Team Appointment Process - Poll

[Ubuntu Lists]

On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 04:08:26 -0700 (PDT)
bwright <bwright.au at gmail.com> wrote:

> How long do we want to hold up decisions. Are we just going to sit
> here complaining about a voting system into the next year and have 0%
> productivity 

isn't that the standard outcome of the democratic process? (little
progress and lots of opinion.)

> or are we going to do something.

I don't understand the negative attitude to the meritocracy concept in
this group. Do something. If done well people will help and follow. If
done badly it will die or fork - in which case the process starts
again. 

> I have noticed the
> active participants are voting and the active members are the ones
> that get the choice. If you are not an active member or you do not
> wish to vote you will simply not be counted since you are not
> participating. It is your choice.

If I recall correctly, the number of members in 2010 quoted in the
notification that the AU-LoCo was not "re-endorsed" was something like
14. The all time high was what? 64?

64 people should be able to resolve the situation where there is a
single spokesperson and people who are doing good stuff can continue
to do good stuff. 18 people to represent 14 is kingdom building gone
mad.

-- 
jmo