Modified source for Backports (Was: banshee backport (some questions))

Matt,

We've got a problem here. A much desired Banshee backport requires a changed
source package specifically for backports (as the specific change would be
detrimental to Dapper). What choices do we have here?

On 11/13/05, Sebastian Dröge <mail at slomosnail.de> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I wanted to get banshee backported to breezy... but this needs
> libipoddevice and ipod-sharp beeing backported too.
>
> The problem now is, that ipod-sharp needs monodoc 1.1.9 which in turn
> needs xsp 1.1.9 which in turn needs mono 1.1.9.
> ipod-sharp needs monodoc for a documentation package which was disabled
> in breezy but I see no way how to disable it for breezy backports and
> let it enabled for dapper from the same sourcepackage. Is it possible to
> use a modified sourcepackage for a backport or _must_ it be the dapper
> one?
>
> Bye
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQBDd1OaBsBdh1vkHyERAqWmAKCGsHlC+4d3vwk7Sq4HdR6WeknTVQCfc8dZ
> z7hsPdNNrPt/S+ICdYZoZb0=
> =0+SF
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
> --
> ubuntu-backports mailing list
> ubuntu-backports at lists.ubuntu.com
> http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-backports/attachments/20051113/a1ccabe5/attachment.htm