[Ubuntu-BD] NTFS or FAT32

Thu Oct 9 20:49:20 BST 2008

হুমম. করছি কেননা সদস্য হতে হবে ঐ ডিসকাশনেরও যদি পড়তে চান:
Discussion   Which of the modern file systems do you prefer and why?

I'm currently planing on growing the storage capacity of my hobby system and
at the same time I would like to pilot one of the more modern file systems.

Posted 7 hours ago
 [image: Lari Korpi]<http://www.linkedin.com/profile?viewProfile=&key=20729465&authToken=dKT2&authType=name>
 Lari
Korpi<http://www.linkedin.com/profile?viewProfile=&key=20729465&authToken=dKT2&authType=name>

System Specialist at TietoEnator Processing & Network Oy

 See all Lari's discussions »
<http://www.linkedin.com/groupAnswers?searchQuestionsPostedByOther=&gid=49301&answerCategory=myans&memberID=20729465>

 Comment
<http://www.linkedin.com/groupAnswers?viewQuestionAndAnswers=&discussionID=193735&gid=49301&trk=add-qa-disc-cThOon0JumNFomgJt7dBpSBA#comment-form>
  Your Comment:

   -

 or Cancel<http://www.linkedin.com/groupAnswers?viewQuestionAndAnswers=&discussionID=193735&gid=49301&trk=add-qa-disc-cThOon0JumNFomgJt7dBpSBA#>
   Comments: 7

   1.  Rael Mussell<http://www.linkedin.com/profile?viewProfile=&key=16027096&authToken=gHVb&authType=name>

   Sr. UNIX Admin at Credit Acceptance
     ZFS is *REALLY* nice. With Disk pooling in a sort of JBOD manner and
   active management of data with fault tolerance, I could easily see ZFS, if
   it was released under GNU for integration into Linux, as the future and
   primary FS type. Much like ext2 was the defacto standard for quite a few
   years.

   I also give praise to ext3, which has always proven reliable in terms of
   data recovery, but not necessarily in uptime. I have yet to be exposed to
   ext4 but I've heard nothing but great things about that one as well.

   Posted 6 hours
ago<http://www.linkedin.com/groupAnswers?viewQuestionAndAnswers=&gid=49301&discussionID=193735&commentID=232976#commentID_232976>
    2.  Jean-François
Gobin<http://www.linkedin.com/profile?viewProfile=&key=14088047&authToken=oz6T&authType=name>

   Network Administrator at Stroz Friedberg, LLC
     Hey Lari,

   Which ... errr ... and modern ... double-err ....

   It frankly depends on what I'm doing. I tend to have a slight preference
   for xfs if I have to deal with large files (xfs with a good tuning is a real
   killer! But better be sure of your hardware!), or reiserfs for fs with lots
   of small files scattered in zillions of directories.

   I do enjoy ext3 as a all-purpose fs. But it needs a fair amount of tuning
   before being a real challenger.

   My preferences are, in decreasing order: xfs, reiserfs, ext3.

   That's when it comes to linux. On BSD, I find UFS+ quite cool.

   Jean

   Posted 6 hours
ago<http://www.linkedin.com/groupAnswers?viewQuestionAndAnswers=&gid=49301&discussionID=193735&commentID=233276#commentID_233276>
    3.  Leandro DUTRA, Guimarães Faria
Corcete<http://www.linkedin.com/profile?viewProfile=&key=56997&authToken=LVQQ&authType=name>

   Data, Database and Systems Administrator, Architect, Modeller, Translator
     ReiserFS is a dead end. It always had issues, and its cool factor was
   misplaced — the ultimate vision for it was due to a misunderstanding of data
   concepts by its author, who by the way is now incarcerated and thus won't be
   able to continue his work.

   ext3 is mature and has the tools. ext4 impoves on it, so for a hobby
   system is an interesting proposition.

   Posted 5 hours
ago<http://www.linkedin.com/groupAnswers?viewQuestionAndAnswers=&gid=49301&discussionID=193735&commentID=233454#commentID_233454>
    4.  Nickola
Kolev<http://www.linkedin.com/profile?viewProfile=&key=3805999&authToken=NRW7&authType=name>

   IT Manager/SNE
     I'm mostly a linux guy.
   That's why the number-one, all-purpose fs for me is IBM's jfs. It is rock
   solid (well, not in it's infancy times, before maybe 4-5 yrs ago), and
   performs equally well on large storage areas and on desktop machines. It IS
   fast, which should also be taken into account.
   After that, of course, comes ext3. This is currently the choise for any
   system, which needs to go the 'it just has to work' way.
   And... I've heard quite a lot of good opinions for zfs, but have never
   tested it personally.

   Posted 5 hours
ago<http://www.linkedin.com/groupAnswers?viewQuestionAndAnswers=&gid=49301&discussionID=193735&commentID=233576#commentID_233576>
    5.  Rael Mussell<http://www.linkedin.com/profile?viewProfile=&key=16027096&authToken=gHVb&authType=name>

   Sr. UNIX Admin at Credit Acceptance
     ReiserFS is a dead technology, heck the author is in jail for killing
   his wife, and is very unstable over a certain size and is a bear to
   recovery. I would NEVER and advocate directly against using ReiserFS for any
   production support.

   Posted 5 hours
ago<http://www.linkedin.com/groupAnswers?viewQuestionAndAnswers=&gid=49301&discussionID=193735&commentID=233650#commentID_233650>
    6.  Rael Mussell<http://www.linkedin.com/profile?viewProfile=&key=16027096&authToken=gHVb&authType=name>

   Sr. UNIX Admin at Credit Acceptance

   This comment was deleted by the author

   Posted 5 hours ago
    7.  [image: Asaf Maruf] Asaf
Maruf<http://www.linkedin.com/profile?viewProfile=&key=2669545&authToken=Yfft&authType=name>

   Technical Support Engineer
     Ext3, the file system that is default for Linux based systems has
   proven itself to be quite stable and able to handle different sized
   workloads and file sizes. It is a good all-rounder.

   I would look into ZFS from Sun as it promises to be a very high
   performance, high storage FS. It is open source so we can expect it to
   become better over time.

   Posted 4 hours
ago<http://www.linkedin.com/groupAnswers?viewQuestionAndAnswers=&gid=49301&discussionID=193735&commentID=233836#commentID_233836>

2008/10/10 Shahriar Tariq <tariq086 at gmail.com>

> On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 1:28 AM, 9el <lenin at phpxperts.net> wrote:
>
> > Visit this..  A discussioin over the Linux's best file systems.
> >
> >
> >
> http://www.linkedin.com/groupAnswers?viewQuestionAndAnswers=&discussionID=193735&gid=49301&trk=add-qa-disc-cThOon0JumNFomgJt7dBpSBA
> >
> >
>
> লিঙ্কেডিন একাউন্ট নাই :(
> অন্য কোন উপায় আছে দেখার???
> কপিপেস্ট করা যায় কোন খানে?
> --
> ubuntu-bd mailing list
> ubuntu-bd at lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bd
>