Mediawiki is a lot better ! ( example : <a href="http://ubuntuguide.org">ubuntuguide.org</a> ) Or forums but that idea seems to be kinda rejected :) Cheers <div>2006/9/7, Nathan Eckenrode < <a href="mailto:neckenrode@gmail.com">neckenrode@gmail.com</a>>:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">There is some interesting work happening over here at <a href="http://kollabor8.toegristle.com/">http://kollabor8.toegristle.com/</a> I am not certain of the software which is being used , but I think that this is the sort of idea that you are looking for. On Wednesday 06 September 2006 12:40, Mark Shuttleworth wrote: > The thread on shifting to the Forums made me think a little about the > value of good supporting tools. > > The wiki is absolutely not optimal for a lot of what the artwork team > needs to do. For example, there is just no support for revisioning > *images* over time. I would like to be able to watch a collaborative > "thread" of work, with people publishing their art and being able to > review the history of a particular piece. We can't do this in the wiki. > > Does anyone know if there is a free software (or even proprietary!) web > based CMS for artwork collaboration? > > Mark -- ubuntu-art mailing list <a href="mailto:ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com"> ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com</a> <a href="https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art">https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art</a> </blockquote></div>