According to a comment on <a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2007/11/16/droid-sans-mono-a-sw.html#comment-83140">this blog post</a>, the droid fonts are, in fact, not free. So whether they look good or not is beside the point, as they cannot be included due to licensing restrictions.<br> <br>Smartboy<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 4:01 AM, Kido Mariano <<a href="mailto:greasedbolt@gmail.com">greasedbolt@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> <div class="Ih2E3d">On Sat, 2008-07-05 at 23:21 -0400, Cory K. wrote:<br> > Here's a detailed post about the Droid font.<br> ><br> > <a href="http://troy-sobotka.blogspot.com/2008/07/why-droid-isnt-answer.html" target="_blank">http://troy-sobotka.blogspot.com/2008/07/why-droid-isnt-answer.html</a><br> ><br> <br> </div>About this one...<br> <br> I'd agree with the first point. :] However, your UI font won't appear as<br> large paragraphs all the time. As phrases, the font looks nice. IMO it's<br> better than what we have now.<br> <br> The rest of the points aren't quite related to Droid Sans being the UI<br> font. Droid Serif shouldn't be our main *print* serif font since it's<br> meant for screen use, too. It's quite easier to read, though, if that<br> matters. (I think Liberation Serif would be nice for this...)<br> <div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c"><br> <br> <br> <br> <br> --<br> ubuntu-art mailing list<br> <a href="mailto:ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com">ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com</a><br> <a href="https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art" target="_blank">https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art</a><br> </div></div></blockquote></div><br>