From daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com Tue Apr 3 12:41:27 2007 From: daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com (Daniel Holbach) Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2007 14:41:27 +0200 Subject: BugHelper Cron Job Message-ID: <1175604087.22828.7.camel@bert> Hello everybody, I just upgraded my server to Feisty, installed bughelper and now run a small script [1] every hour. http://daniel.holba.ch/bugs/ will now contain fresh reports of bug information and bugs that you can easily start working on You can easily help out by writing and adding clue files, they will automatically get picked up. Documentation on how to do that is here [2]. I committed the script to ~bugsquad/bughelper/bughelper.main (./contrib). [1] http://daniel.holba.ch/bugs/bughelper-cron.py [2] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/BugHelper Have a nice day, Daniel -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil URL: From dries at urga.be Wed Apr 4 00:33:56 2007 From: dries at urga.be (Dries Desmet) Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2007 02:33:56 +0200 Subject: [easy task] straw browser_cmd key In-Reply-To: <1174648683.7769.17.camel@seb128-desktop> References: <1174648683.7769.17.camel@seb128-desktop> Message-ID: <4612F274.7080902@urga.be> Hi Sebastien, Eager to understand, I've got some questions. Sebastien Bacher wrote: > Hi again, > > An easy fix if somebody from the MOTU team wants to do a straw update: > https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/straw/+bug/38980 > > "In gconf, the default for /apps/straw/general/browser_cmd is "" this > makes straw fail to launch my browser. The default should just be an > empty string, this would make straw launch the default browser by > default" > > That has been fixed to the SVN: > http://svn.gnome.org/viewcvs/straw/trunk/data/straw.schemas?r1=190&r2=248 > So the fix was committed in the straw projects's svn. Does the fact that the bug was reported in ubuntu and the availability of a patch speak for a new ubuntu package built? In presuming yes: Is it better to download the latest svn revision and package that up or should the ubuntu package be patched with the upstream patch? Say we don't wait for a new upstream release and just download the current svn state, what should the package be named like? Why does the latest published feisty package have this weird name: 0.26.dsfg.1-2.1ubuntu1? (what does dsfg stand for?) On the launchpad source package page [1], the tab on the left "Builds of straw..." I can only see an i368 build. Is it not available for the other architectures? [1] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/straw/0.26.dsfg.1-2.1ubuntu1 Clearly beginner questions, but this real world example could give me the push to actually commit some time. Thanks. Dries Desmet. From pwwnow at gmail.com Wed Apr 4 12:08:00 2007 From: pwwnow at gmail.com (Peter Whittaker) Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2007 08:08:00 -0400 Subject: New Launchpad look and feel Message-ID: <1175688480.5601.31.camel@EdgeKeep-PC001> Perhaps I am a curmudgeony dinosaur, but I find the new look of Launchpad much harder on the eyes. The previous version was, IMHO, cleaner, easier to read, easier to scan, and made it easier to find desired content. I find the new colour scheme distracting, the new fonts make "header" information more prominent than real content (e.g., comments), and that the new page organization means that more useful is "below the line" than was previously the case.... With the old scheme, I could open a report, scan it quickly, and have a pretty good idea whether I needed to page down - now I have little choice, I almost always have to page down to get to the goods. Having attachments off the to right was IMHO a good thing, contents could be read linearly; with them in-line, they have to be skipped, and this detracts from one's attention (or at least mine). I also have to take more action to get what I want from a page, since a lot of the "always expanded" information in the previous scheme, e.g., subscribers, etc., defaults to collapsed, meaning extra bug clicks. In my mind, these aren't really small points: We have so many bugs and so much triage work to do that anything that slows us down will have unfortunate effects. I'm torn about the new home page capabilities: I love the "bugs I'm involved in" and other stats, but when I visit a home page the first thing I see is a GREAT BIG MUGSHOT, and useful information about the person I'm looking at is "below the line", necessitating a scroll. I'm sure there are those who prefer the new way, and if it helps them, wonderful! But I think whoever developed the "new way" owns a much, much bigger monitor than me, and much bigger than many of the rest of us*. Is there a CSS we can use to "get the old way"? pww * My 15" TFT ain't broke, why would I replace it? Being able to continue to use old hardware and not have to upgrade every time Bill or Steve has a bad night's sleep is one of the tremendous advantages of FLOSS, IMHO. Let's not sacrifice that to eye candy. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From adri2000 at ubuntu.com Wed Apr 4 12:37:52 2007 From: adri2000 at ubuntu.com (Adrien Cunin) Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2007 14:37:52 +0200 Subject: [easy task] straw browser_cmd key In-Reply-To: <4612F274.7080902@urga.be> References: <1174648683.7769.17.camel@seb128-desktop> <4612F274.7080902@urga.be> Message-ID: <1175690273.32433.30.camel@localhost> Hi, CCing ubuntu-motu, I think it's a better place for this kind of questions. Le mercredi 04 avril 2007 à 02:33 +0200, Dries Desmet a écrit : > Hi Sebastien, > > Eager to understand, I've got some questions. > > Sebastien Bacher wrote: > > Hi again, > > > > An easy fix if somebody from the MOTU team wants to do a straw update: > > https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/straw/+bug/38980 > > > > "In gconf, the default for /apps/straw/general/browser_cmd is "" this > > makes straw fail to launch my browser. The default should just be an > > empty string, this would make straw launch the default browser by > > default" > > > > That has been fixed to the SVN: > > http://svn.gnome.org/viewcvs/straw/trunk/data/straw.schemas?r1=190&r2=248 > > > So the fix was committed in the straw projects's svn. Does the fact that > the bug was reported in ubuntu and the availability of a patch speak for > a new ubuntu package built? Yes. > In presuming yes: > Is it better to download the latest svn revision and package that up or > should the ubuntu package be patched with the upstream patch? Better to only apply the patch, so that we don't add new bugs to the package with the svn snapshot. > Say we don't wait for a new upstream release and just download the > current svn state, what should the package be named like? If you package an svn snapshot, version should be something like x.y.z +svnXXXX or x.y.z~svnXXXX (XXXX being the upstream svn revision). If you backport a patch, don't change the upstream version number, just increment the Ubuntu revision: Xubuntu1 -> Xubuntu2, X -> Xubuntu1 (X being the Debian revision). > Why does the latest published feisty package have this weird name: > 0.26.dsfg.1-2.1ubuntu1? (what does dsfg stand for?) dfsg stands for Debian Free Software Guidelines. In a package version, it means that the original upstream tarball contained file(s) considered not free by Debian, which have been removed by the maintainer. 2.1 is the Debian revision (.1 being an NMU (Non-Maintainer Upload)). ubuntu1 means that we have modified this package (first Ubuntu revision of 0.26.dsfg.1-2.1). > On the launchpad source package page [1], the tab on the left "Builds of > straw..." I can only see an i368 build. Is it not available for the > other architectures? straw is written in python, and thus is arch-independent. That's why "Architecture:" in debian/control is "all" and why the package is built on only one architecture. It will work everywhere. > [1] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/straw/0.26.dsfg.1-2.1ubuntu1 > > > Clearly > beginner questions, but this real world example could give me the push > to actually commit some time. > > Thanks. > > Dries Desmet. -- Adrien Cunin aka Adri2000 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée URL: From yelo_3 at yahoo.it Wed Apr 4 13:39:07 2007 From: yelo_3 at yahoo.it (yelo_3) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 13:39:07 +0000 (GMT) Subject: New Launchpad look and feel Message-ID: <412360.6458.qm@web86809.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> you're right. In my opinion the new theme is worse and less professional than the one before... everything is less visible (maybe smaller characters? or the combination background color + text colors) and useful menus are hidden by default (such as the attachments, subscribers) And, in my opinion, the new colors seem designed for a children site :D ----- Messaggio originale ----- Da: Peter Whittaker A: sounder at lists.ubuntu.com Cc: ubuntu-bugsquad at lists.ubuntu.com Inviato: Mercoledì 4 aprile 2007, 14:08:00 Oggetto: New Launchpad look and feel Perhaps I am a curmudgeony dinosaur, but I find the new look of Launchpad much harder on the eyes. The previous version was, IMHO, cleaner, easier to read, easier to scan, and made it easier to find desired content. I find the new colour scheme distracting, the new fonts make "header" information more prominent than real content (e.g., comments), and that the new page organization means that more useful is "below the line" than was previously the case.... With the old scheme, I could open a report, scan it quickly, and have a pretty good idea whether I needed to page down - now I have little choice, I almost always have to page down to get to the goods. Having attachments off the to right was IMHO a good thing, contents could be read linearly; with them in-line, they have to be skipped, and this detracts from one's attention (or at least mine). I also have to take more action to get what I want from a page, since a lot of the "always expanded" information in the previous scheme, e.g., subscribers, etc., defaults to collapsed, meaning extra bug clicks. In my mind, these aren't really small points: We have so many bugs and so much triage work to do that anything that slows us down will have unfortunate effects. I'm torn about the new home page capabilities: I love the "bugs I'm involved in" and other stats, but when I visit a home page the first thing I see is a GREAT BIG MUGSHOT, and useful information about the person I'm looking at is "below the line", necessitating a scroll. I'm sure there are those who prefer the new way, and if it helps them, wonderful! But I think whoever developed the "new way" owns a much, much bigger monitor than me, and much bigger than many of the rest of us*. Is there a CSS we can use to "get the old way"? pww * My 15" TFT ain't broke, why would I replace it? Being able to continue to use old hardware and not have to upgrade every time Bill or Steve has a bad night's sleep is one of the tremendous advantages of FLOSS, IMHO. Let's not sacrifice that to eye candy. -- Ubuntu-bugsquad mailing list Ubuntu-bugsquad at lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugsquad ___________________________________ L'email della prossima generazione? Puoi averla con la nuova Yahoo! Mail: http://it.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html From ttmrichter at gmail.com Wed Apr 4 14:28:46 2007 From: ttmrichter at gmail.com (Michael T. Richter) Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2007 22:28:46 +0800 Subject: New Launchpad look and feel In-Reply-To: <1175688480.5601.31.camel@EdgeKeep-PC001> References: <1175688480.5601.31.camel@EdgeKeep-PC001> Message-ID: <1175696926.5035.9.camel@localhost.localdomain> On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 08:08 -0400, Peter Whittaker wrote: > Is there a CSS we can use to "get the old way"? Alternatively, how about user-editable/configurable CSS? I mean every blogging site that's worth anything provides this and most forum software has limited capabilities in this realm too. -- Michael T. Richter (GoogleTalk: ttmrichter at gmail.com) Never, ever, ever let systems-level engineers do human interaction design unless they have displayed a proven secondary talent in that area. Their opinion of what represents good human-computer interaction tends to be a bit off-track. (Bruce Tognazzini) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From avoinemt at gmail.com Wed Apr 4 16:05:33 2007 From: avoinemt at gmail.com (Mathieu Avoine) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 12:05:33 -0400 Subject: New Launchpad look and feel In-Reply-To: <1175696926.5035.9.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1175688480.5601.31.camel@EdgeKeep-PC001> <1175696926.5035.9.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: Is it just the size of the fonts and such or do you have trouble finding the stuff you used to find easily? Personally, I experienced more of the latter, but also I find that font sizes were chosen badly. For example, if you search for a certain project (ex. f-spot), the label "Not found what you were looking for?" is many times bigger than the search results. At first it pretty much looks like the system doesn't find what I asked for. In terms of usability I've seen better. On the other side, the overall site looks great, with bright colors and most pages are less cluttered than in the previous version. That being said I have 2 questions: 1) Is there a place to post comments? 2) Is there a manual (or a release note of some sort) to let current users know where everything is? Math On 4/4/07, Michael T. Richter wrote: > > On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 08:08 -0400, Peter Whittaker wrote: > > Is there a CSS we can use to "get the old way"? > > > Alternatively, how about user-editable/configurable CSS? I mean every > blogging site that's worth anything provides this and most forum software > has limited capabilities in this realm too. > > -- > *Michael T. Richter* (*GoogleTalk:* > ttmrichter at gmail.com) > *Never, ever, ever let systems-level engineers do human interaction design > unless they have displayed a proven secondary talent in that area. Their > opinion of what represents good human-computer interaction tends to be a bit > off-track. (Bruce Tognazzini)* > > -- > Ubuntu-bugsquad mailing list > Ubuntu-bugsquad at lists.ubuntu.com > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugsquad > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From matid at ubuntu.com Thu Apr 5 04:53:24 2007 From: matid at ubuntu.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Mateusz_Dro=C5=BCd=C5=BCy=C5=84ski?=) Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 06:53:24 +0200 Subject: New Launchpad look and feel In-Reply-To: References: <1175688480.5601.31.camel@EdgeKeep-PC001> <1175696926.5035.9.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: <5e5da4dd0704042153g32f8087fg22b13897cdf4cedf@mail.gmail.com> On 4/4/07, Mathieu Avoine wrote: > On the other side, the overall site looks great, with bright colors and most > pages are less cluttered than in the previous version. I agree that usability has been slightly improved, but the toolbar, with it's lime-green colour, is simply gaudy. I clashes with the rest of the website, easily causing distraction. If it was slightly toned down it'd be significantly better. -- Best regards, Mateusz Drożdżyński From mark at ubuntu.com Thu Apr 5 08:35:06 2007 From: mark at ubuntu.com (Mark Shuttleworth) Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2007 09:35:06 +0100 Subject: New Launchpad look and feel In-Reply-To: <1175688480.5601.31.camel@EdgeKeep-PC001> References: <1175688480.5601.31.camel@EdgeKeep-PC001> Message-ID: <4614B4BA.1000003@ubuntu.com> Peter Whittaker wrote: > Having attachments off the to right was IMHO a good thing, contents > could be read linearly; with them in-line, they have to be skipped, and > this detracts from one's attention (or at least mine). > > I also have to take more action to get what I want from a page, since a > lot of the "always expanded" information in the previous scheme, e.g., > subscribers, etc., defaults to collapsed, meaning extra bug clicks. > The CSS system we have was designed to allow us to have an "advanced" stylesheet, which devotes less real estate to predictable navigation structures and exposes more information immediately. We don't have that stylesheet ready yet, but I've registered a blueprint for it and will ask MPT to pursue it now that 1.0 is out. https://blueprints.launchpad.net/launchpad/+spec/advanced-stylesheet Mark -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From pwwnow at gmail.com Thu Apr 5 10:53:41 2007 From: pwwnow at gmail.com (Peter Whittaker) Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2007 06:53:41 -0400 Subject: New Launchpad look and feel In-Reply-To: <4614B4BA.1000003@ubuntu.com> References: <1175688480.5601.31.camel@EdgeKeep-PC001> <4614B4BA.1000003@ubuntu.com> Message-ID: <1175770421.5355.11.camel@EdgeKeep-PC001> On Thu, 2007-05-04 at 09:35 +0100, Mark Shuttleworth wrote: > The CSS system we have was designed to allow us to have an "advanced" > stylesheet, which devotes less real estate to predictable navigation > structures and exposes more information immediately. We don't have > that stylesheet ready yet, but I've registered a blueprint for it and > will ask MPT to pursue it now that 1.0 is out. > > https://blueprints.launchpad.net/launchpad/+spec/advanced-stylesheet Excellent! Thanks, Mark, I'm looking forward to testing this (and to adding a few ideas to the spec, once I've mulled them over a bit...). This illustrates one of the core values of FLOSS, IMHO: responsiveness and willingness to embrace the needs and interests of others. Though I suppose that's ubuntu, too. Thanks again, pww -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From gm_l at email.it Sun Apr 8 16:15:37 2007 From: gm_l at email.it (Gianmarco Leone) Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2007 18:15:37 +0200 Subject: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/50109 Message-ID: <1176048937.6188.1.camel@ubuntu-laptop.homenet.telecomitalia.it> Hi all, I need help with https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/50109 The bug report is old, but i don't know if it has been resolved. Is it safe to reject the bug and wait for a more recent confirmation to consider it confirmed? thanks gianmarco -- Email.it, the professional e-mail, gratis per te: http://www.email.it/f Sponsor: Fai crescere i tuoi sogni. Scegli il prestito fino a 5.000 euro. * Rate da 20 euro Clicca qui: http://adv.email.it/cgi-bin/foclick.cgi?mid=6331&d=8-4 From pwwnow at gmail.com Mon Apr 16 14:48:18 2007 From: pwwnow at gmail.com (Peter Whittaker) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 10:48:18 -0400 Subject: Bug# 50692: Wishlist or "really important"? Message-ID: <1176734899.7566.15.camel@EdgeKeep-PC001> Bugsquad and laptop-testing folk, I seek your guidance re bug#50692 [1], which is currently marked as wishlist: I tend to agree with comment#4, that this isn't a wishlist item but something that should be fixed (importance likely medium to the owners of any affected laptop). According to [2], wishlist means "new feature", but this report isn't requesting a new feature, it's requesting that an existing laptop capability be supported. It *is* suggesting a particular fix, the fsfn package, so I suppose the request to support this package could be considered wishlisty, but that seems like splitting hairs: hotkeys don't work, this should be fixed, and the suggested package fixes the problem. Your thoughts? Is there another alternative? Thanks, pww [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/50692 [2] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Importance -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From ssweeny at gmail.com Mon Apr 16 15:20:53 2007 From: ssweeny at gmail.com (Scott Sweeny) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 11:20:53 -0400 Subject: Bug# 50692: Wishlist or "really important"? In-Reply-To: <1176734899.7566.15.camel@EdgeKeep-PC001> References: <1176734899.7566.15.camel@EdgeKeep-PC001> Message-ID: On 4/16/07, Peter Whittaker wrote: > Bugsquad and laptop-testing folk, I seek your guidance re bug#50692 [1], > which is currently marked as wishlist: I tend to agree with comment#4, > that this isn't a wishlist item but something that should be fixed > (importance likely medium to the owners of any affected laptop). > > According to [2], wishlist means "new feature", but this report isn't > requesting a new feature, it's requesting that an existing laptop > capability be supported. It *is* suggesting a particular fix, the fsfn > package, so I suppose the request to support this package could be > considered wishlisty, but that seems like splitting hairs: hotkeys don't > work, this should be fixed, and the suggested package fixes the problem. > > Your thoughts? Is there another alternative? > > Thanks, > > pww > > > [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/50692 > > [2] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Importance > I would tend to agree that this bug should be "medium", as IMHO the functioning of the hotkeys falls under "A problem with a non-essential hardware component". I would classify this as a bug with a proposed fix. ~Scott From daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com Tue Apr 17 15:00:32 2007 From: daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com (Daniel Holbach) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 17:00:32 +0200 Subject: Accessibility Desktop bugs Message-ID: <1176822032.8057.5.camel@bert> Hello everybody, Sébastien and I decided that the Desktop Bugs team has enough bugs to cope with already. https://launchpad.net/~desktop-bugs/+packagebugs might give you a good impression of that. Therefore we removed desktop-bugs as a bug contacts of: gok, gnome-orca, gail, atk1.0, at-spi, libgail-gnome, gnome-speech and some other related modules I might have forgotten. I'm sure the Accessibility Devel team will take up the slack and make sure those bugs don't go unanswered and are forwarded upstream if appropriate. If you have questions, it's no problem to subscribe the Desktop Team to the bug and ask for information. Have a nice day, Daniel -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil URL: From daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com Tue Apr 17 15:02:44 2007 From: daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com (Daniel Holbach) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 17:02:44 +0200 Subject: Artwork Bugs Message-ID: <1176822164.8057.8.camel@bert> Hello everybody, Sébastien and I decided that the Desktop Bugs team has enough bugs to cope with already. https://launchpad.net/~desktop-bugs/+packagebugs might give you a good impression of that. Therefore we removed desktop-bugs as a bug contacts of: human-* and feisty-* and some other packages I might have forgotten. The Artwork team has done a very good job in following up on those bugs in the last time, so I don't think this is going to be a problem. If you have any questions that might be desktop related, it's no problem to subscribe the Desktop Team to those bugs and ask for information. Have a nice day, Daniel -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil URL: From daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com Mon Apr 23 08:23:44 2007 From: daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com (Daniel Holbach) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 10:23:44 +0200 Subject: bughelper + python-launchpad-bugs split Message-ID: <1177316624.14408.4.camel@bert> Hello everybody, the bughelper developers just did a split of bughelper and python-launchpad-bugs. We did this for a number of reasons: the API of launchpad-bugs always was: * bughelper centric * undocumented * hard to use * a bit crazy In an attempt to fix the situation, we splitted it out. If you use bughelper installed from the archive, you don't need to worry about that, but if you run bughelper from the bzr version, you need to do the following: bzr checkout sftp://YOUR-LAUNCHPAD-ID at bazaar.launchpad.net/~bugsquad/bughelper/bughelper.main bzr checkout sftp://YOUR-LAUNCHPAD-ID at bazaar.launchpad.net/~bugsquad/python-launchpad-bugs/main python-launchpad-bugs cd bughelper.main ln -s ../python-launchpad-bugs/launchpadBugs Sorry for the inconvenience, but we'll all benefit from the change in the future. Have a nice day, Daniel -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil URL: From robertc at robertcollins.net Mon Apr 23 08:30:15 2007 From: robertc at robertcollins.net (Robert Collins) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 18:30:15 +1000 Subject: bughelper + python-launchpad-bugs split In-Reply-To: <1177316624.14408.4.camel@bert> References: <1177316624.14408.4.camel@bert> Message-ID: <1177317015.7531.68.camel@localhost.localdomain> On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 10:23 +0200, Daniel Holbach wrote: > > ln -s ../python-launchpad-bugs/launchpadBugs > > > Sorry for the inconvenience, but we'll all benefit from the change in > the future. Its more common in python to have all lowercase python package names. So I suggest launchpad_bugs or launchpadbugs as the package name, not 'launchpadBugs'. Cheers, Rob -- GPG key available at: . -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com Mon Apr 30 07:41:54 2007 From: daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com (Daniel Holbach) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 09:41:54 +0200 Subject: Branch location changes Message-ID: <1177918914.23980.14.camel@bert> Hello everybody, we just changed the locations of bughelper and python-launchpad-bugs branches from ~bugsquad to ~bughelper-dev. The bughelper code base has grown over time, it is used in other places as well and the team has fortunately grown as well. If you want to commit to the following branches, please join the team and get your changes reviewed. https://code.launchpad.net/~bughelper-dev We did not change the location of the bughelper-data branch. It's sufficient to be in ~bugsquad for that. So here the full list of relevant branches: * http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~bughelper-dev/bughelper/0.1 (0.1 version in feisty - unsplitted) * http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~bughelper-dev/bughelper/main (0.2 version - splitted already) * http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~bughelper-dev/python-launchpad-bugs/main (0.2 python-launchpad-bugs) * http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~bugsquad/bughelper-data/main (clue file data) Have a nice day, Daniel -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From maini10 at interfree.it Mon Apr 30 17:08:21 2007 From: maini10 at interfree.it (Maini Marco) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 19:08:21 +0200 Subject: Bugs in KDE 3.5.6 packages with Kubuntu 6.10 Message-ID: <46362285.7040200@interfree.it> Hello, I have triaged some bugs regarding Kde 3.5.6 packages in Kubuntu 6.10. This bug seems fixed in Kde 3.5.6 for Feisty. What have to do with this? Thanks for your reply. Bye, Marco