That's a good point. I hadn't really even been thinking about the icons (more the widgets), but they definitely also need visual integration.<br><br>Should we make a list of what needs to be done to have a working theme on the wiki page? Would it be worthwhile to start from any of the themes I've linked to already?
<br><br>Wes<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 11/21/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">Kenneth Wimer</b> <<a href="mailto:kwwii@oxygen-icons.org">kwwii@oxygen-icons.org</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
On Tuesday 21 November 2006 23:12, Wes Morgan wrote:<br>> Kenneth,<br>><br>> Great! Your help will be most appreciated.<br>><br>> Here's what I'm thinking on your KDE 3 vs. 4 question:<br>><br>> The point of this spec is mainly to make sure that Qt/KDE apps running in
<br>> Ubuntu (GNOME) look and feel exactly like GNOME/GTK apps (or as close as we<br>> can get). So, it seems like we need both a Qt/KDE 3 version and a Qt/KDE 4<br>> version. Because there are many (binary) apps out there that are Qt
<br>> 3-based, and more and more that are Qt 4-based, not to mention the<br>> impending KDE-wide shift to Qt 4 with the upcoming release of KDE 4. But<br>> even when that comes out, it would still be nice to support the older Qt
<br>> 3-based apps with this theme.<br>><br>> I would think we should start with Qt/KDE 3 (at least for the feisty cycle)<br>> and then we can focus on Qt/KDE 4 (in the feisty cycle too, if there's<br>> time, feisty+1 if not, since I would imagine that Kubuntu feisty+1 will be
<br>> a KDE 4 system).<br>><br>> Does that seem right?<br>><br><br>Yepp. It sounds great. In the end it depends on the amount of work one wants<br>to put into something :-)<br><br>I hope that we can continue this discussion. From the KDE side, it is also a
<br>goal to use consistent icons in gnome apps running under kde. In the end,<br>working on this will help both projects, so I am all for it :-)<br><br>Bye,<br>Ken<br><br>> Wes<br>><br>> On 11/21/06, Kenneth Wimer <
<a href="mailto:kwwii@bootsplash.org">kwwii@bootsplash.org</a>> wrote:<br>> > On Tuesday 21 November 2006 22:28, Wes Morgan wrote:<br>> > > Great. The first thing we need then, is a Qt theme that closely
<br>> ><br>> > resembles<br>> ><br>> > > Human GTK. Any out there experienced with Qt theming that can assist me<br>> > > with this? I'm thinking we can start with some of the attempts that
<br>> > > have been made already and polish them up a bit. (See wiki page for<br>> > > links)<br>> ><br>> > I can help. I did the Kubuntu artwork for the last two releases and I'm<br>> > deeply
<br>> > involved with KDE and KDE artwork (not to mention that I did all the art<br>> > for<br>> > SuSE for 7 years).<br>> ><br>> > There are still several open questions...is this for kde3 or kde4 or
<br>> > both? KDE<br>> > is migrating to the xdg icon naming spec for kde4, so it might be a lot<br>> > less<br>> > work to worry about kde4 and try to get things right for that before<br>> > making
<br>> > something for the short term. Then again, maybe it would be nice to have<br>> > something right away, while still working on the future...<br>> ><br>> > > Is there a Kubuntu art list that I should be cross-posting this to?
<br>> ><br>> > Nope, this is the one and only art list for *buntu (although I have often<br>> > thought that it might help to have a list for Kubuntu artwork alone as it<br>> > might help the Kubuntu art community).
<br>> ><br>> ><br>> > Bye,<br>> > Ken<br>> ><br>> > > Wes<br>> > ><br>> > > On 11/19/06, Mark Shuttleworth <<a href="mailto:mark@canonical.com">mark@canonical.com
</a>> wrote:<br>> > > > Wes Morgan wrote:<br>> > > ><br>> > > > The spec is here:<br>> > > > <a href="https://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+spec/human-theme-for-qt-and-kde">
https://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+spec/human-theme-for-qt-and-kde</a><br>> > > ><br>> > > > What do you folks think of this? Where should I go next to get the<br>> ><br>> > ball<br>
> ><br>> > > > rolling? I'm hoping to get something in place for feisty+1. Feel free<br>> ><br>> > to<br>> ><br>> > > > rip that wiki page to shreds with questions, comments, rants,
<br>> ><br>> > whatever.<br>> ><br>> > > > :)<br>> > > ><br>> > > > You're following exactly the right process: spec, discuss, implement.<br>> ><br>> > For
<br>> ><br>> > > > the implementation phase, you might want to meet up (online :-)) with<br>> > > > some of the MOTU team, to talk about getting the pieces packaged that<br>> ><br>> > you
<br>> ><br>> > > > need. If you can do the packaging, they can sponsor the uploads till<br>> ><br>> > you<br>> ><br>> > > > are approved as an uploader yourself.<br>> > > >
<br>> > > > Mark<br></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>"Small acts of humanity amid the chaos of inhumanity provide hope. But small acts are insufficient."<br><br>- Paul Rusesabagina, Rwandan and former hotel manager whose actions inspired the movie Hotel Rwanda