less talk more action

[Tony "H.G" Candito]

Sorry, I thought it was a reply based on the multiple quotes taken from the
original message, including the contextual relevance of the entire email in
general.
Let's focus on my top-posting though, it eats the relevance of anything I
say based purely on user preference, and that's a real priority for us here,
I think.

On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 8:33 PM, Dave Hall <dave.hall at skwashd.com> wrote:

> On Tue, 2010-04-13 at 20:20 +1000, Tony "H.G" Candito wrote:
> > Why is this a separate email? Why didn't you just hit reply under the
> > relevant message?
>
> It wasn't a reply to any particular message in that thread it was a
> general comment on the discussion.
>
> A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
> Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
> A: Top-posting.
> Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
>
> Cheers
>
> Dave
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-au/attachments/20100413/ab49347d/attachment.htm