hoary-backports vs. packages.ubuntu.com

[Martin Meredith]

It would be useful yes,

you'll have to ask mdz



Michael R Head wrote:
> What would need to be done to add the official hoary-backports package
> information to packages.ubuntu.com? 
> 
> The packages site is a very valuable resource for me and would become
> several times more useful if backports could be added to it...
> 
> mike
> 
> 

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 256 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-backports/attachments/20050807/1029cef9/signature.pgp