[SLUG] Firewall Distributions, Questions.

[Paul Gear]

Dave Kempe wrote:
> Dave Hall wrote:
>   
>> It depends on what you want.  If you want to have be able to scale up to
>> multiple WANs, have complex QoS and routing or failover clustering, then
>> I would suggest pfSense.  
>>
>>
>>   
>>     
> we use shorewall with multiple WANs, complex QoS and routing and 
> failover clustering.
> Its all possible, and you don't have get stuck in BSD land :)
And we wouldn't want that!

"BSD - It's just Linux, for old guys"
    -- me

Paul
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-au/attachments/20090306/e00831af/attachment.htm 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: paul.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 203 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-au/attachments/20090306/e00831af/attachment.vcf 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 4646 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-au/attachments/20090306/e00831af/attachment.bin