clarification on specific wording for no-bug-required backport exceptions

[Dan Streetman]

Replying to keep this thread alive.

On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 11:24 AM Dan Streetman <ddstreet at ieee.org> wrote:
>
> Replying to keep this thread alive.
>
> On Sun, Feb 6, 2022 at 7:43 PM Daniel Streetman <ddstreet at ieee.org> wrote:
> >
> > This is to start/continue the discussion from the last meeting, to get clear wording on what backports the team will accept without a corresponding bug.
> >
> > For reference, discussion was started at the last mtg:
> > https://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2022/01/26/%23ubuntu-meeting.html
> >
> > My first thought is no-bug backports should have no code changes at all from the later release (i.e. only the change in package version to add the BPO suffix). Maybe that's too restrictive though?