I think just by slotting in the word 'community' into the definition, you're already implying that you aren't affiliated with Ubuntu officially, and have no decision making power in regards to the default theme. This is my immediate reaction when I see the term 'community' theme. i.e. * A team that creates additional community art for Ubuntu (to become an aesthetically satisfying OS?) Alex <div>On 11/09/2008, SzerencseFia <<a href="mailto:szerencsefia@gmail.com">szerencsefia@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> Cory K. wrote: > There really is no proper definition on this. > > So in the interest of defining that, here are my thoughts. > > What we are not: > >     * A team that creates art for the default of Ubuntu. > > > What we are/should be: > >     * A team that creates artwork for community packages to be released >       in the repos or on disk (not default) as disk size permits. > > > Anyone have issue with the above? > > What do *you* think the definition of the art team is/should be? *If* > your idea is to make default art, that's not on the table. Now the > definition I'm trying to get down to should be simple. 1 or 2 sentences. > What comes out of this discussion will be the official definition of the > team. So think well about it. :) > > > -Cory K. > > What we and our purpose are/should be: Ubuntu Art Team is an Art Community that helps Ubuntu to become an aesthetically satisfying OS whether any of the team's theme shall be default or not. Cheers, Erno -- ubuntu-art mailing list <a href="mailto:ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com">ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com</a> <a href="https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art">https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art</a> </blockquote></div>