[Ubuntu-BD] about filezilla installation

[Tarin Mahmood]

this is funny, cause I am sure I'm using 64bit Ubuntu 9.04 and filezilla was
installed using Synaptic :-/

Mahmood



On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 11:44 PM, saeed ahmed <saeed.sas at gmail.com> wrote:

> yes synaptic would not work for filezilla on 64-bit machine
>
> On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 11:40 PM, Ashiqur Rahman Angel <angel at linux.org.bd
> >wrote:
>
> > This is special case, I can ensure this, synaptic won't work here as
> well.
> > Dunno why.
> >
> > On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 11:10 PM, Lenin <lenin at phpxperts.net> wrote:
> >
> > > Either use synaptic package manager or use the
> > > apt-get method at the bash shell.
> > >
> >
> > Is it really? I wonder then why Ubuntu Documentation will use
> unrecommended
> > Add Remove Softwares instead of Synaptic? (
> > https://help.ubuntu.com/community/RestrictedFormats). In my opinion, Add
> > Remove Softwares is better for novice but Synaptic for advanced user,
> it's
> > great for people who want more features, without having to use apt-get
> for
> > everything, but it's terrible for people who want a simple "I want D9"
> and
> > they get it.
> >
> > Add/remove softwares is not the recommended method for installing and
> > > uninstalling softwares.
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Angel
> > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Angel
> > 0DF8 <http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Angel%0A0DF8> 3CD4 AFE3 68C6
> 2CDA
> > 9F17 14B8 1A15 E5F7 73C2
> >
> > Fedora -- Freedom² and rapid innovation
> >
> > Pablo Picasso<
> > http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/p/pablo_picasso.html>
> > - "Computers are useless. They can only give you answers."
> > --
> > Ubuntu Bangladesh | http://ubuntu-bd.org
> > ubuntu-bd at lists.ubuntu.com
> > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bd
> >
> --
> Ubuntu Bangladesh | http://ubuntu-bd.org
> ubuntu-bd at lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bd
>