clarification on specific wording for no-bug-required backport exceptions

Dan Streetman ddstreet at ieee.org
Thu Aug 25 15:24:49 UTC 2022


Replying to keep this thread alive.

On Sun, Feb 6, 2022 at 7:43 PM Daniel Streetman <ddstreet at ieee.org> wrote:
>
> This is to start/continue the discussion from the last meeting, to get clear wording on what backports the team will accept without a corresponding bug.
>
> For reference, discussion was started at the last mtg:
> https://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2022/01/26/%23ubuntu-meeting.html
>
> My first thought is no-bug backports should have no code changes at all from the later release (i.e. only the change in package version to add the BPO suffix). Maybe that's too restrictive though?



More information about the ubuntu-backports mailing list