone@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
We definitely want this interface to be just switching out the bughelper
command-line to be the bugxml command-line.
--
RFE: bughelper could -t(ry) bug clues
https://launchpad.net/bugs/81280
From sfllaw at ubuntu.com Wed Jan 24 14:56:31 2007
From: sfllaw at ubuntu.com (Simon Law)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 14:56:31 -0000
Subject: [Bug 81285] RFE: Provide bug listings for advanced searches
References: <20070124145631.879.36288.malonedeb@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070124145631.879.36288.malonedeb@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Public bug reported:
We should provide bug output in a format that's greppable, so that we
can get bug counts for various things using standard Unix tools.
For instance:
$ bughelper --parseable-output vino | grep Unconfirmed | wc -l
** Affects: bughelper (upstream)
Importance: Wishlist
Assignee: Simon Law
Status: Confirmed
** Changed in: bughelper (upstream)
Importance: Undecided => Wishlist
Assignee: (unassigned) => Simon Law
Status: Unconfirmed => Confirmed
Target: None => 0.1
--
RFE: Provide bug listings for advanced searches
https://launchpad.net/bugs/81285
From daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com Wed Jan 24 14:55:36 2007
From: daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com (Daniel Holbach)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 14:55:36 -0000
Subject: [Bug 81282] Re: Usability improvements for command-line options
References: <20070124143717.31689.78802.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070124145536.31836.54825.malone@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Is this covered by bug 79218 and bug 79222 maybe?
** Changed in: bughelper (upstream)
Status: Confirmed => Needs Info
--
Usability improvements for command-line options
https://launchpad.net/bugs/81282
From sfllaw at ubuntu.com Wed Jan 24 14:57:14 2007
From: sfllaw at ubuntu.com (Simon Law)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 14:57:14 -0000
Subject: [Bug 81282] Re: Usability improvements for command-line options
References: <20070124143717.31689.78802.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070124145714.879.28740.launchpad@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
** Changed in: bughelper (upstream)
Status: Needs Info => Confirmed
Target: None => 0.1
--
Usability improvements for command-line options
https://launchpad.net/bugs/81282
From sfllaw at ubuntu.com Wed Jan 24 15:07:03 2007
From: sfllaw at ubuntu.com (Simon Law)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 15:07:03 -0000
Subject: [Bug 81288] RFE: Have bughelper log its searches so others can
extract useful clue files
References: <20070124150703.783.5543.malonedeb@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070124150703.783.5543.malonedeb@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Public bug reported:
Apparently, a lot of people use bughelper, but few of them actually
contribute clue files to us.
One suggestion was to let bughelper log its command-line, the
appropriate clue files, and its output. Then they can be sent to
someone else to extract the useful clues and distribute them.
Design constraints include easy parsing of the logs, not sending the
logs automatically, and making it easy to expire old logs.
** Affects: bughelper (upstream)
Importance: Wishlist
Assignee: Simon Law
Status: Confirmed
** Changed in: bughelper (upstream)
Importance: Undecided => Wishlist
Assignee: (unassigned) => Simon Law
Status: Unconfirmed => Confirmed
Target: None => 0.1
--
RFE: Have bughelper log its searches so others can extract useful clue files
https://launchpad.net/bugs/81288
From sfllaw at ubuntu.com Wed Jan 24 15:08:40 2007
From: sfllaw at ubuntu.com (Simon Law)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 15:08:40 -0000
Subject: [Bug 81282] Re: Usability improvements for command-line options
References: <20070124143717.31689.78802.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070124150840.31689.30464.malone@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Not really. This is the bug asking for people to do usability testing
and changing the command-line options themselves.
For instance, it covers removing the -l option and making bughelper
smarter about URL parsing.
--
Usability improvements for command-line options
https://launchpad.net/bugs/81282
From daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com Wed Jan 24 15:18:43 2007
From: daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com (Daniel Holbach)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 16:18:43 +0100
Subject: [bughelper] -m option
Message-ID: <1169651923.19432.10.camel@lovegood>
Hello everybody,
I just committed a bunch of changes to bughelper, which give it a
--minbug option. Thanks a lot Colin for working on this. He also helped
fixing some quirkiness in the and/or/not conditions code.
./bughelper -m 75000 -p ubiquity
will now only consider ubiquity bugs from bugnumber 75000 on.
If you see Colin running along, thank him for that.
Have a nice day,
Daniel
------------------------------------------------------------
revno: 46
committer: Daniel Holbach <daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com>
branch nick: bughelper.dev
timestamp: Wed 2007-01-24 16:13:27 +0100
message:
small fix to minbug to make it apply to bugnumbers too
------------------------------------------------------------
revno: 45
committer: Daniel Holbach <daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com>
branch nick: bughelper.dev
timestamp: Wed 2007-01-24 15:48:19 +0100
message:
merged patch by Colin Watson <cjwatson at ubuntu.com>
------------------------------------------------------------
revno: 39.1.6
merged: colin.watson at canonical.com-20070124102347-gaogk4e22wslz9z8
committer: Colin Watson <colin.watson at canonical.com>
branch nick: bughelper.dev
timestamp: Wed 2007-01-24 11:23:47 +0100
message:
80253
------------------------------------------------------------
revno: 39.1.5
merged: colin.watson at canonical.com-20070124093447-sx9rxdkq41mjuk6v
committer: Colin Watson <colin.watson at canonical.com>
branch nick: bughelper.dev
timestamp: Wed 2007-01-24 10:34:47 +0100
message:
conditions should never be tuples
------------------------------------------------------------
revno: 39.1.4
merged: colin.watson at canonical.com-20070124093240-48pzw9nz1mekn8zp
committer: Colin Watson <colin.watson at canonical.com>
branch nick: bughelper.dev
timestamp: Wed 2007-01-24 10:32:40 +0100
message:
add --minbug option to search only from a given bug number
------------------------------------------------------------
revno: 39.1.3
merged: colin.watson at canonical.com-20070124093151-hx0e34xswxd0c8xm
committer: Colin Watson <colin.watson at canonical.com>
branch nick: bughelper.dev
timestamp: Wed 2007-01-24 10:31:51 +0100
message:
return a boolean even for or_cond
------------------------------------------------------------
revno: 39.1.2
merged: colin.watson at canonical.com-20070124093055-895la7gmlqij0h80
committer: Colin Watson <colin.watson at canonical.com>
branch nick: bughelper.dev
timestamp: Wed 2007-01-24 10:30:55 +0100
message:
stringification methods
------------------------------------------------------------
revno: 39.1.1
merged: colin.watson at canonical.com-20070124093029-ixsx0520gx0aruim
committer: Colin Watson <colin.watson at canonical.com>
branch nick: bughelper.dev
timestamp: Wed 2007-01-24 10:30:29 +0100
message:
more ubiquity clues; info todo
------------------------------------------------------------
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-bugsquad/attachments/20070124/cb41ca10/attachment.sig>
From sfllaw at ubuntu.com Wed Jan 24 15:17:38 2007
From: sfllaw at ubuntu.com (Simon Law)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 15:17:38 -0000
Subject: [Bug 81289] RFE: Output as a detailed machine-parsable file
References: <20070124151738.783.45685.malonedeb@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070124151738.783.45685.malonedeb@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Public bug reported:
We will want to build tools on top of bughelper, some of which may not
be written in Python. Wouldn't it be nice if bughelper could export the
complete results of its screenscraping as a machine-parsable output
file? I suggest XML, but am not tied to it.
** Affects: bughelper (upstream)
Importance: Wishlist
Status: Confirmed
** Changed in: bughelper (upstream)
Importance: Undecided => Wishlist
Status: Unconfirmed => Confirmed
--
RFE: Output as a detailed machine-parsable file
https://launchpad.net/bugs/81289
From sfllaw at ubuntu.com Wed Jan 24 15:21:50 2007
From: sfllaw at ubuntu.com (Simon Law)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 15:21:50 -0000
Subject: [Bug 81291] RFE: Web interface to bughelper
References: <20070124152150.31836.83624.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070124152150.31836.83624.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Public bug reported:
There have been requests for a GUI to bughelper. Henrik suggested that
we build a web application that wraps bughelper and runs queries on
behalf of a user. Output would be displayed as a web page, which may
depend on implementing bug 81289.
This should start off as a web application that operates locally. But
someone could put it on the Internet.
** Affects: bughelper (upstream)
Importance: Wishlist
Status: Confirmed
--
RFE: Web interface to bughelper
https://launchpad.net/bugs/81291
From sfllaw at ubuntu.com Wed Jan 24 15:19:49 2007
From: sfllaw at ubuntu.com (Simon Law)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 15:19:49 -0000
Subject: [Bug 81290] RFE: Create clues that look for comments from
Bugs/Responses
References: <20070124151949.879.3224.malonedeb@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070124151949.879.3224.malonedeb@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Public bug reported:
Please create clue files that will search for open bugs with
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Responses comments. These would imply that
someone ought to look at them.
** Affects: bughelper (upstream)
Importance: Medium
Assignee: Simon Law
Status: Confirmed
** Changed in: bughelper (upstream)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
Assignee: (unassigned) => Simon Law
Status: Unconfirmed => Confirmed
Target: None => 0.1
--
RFE: Create clues that look for comments from Bugs/Responses
https://launchpad.net/bugs/81290
From sfllaw at ubuntu.com Wed Jan 24 15:28:53 2007
From: sfllaw at ubuntu.com (Simon Law)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 15:28:53 -0000
Subject: [Bug 81291] Re: RFE: Web interface to bughelper
References: <20070124152150.31836.83624.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070124152853.31836.60706.launchpad@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
** Changed in: bughelper (upstream)
Importance: Undecided => Wishlist
Status: Unconfirmed => Confirmed
--
RFE: Web interface to bughelper
https://launchpad.net/bugs/81291
From pandisv at yahoo.co.uk Wed Jan 24 15:29:52 2007
From: pandisv at yahoo.co.uk (Vassilis Pandis)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 15:29:52 -0000
Subject: [Bug 81282] Re: Usability improvements for command-line options
References: <20070124143717.31689.78802.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070124152952.31836.86210.malone@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
How about a specification targeted for 0.2 that will be about a review
of the command line options ? Like finding better names for them, adding
--long-options and ensuring consistency ? (
--
Usability improvements for command-line options
https://launchpad.net/bugs/81282
From daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com Wed Jan 24 15:58:07 2007
From: daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com (Daniel Holbach)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 15:58:07 -0000
Subject: [Bug 81282] Re: Usability improvements for command-line options
References: <20070124143717.31689.78802.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070124155807.783.7455.malone@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/BugHelper/Dev/CommandLineZoo might be a good
start for that.
** Tags added: commandline
--
Usability improvements for command-line options
https://launchpad.net/bugs/81282
From daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com Wed Jan 24 16:00:54 2007
From: daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com (Daniel Holbach)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 16:00:54 -0000
Subject: [Bug 81291] Re: RFE: Web interface to bughelper
References: <20070124152150.31836.83624.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070124160054.31836.88251.launchpad@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
** Tags added: display
--
RFE: Web interface to bughelper
https://launchpad.net/bugs/81291
From daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com Wed Jan 24 15:59:59 2007
From: daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com (Daniel Holbach)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 15:59:59 -0000
Subject: [Bug 81289] Re: RFE: Output as a detailed machine-parsable file
References: <20070124151738.783.45685.malonedeb@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070124155959.783.56178.malone@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
First of all: I agree with you - exporting the API of bughelper is a
must and also we should have configurable output as well. Does bug 79142
cover what you're suggesting?
** Changed in: bughelper (upstream)
Status: Confirmed => Needs Info
** Tags added: commandline display xml
--
RFE: Output as a detailed machine-parsable file
https://launchpad.net/bugs/81289
From ubuntu at ikszi.hu Wed Jan 24 16:06:05 2007
From: ubuntu at ikszi.hu (=?utf-8?q?=C3=81ron_Sisak?=)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 16:06:05 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79140] Re: RFE: Rank bugs by number of dupes
References: <20070113215955.5371.39011.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070124160605.31836.73353.malone@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
What do you think about something like
--duplicates 5- (at least 5 duplicates)
--duplicates -100 (at most 100 duplicates)
--duplicates 3-6 (at least 3 and at most 6 duplicates)
Of course a short option would also be great for this.
--
RFE: Rank bugs by number of dupes
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79140
From wendell_listas at bani.com.br Wed Jan 24 16:22:02 2007
From: wendell_listas at bani.com.br (Jonh Wendell)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 13:22:02 -0300
Subject: bughelper and mail list
Message-ID: <1169655722.16772.5.camel@wendell-laptop>
Can bughelper use another list for its discussion and bugs?
Every day i got i lot of emails in my inbox, with a subject which is not
of my interest - development of bughelper.
I know it is a very important tool for us, bugsquad team, but its
development is useful only for a few people.
Thanks,
--
Jonh Wendell
jonh.wendell at gmail.com (MSN / Google Talk)
Linux User #114432
https://launchpad.net/~wendell
From dktrkranz at linuxdc.it Wed Jan 24 22:28:23 2007
From: dktrkranz at linuxdc.it (Luca Falavigna)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 22:28:23 -0000
Subject: [Bug 81370] Re: bughelper should show status and importance
References: <20070124222610.31689.36960.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070124222823.31836.44291.malone@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Attached patch should implement this. Please, double-check my regex.
Thanks.
** Attachment added: "status_importance.patch"
http://librarian.launchpad.net/5851328/status_importance.patch
--
bughelper should show status and importance
https://launchpad.net/bugs/81370
From dktrkranz at linuxdc.it Wed Jan 24 22:26:10 2007
From: dktrkranz at linuxdc.it (Luca Falavigna)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 22:26:10 -0000
Subject: [Bug 81370] bughelper should show status and importance
References: <20070124222610.31689.36960.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070124222610.31689.36960.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Public bug reported:
When searching, bughelper should show status and importance field for
each bug found in order to help triaging.
** Affects: bughelper (upstream)
Importance: Undecided
Status: Unconfirmed
--
bughelper should show status and importance
https://launchpad.net/bugs/81370
From ubuntu at alexm.org Thu Jan 25 00:21:19 2007
From: ubuntu at alexm.org (Alex Muntada)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 00:21:19 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79157] Re: RFE: support local clue files
References: <20070113225823.25421.58908.malonedeb@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070125002120.21584.26378.malone@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Seems The Right Thing to do, but I guess you meant
~/.bughelper/packages/totem.info (starting with a dot).
--
RFE: support local clue files
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79157
From ubuntu at alexm.org Thu Jan 25 00:38:17 2007
From: ubuntu at alexm.org (Alex Muntada)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 00:38:17 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79218] Re: RFE: Write manpages for bughelper suite
References: <20070114121534.5371.23727.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070125003818.783.41725.malone@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Added Daniel's patch plus new bugxml(1) manpage, and made minor fixes to
bughelper(1) manpage. Please, review and commit in bughelper.main.
More opinions about bugnumbers(1) page?
Should we mention it on the same bughelper(1) page?
** Changed in: bughelper (upstream)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed
--
RFE: Write manpages for bughelper suite
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79218
From ubuntu at alexm.org Thu Jan 25 00:49:19 2007
From: ubuntu at alexm.org (Alex Muntada)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 00:49:19 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79546] Re: Parsing multiple source packages in a bug
References: <20070116140401.25421.62983.malonedeb@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070125004919.21722.55699.malone@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
I'm afraid it isn't merged in bughelper.main yet.
I'd be happy to do it, but I still have to figure out how to do it (I'm
a novice bzr user, sorry). I have my own branch and yours locally, but I
don't know how to proceed and don't want to break anything. I guess I
need a deeper look into bzr docs available or wiki.ubuntu.com.
--
Parsing multiple source packages in a bug
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79546
From ubuntu at alexm.org Thu Jan 25 00:54:23 2007
From: ubuntu at alexm.org (Alex Muntada)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 00:54:23 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79215] Re: RFE: port command line parsing to something sane
References: <20070114115830.5477.44398.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070125005423.879.5474.malone@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Man pages in ~alex.muntada/bughelper/bughelper.dev are up to date with
Fernando's changes. The README and wiki pages aren't yet, but that's
part of bug 79222.
--
RFE: port command line parsing to something sane
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79215
From fernando at staff.nerdgroup.org Thu Jan 25 02:59:40 2007
From: fernando at staff.nerdgroup.org (Fernando Ribeiro)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 02:59:40 -0000
Subject: [Bug 81282] Re: Usability improvements for command-line options
References: <20070124143717.31689.78802.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070125025940.21584.90150.malone@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
python optparse don't allow -XX options.
to use this format, you need --XX (-- for long format)
optparse.OptionError: invalid long option string '-la': must start with
--, followed by non-dash
--
Usability improvements for command-line options
https://launchpad.net/bugs/81282
From ash211 at gmail.com Thu Jan 25 03:37:43 2007
From: ash211 at gmail.com (Andrew Ash)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 03:37:43 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79142] Re: RFE: Read and write text files with bug numbers
References: <20070113220536.5477.55657.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070125033743.21584.36946.malone@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Both of those sound reasonable. If anyone wants to make that happen,
I'm sure they could do it faster than me. I have little experience with
Python :)
--
RFE: Read and write text files with bug numbers
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79142
From towsonu2003 at gmail.com Thu Jan 25 04:14:34 2007
From: towsonu2003 at gmail.com (t u)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 23:14:34 -0500
Subject: bughelper emails
Message-ID: <45B82EAA.6020101@gmail.com>
Hi,
There was one suggestion for this that I know of, but I can't respond to
it bc I erased thatmessage.
I have no problem with us being subscribed to important Ubuntu bugs (or
important bughelper bugs) but I think a new group should be formed by
those interested in this important tool and the bughelper bug-emails
should go to that group.
I started loosing the bugs I subscribed to because of the overflow of
bughelper bugs about which I can do nothing bc I don't know how to
program (like others in this list I believe). I don't even know how to
use it...
If you form a new group, we won't loose subscribers (people will
unsubscribe if the email traffic keeps going this high).
Thanks.
From daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com Thu Jan 25 09:14:37 2007
From: daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com (Daniel Holbach)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 09:14:37 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79157] Re: RFE: support local clue files
References: <20070113225823.25421.58908.malonedeb@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070125091437.783.51125.malone@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
No, I don't think dot directories are discoverable enough. Any other
opinions?
--
RFE: support local clue files
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79157
From seb128 at ubuntu.com Thu Jan 25 09:48:04 2007
From: seb128 at ubuntu.com (Sebastien Bacher)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 09:48:04 -0000
Subject: [Bug 81434] "look to closed bug" option would be nice
References: <20070125094804.21584.16555.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070125094804.21584.16555.malonedeb@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
Public bug reported:
That would be useful to find duplicates for bugs already fixed
** Affects: bughelper (upstream)
Importance: Undecided
Status: Unconfirmed
--
"look to closed bug" option would be nice
https://launchpad.net/bugs/81434
From ubuntu at alexm.org Thu Jan 25 13:24:22 2007
From: ubuntu at alexm.org (Alex Muntada)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 13:24:22 -0000
Subject: [Bug 79157] Re: RFE: support local clue files
References: <20070113225823.25421.58908.malonedeb@gandwana.ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070125132422.21584.69292.malone@gangotri.ubuntu.com>
I don't want to argue about that, just think that dot directories are
(and have been) usually more common, so my guess was on that way.
Nevertheless, I have no strong feelings in favor of dot directories
either... ;)
--
RFE: support local clue files
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79157
From jjesse at iserv.net Thu Jan 25 13:46:40 2007
From: jjesse at iserv.net (Jonathan Jesse)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 08:46:40 -0500 (EST)
Subject: bughelper emails
In-Reply-To: <45B82EAA.6020101@gmail.com>
References: <45B82EAA.6020101@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <19620.198.105.65.197.1169732800.squirrel@webmail.iserv.net>
A big +1 from me as well.. I think some of the emails that I ahve sent
asking for help on triaging bugs have gotten lost in the bughelper
discusion as well. A bugherlper-dev group would be great for those that
want to develop this further
> Hi,
>
> There was one suggestion for this that I know of, but I can't respond to
> it bc I erased thatmessage.
>
> I have no problem with us being subscribed to important Ubuntu bugs (or
> important bughelper bugs) but I think a new group should be formed by
> those interested in this important tool and the bughelper bug-emails
> should go to that group.
>
> I started loosing the bugs I subscribed to because of the overflow of
> bughelper bugs about which I can do nothing bc I don't know how to
> program (like others in this list I believe). I don't even know how to
> use it...
>
> If you form a new group, we won't loose subscribers (people will
> unsubscribe if the email traffic keeps going this high).
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
> Ubuntu-bugsquad mailing list
> Ubuntu-bugsquad at lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugsquad
>
>
--
Jonathan Jesse
From sfllaw at ubuntu.com Thu Jan 25 17:22:49 2007
From: sfllaw at ubuntu.com (Simon Law)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 12:22:49 -0500
Subject: UbuntuHugDay: 31 January 2007
Message-ID: <20070125172248.GU11878@law.yi.org>
Hellos!!!
I'm sitting in Oslo with the rest of the Distro team, where we're
hacking on the Sprint. We've been working hard on Feisty and next
Wednesday is a good time to hoover up some stray bugs.
So on 31 January 2007, in all timezones, we'll be meeting in
#ubuntu-bugs on irc.freenode.net for another Ubuntu Bug Day.
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBugDay
We'll be helping bugs without a home find the packages they belong to:
http://tinyurl.com/23wap8
We'll be accepting people into Ubuntu QA:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuQA
And we'll be doing our usual bug triage:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/HelpingWithBugs
If you're interested in helping, please stop by. And feel free to ask
bdmurray, dholbach, and the rest of the team for ways to help out.
Hope to see you there!
Cheers,
--
Simon Law http://www.law.yi.org/~sfllaw/
From gnomefreak at gmail.com Thu Jan 25 20:10:53 2007
From: gnomefreak at gmail.com (John Vivirito)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 15:10:53 -0500
Subject: Mozilla related bugs.
Message-ID: <45B90ECD.3050701@gmail.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
When triaging mozilla bugs can you please refer to the pages listed
below. There are alot of bugs related to Mozilla and we (the
mozillateam) are working on getting them cleaned up and assigned to the
right packages. Not all firefox bugs are caused by firefox. If you are
not sure how to tell the difference btween a firefox bug and java or
flash or any other extension causing the problem please read the links
provided.
We made the mozilla team for this reason and we are working hard to
triage the bugs. I have had a few complaints that bugs are not being
assigned to the right packages and are not being triaged correctly and
causing double ---> triple the work for the team. This is why the pages
below are important to triaging mozilla bugs.
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Bugs/Triage/
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Bugs/Triage/Responses
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingFirefoxDevels
If you have been triaging mozilla bugs for awhile and would like to be
part of the team please apply at:
https://launchpad.net/~mozillateam
- --
GnomeFreak
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/JohnVivirito
https://launchpad.net/people/gnomefreak
http://freewebs.com/ubuntufreak
Linux User# 414246
Ubuntu User# 8175
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFFuQ7Mqig4QTwcPCoRAnMIAJ9Qo0f98NaP6UY8Vs1yWtAYimu8HwCdHSyN
Is6PsYz18e6tihUvZOWngX8=
=utVM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
From dfarning at gmail.com Thu Jan 25 22:42:15 2007
From: dfarning at gmail.com (David Farning)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 16:42:15 -0600
Subject: looking for a jvm triager
Message-ID: <1169764935.5043.59.camel@dfarning-laptop>
I hope that this is not considers poaching;)
A fair amount of the issues reported against firefox are actually jvm
related. I was wondering if there is anyone on the bug squad who is
interested in focusing on jvm related issues.
The issues can be pretty complicated so it would be a great place for a
triager to refine his skills;)
Thanks
David
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-bugsquad/attachments/20070125/cb2184d2/attachment.sig>
From daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com Fri Jan 26 11:09:04 2007
From: daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com (Daniel Holbach)
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 12:09:04 +0100
Subject: [bughelper] bughelper@lists.ubuntu.com mailing list
Message-ID: <1169809744.19168.6.camel@lovegood>
Hello everybody,
Henrik and I moved over bugs and discussions to a new mailing list,
called bughelper at lists.ubuntu.com
I didn't move over subscribers, so please head to
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/bughelper and subscribe
yourself.
The Bughelper team will provide weekly updates to this list, so you'll
stay tuned on new features being introduced.
Thanks a lot, have a nice day,
Daniel
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-bugsquad/attachments/20070126/4692f533/attachment.sig>
From andrew.conkling at gmail.com Fri Jan 26 15:04:55 2007
From: andrew.conkling at gmail.com (Andrew Conkling)
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 10:04:55 -0500
Subject: [bughelper] bughelper@lists.ubuntu.com mailing list
In-Reply-To: <1169809744.19168.6.camel@lovegood>
References: <1169809744.19168.6.camel@lovegood>
Message-ID: <616971f10701260704v5ebb9b20xb84811eaf1c08407@mail.gmail.com>
On 1/26/07, Daniel Holbach <daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com> wrote:
> Henrik and I moved over bugs and discussions to a new mailing list,
> called bughelper at lists.ubuntu.com
>
> I didn't move over subscribers, so please head to
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/bughelper and subscribe
> yourself.
>
> The Bughelper team will provide weekly updates to this list, so you'll
> stay tuned on new features being introduced.
Hi Daniel,
What's the premise? To keep the day-to-day volume on this list down?
Or is the intention to migrate to that list?
If the former, OK; if the latter, I'm heading over. :)
Thanks,
Andrew
From avoinemt at gmail.com Fri Jan 26 15:32:05 2007
From: avoinemt at gmail.com (Mathieu Avoine)
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 10:32:05 -0500
Subject: [bughelper] bughelper@lists.ubuntu.com mailing list
In-Reply-To: <616971f10701260704v5ebb9b20xb84811eaf1c08407@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1169809744.19168.6.camel@lovegood>
<616971f10701260704v5ebb9b20xb84811eaf1c08407@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <f14a149e0701260732v73ee22d6w1bc744b101155acd@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Daniel,
Whatever the reason that initialy motivated the idea of moving discussions
on bughelper to another mailing list, I think it's a great idea because the
amount of emails regarding development of this tool went out of proportions
and it is slightly off topic for the bugsquad mailing list. However, it
would be great to have an update once in a while (perhaps once a week or so)
on the new features and the overall status of the project as it appears to
be a tool that helps many people on the bugsquad.
Thanks again for the new mailing list!
Math
On 1/26/07, Andrew Conkling <andrew.conkling at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 1/26/07, Daniel Holbach <daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com> wrote:
> > Henrik and I moved over bugs and discussions to a new mailing list,
> > called bughelper at lists.ubuntu.com
> >
> > I didn't move over subscribers, so please head to
> > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/bughelper and subscribe
> > yourself.
> >
> > The Bughelper team will provide weekly updates to this list, so you'll
> > stay tuned on new features being introduced.
>
> Hi Daniel,
> What's the premise? To keep the day-to-day volume on this list down?
> Or is the intention to migrate to that list?
>
> If the former, OK; if the latter, I'm heading over. :)
>
> Thanks,
> Andrew
>
> --
> Ubuntu-bugsquad mailing list
> Ubuntu-bugsquad at lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugsquad
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-bugsquad/attachments/20070126/e0e40c5f/attachment.html>
From daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com Fri Jan 26 17:22:34 2007
From: daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com (Daniel Holbach)
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 18:22:34 +0100
Subject: [bughelper] bughelper@lists.ubuntu.com mailing list
In-Reply-To: <616971f10701260704v5ebb9b20xb84811eaf1c08407@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1169809744.19168.6.camel@lovegood>
<616971f10701260704v5ebb9b20xb84811eaf1c08407@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1169832154.3698.2.camel@lovegood>
Hello Andrew,
On Fr, 2007-01-26 at 10:04 -0500, Andrew Conkling wrote:
> What's the premise? To keep the day-to-day volume on this list down?
> Or is the intention to migrate to that list?
Both. The volume was too high for some of the team and all bughelper
related discussions will on that list for now.
Have a nice day,
Daniel
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-bugsquad/attachments/20070126/0226abee/attachment.sig>
From daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com Fri Jan 26 17:25:06 2007
From: daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com (Daniel Holbach)
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 18:25:06 +0100
Subject: [bughelper] bughelper@lists.ubuntu.com mailing list
In-Reply-To: <f14a149e0701260732v73ee22d6w1bc744b101155acd@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1169809744.19168.6.camel@lovegood>
<616971f10701260704v5ebb9b20xb84811eaf1c08407@mail.gmail.com>
<f14a149e0701260732v73ee22d6w1bc744b101155acd@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1169832306.3698.6.camel@lovegood>
Hello Mathieu,
On Fr, 2007-01-26 at 10:32 -0500, Mathieu Avoine wrote:
> However, it would be great to have an update once in a while (perhaps
> once a week or so) on the new features and the overall status of the
> project as it appears to be a tool that helps many people on the
> bugsquad.
That's what I promised on
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-bugsquad/2007-January/000440.html
Have a nice day,
Daniel
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-bugsquad/attachments/20070126/5ea15cb6/attachment.sig>
From towsonu2003 at gmail.com Fri Jan 26 19:44:55 2007
From: towsonu2003 at gmail.com (t u)
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 14:44:55 -0500
Subject: [bughelper] bughelper@lists.ubuntu.com mailing list
In-Reply-To: <1169809744.19168.6.camel@lovegood>
References: <1169809744.19168.6.camel@lovegood>
Message-ID: <45BA5A37.4000103@gmail.com>
Daniel Holbach wrote:
[snip]
> bughelper at lists.ubuntu.com
>
[snip]
> The Bughelper team will provide weekly updates to this list, so you'll
> stay tuned on new features being introduced.
[snip]
Excellent, thank you so much (the idea of providing weekly updates is
great) :)
From andrew.conkling at gmail.com Sat Jan 27 22:32:39 2007
From: andrew.conkling at gmail.com (Andrew Conkling)
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 17:32:39 -0500
Subject: [bughelper] bughelper@lists.ubuntu.com mailing list
In-Reply-To: <1169832154.3698.2.camel@lovegood>
References: <1169809744.19168.6.camel@lovegood>
<616971f10701260704v5ebb9b20xb84811eaf1c08407@mail.gmail.com>
<1169832154.3698.2.camel@lovegood>
Message-ID: <616971f10701271432w36e910cdt91f677e32f02a83a@mail.gmail.com>
On 1/26/07, Daniel Holbach <daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com> wrote:
> Hello Andrew,
>
> On Fr, 2007-01-26 at 10:04 -0500, Andrew Conkling wrote:
> > What's the premise? To keep the day-to-day volume on this list down?
> > Or is the intention to migrate to that list?
>
> Both. The volume was too high for some of the team and all bughelper
> related discussions will on that list for now.
Thanks for your reply. When I read your message, I read "bughelper" as
"bugsquad", which is what confused me. It's all clear now, and I
appreciate you moving the list. :)
I'm having a nice day; you too!
Andrew Conkling
From rouben at rouben.net Sun Jan 28 08:00:17 2007
From: rouben at rouben.net (Rouben)
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 03:00:17 -0500
Subject: Request for comments/suggestions/edits - canned bug responses
Message-ID: <daf11bd20701280000x27e62355se1d71e9830b1bdc1@mail.gmail.com>
Greetings!
I just added a canned response to the
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Responses page (very handy reference, by
the way) with regards to kernel bugs. Basically a summary of
information requested on the kernel debugging wiki page:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingKernelProblems and a request to set
the bug to "Needs Info" rather than "Rejected".
It seemed to me like this was a special enough case under the "not
described well" category to warrant a separate entry. Since kernel
bugs are obviously very important, I wanted to solicit your
comments/suggestions; and please feel free to edit/revert my addition
as you see fit.
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Responses
Thanks everyone!
Rouben
From ubuntu at alexm.org Mon Jan 29 23:04:22 2007
From: ubuntu at alexm.org (Alex Muntada)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 00:04:22 +0100
Subject: Herd 3 freeze imminent
In-Reply-To: <87odoic52f.fsf@thosu.err.no>
References: <87odoic52f.fsf@thosu.err.no>
Message-ID: <20070129230422.GB26586@ac.upc.edu>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
* Tollef Fog Heen <tfheen at ubuntu.com>:
[2007-01-29 14:53:28 +0100]
> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+milestone/herd-3 has a list of
> bugs which are targetted to be fixed for Herd 3. Please look
> to see if there are any bugs there which could use your help,
> and feel free to target showstopper bugs for the milestone.
I'd like to target this showstopper bug, but I don't know how
to do it (or I don't have enough rights):
cdromupgrade script on feisty CD has edgy CODENAME
https://launchpad.net/bugs/77620
This bug makes cdromupgrade script of no use in herd-2.
- --
Alex Muntada <alexm at alexm.org>
http://alexm.org/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iD8DBQFFvn1wLdxCGS3zaBERAvv7AJ47Jsg9fSufHlq+Oh0wDE1vmgbjkQCbBgh+
kPwRtyy845QJmMVcrRYn9xE=
=s5Hh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
From henrik at ubuntu.com Tue Jan 30 12:14:20 2007
From: henrik at ubuntu.com (Henrik Nilsen Omma)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 13:14:20 +0100
Subject: Bug filing video?
Message-ID: <45BF369C.1010004@ubuntu.com>
Hi,
I came across an interesting thought in the ISO testing forum --
step-by-step instructions on filing a good bug, perhaps even a video.
(CCing Alan Pope, our video Guru)
Quote: ... However I am still kinda afraid submitting a new bug. It's
not that I will say something stupid or submit a duplicate bug (almost
inevitable, since searching if a bug exists already or is a duplicate
seems to be more an art than a science if you are new to linux), but
mainly that I am not sure that the bug is worth posting and that it can
be confirmed by others. Perhaps a "worked example" of a real bug being
reported could help. E.g. a real story written by an experienced tester
who finds a bug and reports it in the proper way, following the howto
step by step, would be invaluable (a video of the process would be awesome).
From: http://www.ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=348948
Henrik
From dfarning at gmail.com Tue Jan 30 17:04:47 2007
From: dfarning at gmail.com (David Farning)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 11:04:47 -0600
Subject: Bug filing video?
In-Reply-To: <45BF369C.1010004@ubuntu.com>
References: <45BF369C.1010004@ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <1170176687.29134.6.camel@dfarning-laptop>
On Tue, 2007-01-30 at 13:14 +0100, Henrik Nilsen Omma wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I came across an interesting thought in the ISO testing forum --
> step-by-step instructions on filing a good bug, perhaps even a video.
> (CCing Alan Pope, our video Guru)
>
Henrik,
The doc team is working on some videocasts over at
ubuntu-doc at lists.ubuntu.com I would think that they would be a helpful
resource on this. Sorry, I can't remember any of the details.
A link to this videocast at the top of the the launchpad/bugs would seem
appropriate.
Thanks
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-bugsquad/attachments/20070130/e18a3631/attachment.sig>
From alan at popey.com Wed Jan 31 06:47:40 2007
From: alan at popey.com (Alan Pope)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 06:47:40 +0000
Subject: Bug filing video?
In-Reply-To: <45BF369C.1010004@ubuntu.com>
References: <45BF369C.1010004@ubuntu.com>
Message-ID: <20070131064740.GA18318@popey.com>
On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 01:14:20PM +0100, Henrik Nilsen Omma wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I came across an interesting thought in the ISO testing forum --
> step-by-step instructions on filing a good bug, perhaps even a video.
> (CCing Alan Pope, our video Guru)
>
Guru!? Yikes. :)
Hang on, I'll get my loin cloth.
> Quote: ... However I am still kinda afraid submitting a new bug. It's
> not that I will say something stupid or submit a duplicate bug (almost
> inevitable, since searching if a bug exists already or is a duplicate
> seems to be more an art than a science if you are new to linux), but
> mainly that I am not sure that the bug is worth posting and that it can
> be confirmed by others. Perhaps a "worked example" of a real bug being
> reported could help. E.g. a real story written by an experienced tester
> who finds a bug and reports it in the proper way, following the howto
> step by step, would be invaluable (a video of the process would be awesome).
>
An excellent idea. We have a page [0] where you can specify what Screencasts you would like to see made. Once added someone (possibly
you) can add a specification from which a video can be made.
Thanks for the suggestion.
Cheers,
Al.
[0] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ScreencastTeam/Requests