[Ubuntu-BD] Ext3 or jfs

[Angel]

Ofcourse JFS is good. No problem.


Angel
GPG key: 0xC4639705
Bangladesh Linux Users Alliance
Fedora Ambassador Bangladesh
Fedora -- Freedom² and rapid innovation


On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 7:19 PM, dark lord <darklord2007 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Well that warning make me afraid i choose jfs . I hope jfs is not bad
> at . Hasin vi suggested it at first ubuntu party.
>
> On 11/23/08, Angel <fedora at linux.org.bd> wrote:
> > That is a legitimate warning that has been in every Debian and Ubuntu
> > release and appropriately applicable, I think.
> >
> > Due to an interaction between GRUB and XFS, sometimes the grub-install
> > command will hang when the installer attempts to install grub to an XFS
> > partition.
> >
> > Unless you are comfortable with installing grub by hand in case the
> > installer hangs, you should make a separate ext3 /boot partition (roughly
> > 100MB in size) so that GRUB can reliably install.
> >
> >
> > Angel
> > GPG key: 0xC4639705
> > Bangladesh Linux Users Alliance
> > Fedora Ambassador Bangladesh
> > Fedora -- Freedom² and rapid innovation
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 6:34 PM, dark lord <darklord2007 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> I choose xfs but it says The grub boot loader installation often fails
> >> or hangs when / boot is on a XFS file system.
> >>
> >> On 11/23/08, Angel <fedora at linux.org.bd> wrote:
> >> > Well. When I first heard about JFS. I did a little research on it on
> the
> >> > net.
> >> >
> >> > Based on various sites forums and blogs, *XFS appears to be the most
> >> > appropriate filesystem* to install on a file server for home or small
> >> > business needs :
> >> >
> >> >    - It uses the maximum capacity of your server hard disk(s)
> >> >    - It is the quickest FS to create, mount and unmount
> >> >    - It is the quickest FS for operations on large files (>500MB)
> >> >    - This FS gets a good second place for operations on a large number
> >> > of
> >> >    small to moderate-size files and directories
> >> >    - It constitutes a good CPU vs time compromise for large directory
> >> >    listing or file search
> >> >    - It is not the least CPU demanding FS but its use of system
> >> ressources
> >> >    is quite acceptable for older generation hardware
> >> >
> >> > While Linux Gazette Authors, *Justin Piszcz* did not explicitly
> >> > recommand
> >> > XFS, he concludes that "Personally, I still choose XFS for filesystem
> >> > performance and scalability". I can only support this conclusion.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Angel
> >> > GPG key: 0xC4639705
> >> > Bangladesh Linux Users Alliance
> >> > Fedora Ambassador Bangladesh
> >> > Fedora -- Freedom² and rapid innovation
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 3:19 PM, dark lord <darklord2007 at gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Is there any advantage using jfs for linux not ext3?
> >> >>
> >> >> --
> >> >> DARKLORD (:=
> >> >>
> >> >> --
> >> >> ubuntu-bd mailing list
> >> >> ubuntu-bd at lists.ubuntu.com
> >> >> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bd
> >> >>
> >> > --
> >> > ubuntu-bd mailing list
> >> > ubuntu-bd at lists.ubuntu.com
> >> > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bd
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> DARKLORD (:=
> >> --
> >> ubuntu-bd mailing list
> >> ubuntu-bd at lists.ubuntu.com
> >> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bd
> >>
> > --
> > ubuntu-bd mailing list
> > ubuntu-bd at lists.ubuntu.com
> > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bd
> >
>
>
> --
> DARKLORD (:=
> --
> ubuntu-bd mailing list
> ubuntu-bd at lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bd
>