VLC and Mono Backports

Yea yea. Its been a long week full of exams ;P

Anyway I doubled checked. Builds clean in Breezy PBuilder w/o
modifications to the source

~ Chris


On Fri, 2005-11-04 at 22:31 -0500, John Dong wrote:
> Uhh, source changes (or more importantly, lack thereof) is a key
> criterion for acceptance into official Backports :).
> 
> You might wanna try harder to remember.
> 
> On 11/4/05, Chris Peterman <c.peterman at gmail.com> wrote:
>         Not that I can remember
>         
>         
>         ~ Chris
>         
>         On Sat, 2005-11-05 at 00:16 +0000, Martin Meredith wrote:
>         > No changes needed?
>         >
>         > Chris Peterman wrote:
>         > > Bingo :P
>         > >
>         > > Actually I posted my results on the VLC package on the
>         Backports Forum 
>         > > and suddenly got swamped for requests that I couldn't
>         handle due to my
>         > > lack of webspace. I sent a few out via email, but yah,
>         people want
>         > > this ;P
>         > >
>         > > ~ Chris
>         > >
>         > > PS. Its done the right way, up to date Breezy PBuilder +
>         Dapper
>         > > Sources ;D
>         > >
>         > > On Fri, 2005-11-04 at 19:01 -0500, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>         > >
>         > >>On 11/4/05, Martin Meredith < mez at ubuntu.com> wrote:
>         > >>
>         > >>>Hey... the backports are normally built directly from the
>         distribution
>         > >>>backporting from ... so... no need to make the packages
>         really, just 
>         > >>>test they build properly... plus we have tseng our
>         resident mono master
>         > >>>on board :D who's working with us to get that going
>         > >>>
>         > >>>Chris Peterman wrote: 
>         > >>>
>         > >>>>I have VLC (0.8.4-svn20051025-0ubuntu1) and Mono
>         (1.1.9.2-1ubuntu1)
>         > >>>>ready to backport if you are accepting packages from
>         people not on the
>         > >>>>team 
>         > >>
>         > >>Both versions of the packages Chris mentioned are in
>         dapper, so I
>         > >>assume he took the source packages from dapper and tried
>         to to build
>         > >>in breezy and it worked. 
>         > >>
>         > >>--
>         > >>regards,
>         > >>    Reinhard
>         > >>
>         > >>
>         >
>         
>         
>         -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>         Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
>         
>         iD8DBQBDbCOgX41hkg8aZjkRAmd1AKCLVcjWW6rTkQ/xOZoVi/sC6y7EHQCgiJDa 
>         xz63/oQJ9S3SNDHqVFmkTVU=
>         =/806
>         -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>         
>         
>         --
>         ubuntu-backports mailing list
>         ubuntu-backports at lists.ubuntu.com
>         http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
>         
>         
> 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-backports/attachments/20051105/40842d3d/attachment.pgp