Tags for small bugs
Kjell Braden
fnord at pentabarf.de
Fri Dec 21 10:33:58 UTC 2007
On Fr, 2007-12-21 at 12:15 +0200, Murat Gunes wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-12-21 at 08:46 +0100, Gauvain Pocentek wrote:
>
> > As I understand it, 'ubuntulove' could be used when a patch as to be
> > written for ubuntu only (not for upstream). So I don't really see in
> > what way 'ubuntulove' and 'bitesize' could be exchanged. I think that
> > Jérôme who re-add the tag also understands this like I do. We could use
> > a 'xubuntulove' tag for Xubuntu related patches, and get ride of the
> > 'ubuntulove' I guess.
>
> That may be a good idea. I'm not sure what your understanding of the tag
> is based on, but there's no indication anywhere that "ubuntulove" was
> intended for things to be fixed in Ubuntu only; the description
> in /Bugs/Tags was:
>
> "This bug is an 'Ubuntu love' task. Sometimes not hard to figure out,
> sometimes a small project that could fix the bug. If you want to get
> involved, you might want to start here."
>
> The question is: do the MOTU and Bug Squad teams need a tag for things
> to be fixed in Ubuntu only, and if positive, should that be "ubuntulove"
> from now on?
>
> m.
>
>
As I understand it, bugs that *do* need fixing elsewhere should be
marked in LP (see [0]), so we wouldn't need a new tag for the opposite.
[0] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/HowToTriage - Marking a Bug as
Requiring Forwarding
Regards,
Kjell
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-bugsquad/attachments/20071221/4a47c8f9/attachment.sig>
More information about the Ubuntu-bugsquad
mailing list