New proposal for Ubuntu Backporters Team Charter

[Mattia Rizzolo]

Hello Robie!

On Wed, Mar 01, 2023 at 05:21:10PM +0000, Robie Basak wrote:
> I wonder if it's worth first discussing what the text would actually be
> used *for*, since your reply suggests to me that we might not have the
> same view on this here.

This seems to be the case indeed.

> I see the (my) proposed text as a point of reference between the
> backporters team and the rest of the project, but generally only for use
> to guide the backporters team in defining their own policies, procedures
> and documentation, cases where it was unclear what their
> responsibilities are, or in case of some kind of unhappiness

I think we are in complete agreement then.
Your description perfectly matches my definition as well.

To me, Charter and Polices are to be the actual rules that describe
how the team has to behave.
Indeed, team members needs to be aware of them, and so do those who
aspire to actually be part of the team.  But people who interact with
us (i.e. those contributing backported packages) really have no
business with these documents.

-- 
regards,
                        Mattia Rizzolo

GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18  4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540      .''`.
More about me:  https://mapreri.org                             : :'  :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri                  `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia  `-
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-backports/attachments/20230301/ca8b637b/attachment.sig>