clarification on specific wording for no-bug-required backport exceptions
Daniel Streetman
ddstreet at ieee.org
Mon Feb 7 00:43:38 UTC 2022
This is to start/continue the discussion from the last meeting, to get
clear wording on what backports the team will accept without a
corresponding bug.
For reference, discussion was started at the last mtg:
https://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2022/01/26/%23ubuntu-meeting.html
My first thought is no-bug backports should have no code changes at all
from the later release (i.e. only the change in package version to add the
BPO suffix). Maybe that's too restrictive though?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-backports/attachments/20220206/96877456/attachment.html>
More information about the ubuntu-backports
mailing list