[Ubuntu-BR] [noticia] Fix Ubuntu

Jack Jr cska1911 em gmail.com
Domingo Novembro 10 02:54:28 UTC 2013


A Canonical ganha um trocado nessa história, deveriamos dar uma força e 
deixar habilitado.


Jack Pogorelsky Junior
*Engº Mecânico (CREA-RS 136845)*
Tel: +55 (51) 8124-8132
E-mail: pogorelsky em pogorelsky.net <mailto:pogorelsky em pogorelsky.net>
Site: http://www.pogorelsky.net
Blog: http://www.pogorelsky.net/blog


Em 09-11-2013 22:29, mario / gmail escreveu:
>
>         legal, estamos aqui torcendo pelo melhor, quanto a nos 
> falarmos virtualmente.... hummmm é meio loteria mas possível...vamos 
> ver, prefiro, por enquanto, não prometer...
>
> Em 08-11-2013 19:53, Fábio Lima escreveu:
>> Pelo que me consta, no google, facebook e etc. é até pior. Vamos todos
>> instalar servidores caseiros movidos a distros que não instalam 
>> spyware????
>>
>> Não é cinismo nem postura "é assim mesmo, vamos nos conformar". É 
>> enxergar
>> as coisas no tamanho que elas tem. É perfeitamente possível 
>> desabilitar o
>> recurso, o software é livre e auditável e sempre podemos mudar, caso não
>> desejemos o recurso (que com certeza é útil pra muita gente).
>>
>>
>> 2013/11/8 João Santana <joao.abo.santana em gmail.com>
>>
>>> Ainda acho o mesmo que achava antes, que se faz muita tempestade pra 
>>> uma
>>> coisa fácil de resolver. Ou muda para off o item de configuração ou 
>>> muda-se
>>> de distribuição.
>>>
>>> João Santana
>>> Em 08/11/2013 17:50, "gustavo" <ggusmail em googlemail.com> escreveu:
>>>
>>>> Caros, leiam a discussão abaixo. Afinal o que é que precisaria ser
>>>> "arrumado" no Ubuntu? É que desde a versão 12.10, a Canonical 
>>>> sincroniza
>>> as
>>>> pesquisas do usuário no Dash com os resultados da Amazon.Ads. Para ter
>>>> controle sobre as suas pesquisas no seu próprio sistema, siga as
>>> instruções
>>>> abaixo:
>>>>
>>>> https://fixubuntu.com
>>>>
>>>> Gustavo
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> https://micahflee.com/2013/11/canonical-shouldnt-abuse-trademark-law-to-silence-critics-of-its-privacy-decisions/ 
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2012/10/privacy-ubuntu-1210-amazon-ads-and-data-leaks 
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2013/11/canonical-abused-trademark-law-to-target-a-site-critical-of-ubuntu-privacy/ 
>>>
>>>> Canonical, the maker of Ubuntu, has been fending off criticism from
>>> privacy
>>>> advocates because the desktop search tool in recent versions of the
>>>> operating system also searches the Internet. That means if you're
>>> searching
>>>> your desktop for a file or application, you might also see results 
>>>> from
>>>> Amazon<
>>>>
>>> http://arstechnica.com/business/2012/09/ubuntu-bakes-amazon-search-results-into-os-to-raise-cash/ 
>>>
>>>>> or
>>>> other websites.
>>>>
>>>> One person who dislikes Canonical's search tool is Micah
>>>> Lee<https://twitter.com/micahflee>,
>>>> a technologist at the Electronic Frontier Foundation who maintains the
>>>> HTTPS Everywhere project and is CTO of the Freedom of the Press
>>>> Foundation<https://pressfreedomfoundation.org/about/staff>.
>>>> Lee set up a website called "Fix Ubuntu <https://fixubuntu.com/>," 
>>>> which
>>>> provides instructions for disabling the Internet search tool.
>>>>
>>>> "If you're an Ubuntu user and you're using the default settings, each
>>> time
>>>> you start typing in Dash (to open an application or search for a 
>>>> file on
>>>> your computer), your search terms get sent to a variety of third 
>>>> parties,
>>>> some of which advertise to you," the website says.
>>>>
>>>> According to Lee, Canonical sent him an e-mail this morning asking 
>>>> him to
>>>> stop using the Ubuntu logo and also to stop using the word "Ubuntu" in
>>> his
>>>> domain name. Lee reprinted the entire e-mail in a blog
>>>> post<
>>>>
>>> https://micahflee.com/2013/11/canonical-shouldnt-abuse-trademark-law-to-silence-critics-of-its-privacy-decisions/ 
>>>
>>>>> titled,
>>>> "Canonical shouldn’t abuse trademark law to silence critics of its
>>>> privacy decisions." The message reads:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Subject: Your Use of Ubuntu
>>>> From: ************@canonical.com
>>>>
>>>> Dear Micah,
>>>>
>>>> Canonical Limited (“Canonical”) owns and manages the intellectual
>>> property
>>>> rights in Ubuntu and other associated intellectual property. In 
>>>> addition,
>>>> Canonical is the owner of numerous trademarks and copyright throughout
>>> the
>>>> world relating to Ubuntu, including Ubuntu logo and the word mark of
>>>> Ubuntu.
>>>>
>>>> It has been brought to our attention that your website:
>>>> https://fixubuntu.com/ is using Canonical’s trademarks including 
>>>> Ubuntu
>>>> logo on your website and Ubuntu word in your domain name. The 
>>>> Ubuntu logo
>>>> [1] and a screenshot of your website [2] are set out below.
>>>>
>>>> We are really pleased to know your interest in writing about 
>>>> Ubuntu. But
>>>> whilst we can appreciate the passion Ubuntu inspires, we also have 
>>>> to be
>>>> diligent to ensure that Ubuntu’s trademarks are used correctly.
>>>>
>>>> To keep the balance between the integrity of our trademarks and the
>>> ability
>>>> to use and promote Ubuntu, we’ve tried to define a reasonable
>>> Intellectual
>>>> Property Policy. You can read the full policy at
>>>> http://www.canonical.com/intellectual-property-policy. As you can see
>>> from
>>>> our policy, to use the Ubuntu trademarks and Ubuntu word in a 
>>>> domain name
>>>> would require approval from Canonical.
>>>>
>>>> Unfortunately, in this instance we cannot give you permission to use
>>> Ubuntu
>>>> trademarks on your website and in your domain name as they may lead to
>>>> confusion or the misunderstanding that your website is associated with
>>>> Canonical or Ubuntu.
>>>>
>>>> So, whilst we are very happy for you to write about Ubuntu, we request
>>> you
>>>> to remove Ubuntu word from you domain name and Ubuntu logo from your
>>>> website. We would highly appreciate if you could confirm you have 
>>>> done so
>>>> by replying this email to us.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> To prove its point, the e-mail showed a screenshot of Lee's site 
>>>> with the
>>>> Ubuntu logo:
>>>>
>>>> The policy Canonical pointed to does say that permission from the 
>>>> company
>>>> is required to use "any Trademark in a domain name or URL or for
>>>> merchandising purposes." Lee argued that his use of the Ubuntu logo 
>>>> and
>>> the
>>>> name in his domain is "nominative
>>>> use<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nominative_use>"
>>>> and thus not a trademark violation. "Although I’m perfectly within my
>>>> rights to continue using both, I’ve decided to remove the Ubuntu logo
>>> from
>>>> the website, but add a disclaimer—because it seems like a nice 
>>>> thing to
>>>> do," he wrote. (The EFF, for what it's worth, has published this
>>>> list<https://www.eff.org/wp/tips-shutting-down-g>of tips to help
>>>> makers of parody sites avoid getting shut down.)
>>>>
>>>> That new disclaimer reads as follows:
>>>>
>>>> Disclaimer: In case you are either 1) a complete idiot; or 2) a 
>>>> lawyer;
>>> or
>>>> 3) both, please be aware that this site is not affiliated with or
>>> approved
>>>> by Canonical Limited. This site criticizes Canonical for certain
>>>> privacy-invading features of Ubuntu and teaches users how to fix them.
>>> So,
>>>> obviously, the site is not approved by Canonical. And our use of the
>>>> trademarked term Ubuntu is plainly descriptive—it helps the public 
>>>> find
>>>> this site and understand its message.
>>>>
>>>> His website still has the same domain name that includes the word
>>> "Ubuntu."
>>>> Canonical doesn't seem to have a problem with other websites using the
>>> word
>>>> Ubuntu in their domain names, such as "OMG!
>>>> Ubuntu!<http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/>,"
>>>> a news site that writes enthusiastically about the operating system.
>>>>
>>>> Canonical's registered trademark doesn't specifically mention domain
>>> names,
>>>> but it claims broad rights over the word Ubuntu for use in
>>>> "Telecommunication, communication, and broadcasting services provided
>>>> online, via the Internet, or via other communications networks," and
>>>> "transmission of information, data, text, images, graphics, sound 
>>>> and/or
>>>> audio-visual material online, via the Internet or via other
>>> communications
>>>> networks."
>>>>
>>>> We've contacted Canonical about the e-mail sent to Lee, but haven't 
>>>> heard
>>>> back yet.
>>>>
>>>> While Ubuntu's code is open source and free to everyone, Canonical
>>>> obviously hasn't given up its right to enforce its trademarks. Lee 
>>>> argued
>>>> that the company's stance against his website "isn't very much in the
>>>> spirit of open source," though. The code for Fixubuntu.com is also 
>>>> open
>>>> source—Lee invited Canonical to "submit a patch" if it decides to help
>>> out
>>>> "in a more productive way."
>>>>
>>>> The EFF has already sent a response to Canonical, in a letter from EFF
>>>> Staff Attorney Daniel Nazer. "While we appreciate the polite tone 
>>>> of your
>>>> letter, we must inform you that your request is not supported by
>>> trademark
>>>> law and interferes with protected speech," the letter says. "The 
>>>> website
>>>> criticizes Canonical Limited for certain features of Ubuntu that 
>>>> Mr. Lee
>>>> believes undermine user privacy and teaches users how to fix these
>>>> problems. It is well-settled that the First Amendment fully 
>>>> protects the
>>>> use of trademarked terms and logos in non-commercial websites that
>>>> criticize and comment upon corporations and products. Mr. Lee's 
>>>> site is a
>>>> clear example of such protected speech. Neither Mr. Lee, nor any other
>>>> member of the public, must seek your permission before engaging in 
>>>> such
>>>> constitutionally protected expression."
>>>>
>>>> *UPDATE*: Canonical responded to Ars, providing the following 
>>>> statement:
>>>> "To protect the Ubuntu brand, we need to ensure that wherever you 
>>>> see the
>>>> Ubuntu logo, it’s an authentic part of the Ubuntu community. We have a
>>>> public policy (http://www.canonical.com/intellectual-property-policy),
>>>> which
>>>> is open and accessible, and protects the brand. It states where you 
>>>> can
>>>> freely use the Ubuntu brand and where a licence is needed. 
>>>> Trademark law
>>>> requires us to protect our trademarks, so where needed we will always
>>> start
>>>> a dialogue to ensure the trademarks are used properly to avoid
>>> confusion."
>>>> -- 
>>>> Mais sobre o Ubuntu em português: http://www.ubuntu-br.org/comece
>>>>
>>>> Lista de discussão Ubuntu Brasil
>>>> Histórico, descadastramento e outras opções:
>>>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-br
>>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Mais sobre o Ubuntu em português: http://www.ubuntu-br.org/comece
>>>
>>> Lista de discussão Ubuntu Brasil
>>> Histórico, descadastramento e outras opções:
>>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-br
>>>
>>
>>
>
>





More information about the ubuntu-br mailing list