[Bug 1002780] Re: Please backport gimp 2.8.0-2ubuntu1 (main) from quantal

[Iain Lane]

On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 06:10:37PM -0000, Jason Conti wrote:
> Should we give more detailed comments about what we are testing, or can
> we just start ticking off boxes? (For instance, gimp-dds surprisingly
> works just fine, and also rebuilds fine) And for the rebuild testing,
> are local rebuilds acceptable or should I test build them in my ppa with
> the other backports?

No, if things still work without any further changes then you can just
check the box. Local rebuilds are ok if they are done in a minimal
environment (create chroot, install new gimp, test build). A PPA may be
easier, and is also fine. :-)

> Also, why do most of the Reverse-Build-Depends have two check boxes?

A bug I guess. Feel free to delete duplicates.

-- 
Iain Lane                                  [ iain at orangesquash.org.uk ]
Debian Developer                                   [ laney at debian.org ]
Ubuntu Developer                                   [ laney at ubuntu.com ]
PhD student                                       [ ial at cs.nott.ac.uk ]

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the registrant for Precise Backports.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1002780

Title:
  Please backport gimp 2.8.0-2ubuntu1 (main) from quantal

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/precise-backports/+bug/1002780/+subscriptions