Tags for small bugs

[Kjell Braden]

On Fr, 2007-12-21 at 12:15 +0200, Murat Gunes wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-12-21 at 08:46 +0100, Gauvain Pocentek wrote:
> 
> > As I understand it, 'ubuntulove' could be used when a patch as to be
> > written for ubuntu only (not for upstream). So I don't really see in
> > what way 'ubuntulove' and 'bitesize' could be exchanged. I think that
> > Jérôme who re-add the tag also understands this like I do. We could use
> > a 'xubuntulove' tag for Xubuntu related patches, and get ride of the
> > 'ubuntulove' I guess.
> 
> That may be a good idea. I'm not sure what your understanding of the tag
> is based on, but there's no indication anywhere that "ubuntulove" was
> intended for things to be fixed in Ubuntu only; the description
> in /Bugs/Tags was:
> 
>  "This bug is an 'Ubuntu love' task. Sometimes not hard to figure out,
> sometimes a small project that could fix the bug. If you want to get
> involved, you might want to start here."
> 
> The question is: do the MOTU and Bug Squad teams need a tag for things
> to be fixed in Ubuntu only, and if positive, should that be "ubuntulove"
> from now on?
> 
> m.
> 
> 

  As I understand it, bugs that *do* need fixing elsewhere should be
marked in LP (see [0]), so we wouldn't need a new tag for the opposite.

[0] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/HowToTriage - Marking a Bug as
Requiring Forwarding

Regards,
Kjell
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-bugsquad/attachments/20071221/4a47c8f9/attachment.pgp