banshee backport (some questions)

On So, 2005-11-13 at 10:22 -0500, John Dong wrote:
> We'd like it all to be Dapper sources. I've talked to tseng briefly
> about Mono backports, and he was OK with the idea, since no big mono
> changes have occurred.
> 
> Maybe we'll get that started soon. 

No, he told you that 'mono' is fine... only the mono package not the
complete mono stack. monodoc for example will be problematic so please
don't do it.

That's exactly why I ask... so we have 2 options here... either using a
modified ipod-sharp sourcepackage for the backports or no banshee
backported at all.
Or I could upload a stripped ipod-sharp to dapper, this one gets
backported and I add monodoc support again. But this seems to be
braindead to me... and I won't like to do it

Bye
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-backports/attachments/20051113/f7a3f026/attachment.pgp