Stephan Hermann
sh at sourcecode.de
Tue Nov 1 10:09:45 CST 2005
Hey John,
well...I was just thinking about the future ,-)
Wasn't there a BOF which should discuss point releases of gnome or kde
as "dapper-updates"?
Regards,
\sh
Am Dienstag, den 01.11.2005, 10:56 -0500 schrieb John Dong:
> To the Developers listening in (or being spammed to listen in ;-) ):
>
> What do you feel about \sh's suggestion of "upgrading gnome or kde"?
>
> Surely that'll take kdelibs or libgnome*, qt/gtk updates and such
> upward dependencies.
>
> On 11/1/05, Stephan Hermann <sh at sourcecode.de> wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> Am Montag, den 31.10.2005, 11:29 -0600 schrieb Travis
> Watkins:
> > On 10/31/05, John Dong <jdong at ubuntu.com> wrote:
> > > Give us some more information -- what's the error message?
> We aren't
> > > psychic.
> > >
> >
> > There is no error, he just wants to get new apps and such
> without
> > upgrading his entire distro. Personally I'd rather get all
> the new
> > features of GNOME and etc and upgrade but he seems to be
> stuck in his
> > ways. He is threatening to go back to windows to try to get
> us to give
> > him what he wants. I say let him go, we don't need greedy
> > manipulators.
>
> First of all, I think it's quite ok to ask for "new stuff" in
> hoary.
> If it's possible to upgrade gnome or kde via ubuntu-backports
> let's do
> it.
> If it's too much efford, because of new things in gnome, which
> is
> requiring a new toolchain etc. then you should not backport
> the new
> crack.
> But annoying people to name them "greedy manipulators" is not
> a good
> idea. Better to stop hitting the reply button to those mails
> then.
>
> Regards,
>
> \sh
>
>
> --
> ubuntu-backports mailing list
> ubuntu-backports at lists.ubuntu.com
> http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
>
More information about the ubuntu-backports
mailing list