<div class="gmail_quote">2009/3/28 Kenneth Wimer <<a href="mailto:kwwii@ubuntu.com">kwwii@ubuntu.com</a>> <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> <div style="font-family: 'DejaVu Sans'; font-size: 9pt; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal;"><div class="im">On Saturday 28 March 2009 17:21:50 Saleel wrote: > Cory K. wrote: > > I don't mean to be a pain at all I just mean to get you thinking a > > little to ask different questions that don't make it appear as though we > > on this list are bound by any guidelines Canonical puts out. ;) > > After consideration, you are right. So then the question becomes: Do we > as a community want to work on art involving a specific and new common > palette? I think that we should, working from a common pallet may help > bring forward the strength and weakness of certain color schemes. It > would also give the end user something fresh, but unified to look at > upon installation. > > > In the end, I would bet they aren't even sure what they're doing quite > > yet. > > God I hope not. </div>We started working on Karmic a few weeks ago and work is going well. Please understand that we are also still releasing Jaunty. At this time I can't say when we will have information available but know that we are working on it and it is coming. -- Ken</div> -- ubuntu-art mailing list <a href="mailto:ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com">ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com</a> <a href="https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art" target="_blank">https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art</a> </blockquote></div>Its called karmic koala? I was hoping to call it kool koala -- Ubuntu FTW!