backports archive

The Backports team doesn't have any control over the actual Backports
repository's administration on archive.ubuntu.com....

Though I'd like to know why a blank Backports repo can't be made for Breezy
to ease the migration pain.


At first, it was reported that Dapper might open <72hrs after Breezy's
release, so I didn't think this was a big concern. However, more than a week
has past, and now I'm growing more and more concerned about the issue.


mdz, any word on how long it'll be before we start seeing Breezy-backports
repositories?

On 10/26/05, Matthew East <mdke at ubuntu.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2005-10-26 at 06:27 -0400, John Dong wrote:
> > Mez and I were told that breezy-backports would be created when Dapper
> > opens...
>
> Argh, that is painful. Ok we will make sure that is documented for
> dapper-backports when the time comes. I'm seeing so many complaints
> about this!
>
> Matt
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQBDX1vetSaF0w5rBv8RAl5yAJ47Q3kFv53qjj2tmvPmy7XPjdTkGACffP4N
> FGvmGqHc2A//Lokr3AlKIPo=
> =nt0+
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
> --
> ubuntu-backports mailing list
> ubuntu-backports at lists.ubuntu.com
> http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-backports/attachments/20051026/d3792c8b/attachment.htm