[ubuntu-art] Karmic Questions
John Baer
baerjj at gmail.com
Sat Mar 28 17:16:28 GMT 2009
On Sat, 2009-03-28 at 16:29 +0000 Kenneth Wimer wrote:
> Message: 11
> Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 17:29:51 +0100
> From: Kenneth Wimer <kwwii at ubuntu.com>
> Subject: Re: [ubuntu-art] Karmic Questions.
> To: ubuntu-art at lists.ubuntu.com
> Message-ID: <200903281729.51818.kwwii at ubuntu.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> On Saturday 28 March 2009 17:21:50 Saleel wrote:
> > Cory K. wrote:
> > > I don't mean to be a pain at all I just mean to get you thinking a
> > > little to ask different questions that don't make it appear as
> though we
> > > on this list are bound by any guidelines Canonical puts out. ;)
> >
> > After consideration, you are right. So then the question becomes: Do
> we
> > as a community want to work on art involving a specific and new
> common
> > palette? I think that we should, working from a common pallet may
> help
> > bring forward the strength and weakness of certain color schemes. It
> > would also give the end user something fresh, but unified to look
> at
> > upon installation.
> >
> > > In the end, I would bet they aren't even sure what they're doing
> quite
> > > yet.
> >
> > God I hope not.
>
> We started working on Karmic a few weeks ago and work is going well.
> Please
> understand that we are also still releasing Jaunty. At this time I
> can't say
> when we will have information available but know that we are working
> on it and
> it is coming.
>
> --
> Ken
Ken,
What is the desire for submissions that missed the cut? My thoughts are
to push them to gnome-look and its sibling sites. Although designed with
Ubuntu in mind they may add value to other open source projects. :)
It would have been nice to see some items land in community-themes but
that effort did not bear fruit. As you plan for Karmic that should be a
topic for discussion.
John
More information about the ubuntu-art
mailing list