<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/strict.dtd"><html><head><meta name="qrichtext" content="1" /><style type="text/css">p, li { white-space: pre-wrap; }</style></head><body style=" font-family:'DejaVu Sans'; font-size:9pt; font-weight:400; font-style:normal;">On Saturday 28 March 2009 17:21:50 Saleel wrote: > Cory K. wrote: > > I don't mean to be a pain at all I just mean to get you thinking a > > little to ask different questions that don't make it appear as though we > > on this list are bound by any guidelines Canonical puts out. ;) > > After consideration, you are right. So then the question becomes: Do we > as a community want to work on art involving a specific and new common > palette? I think that we should, working from a common pallet may help > bring forward the strength and weakness of certain color schemes. It > would also give the end user something fresh, but unified to look at > upon installation. > > > In the end, I would bet they aren't even sure what they're doing quite > > yet. > > God I hope not. We started working on Karmic a few weeks ago and work is going well. Please understand that we are also still releasing Jaunty. At this time I can't say when we will have information available but know that we are working on it and it is coming. -- Ken</body></html>