[OT] Optus: Why does cutting a cable bring down the entire network?
Bevin Watson
bevin_watson at optusnet.com.au
Fri Jul 18 23:19:31 BST 2008
I really don't care so much about the redundancy. I'm comfortable that
2 failures severed the link from Queensland to NSW. I just don't
understand why that also severed links within Queensland. It makes me
think we're not using an internet, it is just a series of pipes.
On Fri, 2008-07-18 at 10:34 +1000, Morgan Storey wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> We are pretty good, most of our connections aren't overly exposed
> (Some are underground all the way till they are out to sea) or are
> remote enough not to matter.
> There was mention of this in a podcast on secthis.com recently as to
> how vulnerable the USA's connections coming in are, there are about 14
> connections, and they are mostly secured by a simple chain-link fence.
> There locations are well known and easily accessable. Take these 14
> down and the USA is cut off from the rest of the world communication
> wise. This could be incredibly financially crippling for the US
> economy.
>
>
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
> Comment: http://getfiregpg.org
>
> iD8DBQFIf+UIvNAHEzzZc9cRAnn3AKCc1eaLwEvgi0v/1g5fiJqJe/2+8ACgn2vL
> RY65VWDE7jm9ZZdHvIWVQ1k=
> =6h4e
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 9:47 AM, Null Ack <nullack at gmail.com> wrote:
> Good insights there gents.
>
> This has me wondering how Australia's internet infrastructure
> is
> vulnerable to terrorist attack. Imagine the damage that could
> be done.
>
> Unlike countries like the US, we obviously dont have the huge
> conglomeration of backbone networks that would make a similar
> attack
> far more isolated.
>
> --
>
> ubuntu-au mailing list
> ubuntu-au at lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-au
>
>
>
>
> --
> Regards
> Morgan Storey,A+, MCSE:Security.
> Senior Network and Security Consultant.
>
>
More information about the ubuntu-au
mailing list