<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> <html> <head> <meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type"> </head> <body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000"> Personally I use the desktop to store three types of things (not just as a junk store) 1: Stuff that I'm working on at the moment (maybe a recently used files virtual folder on part of the desktop) 2: Stuff that I frequently need just after startup - links to applications which I only use in certain locations. 3: Files that I need rarely but when I do need don't want to have to go searching through my home folder for. So while it is a good idea to try and reduce the use of the desktop as a junk store there still needs to be the flexibility to use it as a normal folder if you wish (even if it needs to be enabled as an option) solar.george Travis Watkins wrote: <blockquote cite="mid:adca365a0802080346s42ab1341m2ec1dd2eaae3909c@mail.gmail.com" type="cite"> <pre wrap="">On Feb 8, 2008 5:01 AM, Andrew Laignel <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:a.laignel@ukdotcafe.com"><a.laignel@ukdotcafe.com></a> wrote: </pre> <blockquote type="cite"> <pre wrap="">Here's an idea, and something I have been wanting for a long time... Get rid of the 'Desktop' as a file store - remove it from the directory hierarchy! The only reason to store something on the desktop is if you can't be bothered to put it where it's meant to go. Ideally everything should be in the home folder, rather than split across a locations. Everything else - shortcuts, pseudo-icons could remain but only if handled by the system in an organised fashion ala Mac OS (drives and folders down RHS). The mixing of shortcuts, files, and system icons is generally a bad idea as you don't know whats what largely. Generally most desktops are just an ugly mess. If you remove the desktop-as-a-junkstore paradigm that everyone always does because everyone's always done it it opens up many new opportunities for using the desktop as an actual interface rather than the reliance on toolbars. It would also make a more intuitive system as you have more space to work with (as it will hide behind windows) so you are not constrained to 32px height restrictions. </pre> </blockquote> <pre wrap=""> Actually, the desktop effectively does not exist exactly because it is covered almost all the time. This is probably why people don't worry about using it as a junk store, they never see it unless they're diving in there to get something anyway. Kind of like the junk drawer on your real desk. :) </pre> <blockquote type="cite"> <pre wrap="">You could have multiple icons for various things that would expand out when hovered or clicked such as home folder, drives, places, software etc. You could shade all the controls or slide them out of the way when the desktop has no focus to prevent accidental clicks, and maybe slide the home folder out if someone does try to drag something to the desktop to make it obvious that's not where it goes. I've done a quick mockup of what I think would improve on the GUI. Obviously it's not perfect but there may be some good ideas there. With all the effort being spent on all the other areas of Ubuntu, more should be spent on the interface. -- ubuntu-art mailing list <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com">ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com</a> <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art">https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art</a> </pre> </blockquote> <pre wrap=""> </pre> </blockquote> </body> </html>