clarification on specific wording for no-bug-required backport exceptions

Daniel Streetman ddstreet at
Mon Feb 7 00:43:38 UTC 2022

This is to start/continue the discussion from the last meeting, to get
clear wording on what backports the team will accept without a
corresponding bug.

For reference, discussion was started at the last mtg:

My first thought is no-bug backports should have no code changes at all
from the later release (i.e. only the change in package version to add the
BPO suffix). Maybe that's too restrictive though?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <>

More information about the ubuntu-backports mailing list