<div dir="ltr">first, it's better to not use betas as your OS. second, the only issue in the bootloader is for very advanced multi linus OS installs (the installer always formats /boot) </div><div class="gmail_extra"> <div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 2:24 PM, David <<a href="mailto:agora@justemail.net" target="_blank">agora@justemail.net</a>> wrote: <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"> Hi, I am interested in installing 12.10 [rather than 12.04] on one drive of a computer in which a second drive has Windows (for the rare occasions when I use Windows) on it. I am a bit apprehensive after reading this review: <a href="http://arstechnica.com/business/2012/11/review-ubuntu-12-10-quantal-quetzal-a-mix-of-promise-pain/" target="_blank">http://arstechnica.com/business/2012/11/review-ubuntu-12-10-quantal-quetzal-a-mix-of-promise-pain/</a> which says that there is a problem in installation of the bootloader (see section "Installer crazy") which requires a work-around. Have any of you had this difficulty in installation of 12.10 ? The copy I have is on a Linux magazine's DVD, called 'Ubuntu 12.10 beta 2'. Thanks Dave -- ubuntu-au mailing list <a href="mailto:ubuntu-au@lists.ubuntu.com">ubuntu-au@lists.ubuntu.com</a> <a href="https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-au" target="_blank">https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-au</a> </blockquote></div> </div>