Mark Shuttleworth <mark@canonical.com> wrote:<blockquote class="replbq" style="border-left: 2px solid rgb(16, 16, 255); margin-left: 5px; padding-left: 5px;"> <meta content="text/html;charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type"> Can I suggest we change the format of the nominations page? It should be like this, with the themes alphabetically sorted: Theme name in Bold � o Screenshot link � o Screenshot link � o Screenshot link � Name of icon theme, metacity theme, widget theme, and wallpaper. � Brief one paragraph description of the theme giving the basic rationale for its inclusion and a neutral commentary on coverage and style. � Billy VC: I think that this is a bad nomination because.... � Frank S: Yes but I like this because.... � Other team member: my opinion is.... Next theme name in bold... Etc This way we can aggregate theme descriptions, details, screenshots AND COMMENTS in one plage on the page. Mark </blockquote>Sounds better, but that doesn't solve the internal/external issue. May I suggest; Theme name in Bold (internal) Why only five? I'm just curious. The current internal alone has 8, not including clearlooks. Since including the old Human is just simply a good idea, that brings it down to 4. Very thin, and not must of a choice, IMO. BTW: disregard my comment earlier about gperfection2 being proprietary :/ Billy <hr size=1>New Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. <a href="http://us.rd.yahoo.com/mail_us/taglines/postman5/*http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=39666/*http://messenger.yahoo.com">Call regular phones from your PC</a> and save big.