banshee backport (some questions)

We'd like it all to be Dapper sources. I've talked to tseng briefly about
Mono backports, and he was OK with the idea, since no big mono changes have
occurred.

Maybe we'll get that started soon.

On 11/13/05, Sebastian Dröge <mail at slomosnail.de> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I wanted to get banshee backported to breezy... but this needs
> libipoddevice and ipod-sharp beeing backported too.
>
> The problem now is, that ipod-sharp needs monodoc 1.1.9 which in turn
> needs xsp 1.1.9 which in turn needs mono 1.1.9.
> ipod-sharp needs monodoc for a documentation package which was disabled
> in breezy but I see no way how to disable it for breezy backports and
> let it enabled for dapper from the same sourcepackage. Is it possible to
> use a modified sourcepackage for a backport or _must_ it be the dapper
> one?
>
> Bye
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQBDd1OaBsBdh1vkHyERAqWmAKCGsHlC+4d3vwk7Sq4HdR6WeknTVQCfc8dZ
> z7hsPdNNrPt/S+ICdYZoZb0=
> =0+SF
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
> --
> ubuntu-backports mailing list
> ubuntu-backports at lists.ubuntu.com
> http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-backports/attachments/20051113/0cd26f22/attachment-0001.htm