Backports Forum "Triage"

(1) User files into REQUEST

(2) Knowledgeable user checks over request, that it's in Dapper and nothing
crazy (gtk, kernel, GNOME, etc)

(3) Moved into ACCEPTED or DEFERRED/INVALID

A build is attempted... If it succeeds, James Troup is told to add it to the
archvies and the thread is moved to CLOSED. Else, DEFERRED/INVALID

On 11/10/05, Chris Peterman <c.peterman at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> How should requests be handled on the Backports Request forum? Like I
> know someone requested something that was in Dapper, should I go ahead
> and say "accepted"? Or check to see if it builds in PBuilder first?
> --
> Chris Peterman <C.Peterman at gmail.com>
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQBDc6W9X41hkg8aZjkRAu7pAKCJ8qzvA88r/DHr06VjPRsQe6qXPACdFbnK
> 7pFOaPuFCuv/MAEB6Rjw5GA=
> =sMCg
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
> --
> ubuntu-backports mailing list
> ubuntu-backports at lists.ubuntu.com
> http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-backports/attachments/20051110/a77348e0/attachment.htm