<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> <html> <head> <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type"> </head> <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff"> Thanks Thorsten. On 17/11/10 09:20, Thorsten Wilms wrote: <blockquote cite="mid:1289985641.2101.24.camel@charly" type="cite"> <pre wrap="">On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 08:17 +0000, Ivanka Majic wrote: </pre> <blockquote type="cite"> <pre wrap="">The wiki page is somewhat off the mark but I didn't want to edit without discussing with you why. When might you be available for an IRC chat? </pre> </blockquote> <pre wrap=""> The LP report: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://bugs.launchpad.net/buttons/+bug/673488">https://bugs.launchpad.net/buttons/+bug/673488</a> <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/Specs/Request-4">https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/Specs/Request-4</a> seems to ask for the design of a screenshots.ubuntu.com service from scratch, but the site exists already and I assume it's fully functional(?). </pre> </blockquote> Indeed. <blockquote cite="mid:1289985641.2101.24.camel@charly" type="cite"> <pre wrap=""> The code exists, the site runs, the interaction is given (?). What's open is layout and styling. </pre> </blockquote> Yes. <blockquote cite="mid:1289985641.2101.24.camel@charly" type="cite"> <pre wrap=""> Unclear points from the report: Why would we want to reflect the relationship between Debian and Ubuntu here? </pre> </blockquote> This was something I put in because I don't know enough about the current site and, if I had the time to pick this up I would discuss it with the person who hosts the site. There is obviously a reason that the debian branding is currently present so I wouldn't want to presume it can simply be removed. At no point in the Launchpad bug do I suggest that this is a Canonical site. We are happily using the current site for the screenshots in the Software Centre. It would be great if the site itself were given some design assistance. Richard Lee, on my team, has been looking at the implications of simply applying available css as a first pass. Separately, I think it would be enormously beneficial to the project and the apps available on the platform if we could encourage more screenshots - which is why I suggested a campaign of some sort - but, if we are looking at the site to apply visual updates this might be a good opportunity to review the upload user experience and see if there are any improvements to be made. Ivanka <blockquote cite="mid:1289985641.2101.24.camel@charly" type="cite"> <pre wrap=""> </pre> </blockquote> <div class="moz-signature">-- Ivanka Majić Creative Strategy Lead Canonical Design Team m: 07968704460 e: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:ivanka.majic@canonical.com">ivanka.majic@canonical.com</a> This email was sent using <a href="http://www.mozillamessaging.com/thunderbird/">Thunderbird</a> on <a href="http://www.ubuntu.com/">Ubuntu</a>. </div> </body> </html>