[ubuntu-art] [Wormhole Theme]A Light Theme - Wiki and Download

[Paul Gupta]

I also dislike branded wallpaper, I feel as though Ubuntu will be 
distinctly Ubuntu without branding of the wallpaper. (Gnome or KDE panel 
logos)

Paul

Smartboy wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 1:16 PM, Lloyd Kuhnle <lloydkuhnle at yahoo.com 
> <mailto:lloydkuhnle at yahoo.com>> wrote:
> 
>     Very nice artwork, but perhaps, somewhere in the corner, the word
>     UBUNTU may want to be visible.
> 
>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     *From:* Giuseppe Pennisi <giupenni78 at gmail.com
>     <mailto:giupenni78 at gmail.com>>
>     *To:* Discussion on Ubuntu artwork <ubuntu-art at lists.ubuntu.com
>     <mailto:ubuntu-art at lists.ubuntu.com>>
>     *Sent:* Sunday, January 18, 2009 4:07:14 PM
>     *Subject:* [ubuntu-art] [Wormhole Theme]A Light Theme - Wiki and
>     Download
> 
>     I have made a wiki page of the theme and archive (gtkrc + metacity
>     files) to try it.
> 
>     I fixed some problem but it is still a Alpha.
> 
>     For preview, more info, download and try the theme:
>     https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/Incoming/Jaunty/Wormhole
> 
>     Opinions about my work?
> 
>     What do you think?
> 
>     ( If someone wants to partecipate or help to improve the theme is
>     welcomed. :-) )
> 
>     gp
> 
>     PS: at the moment I used Murrine-SVN of the Intrepid Repository...for
>     Jaunty I must used this or in the next release will we use the latest
>     Murrine Engine? I think clarify this point is very important.
>     In my opinion is better if we can use in Jaunty the latest svn version
>     of murrine.
> 
> 
> 
> 
>     -- 
>     ubuntu-art mailing list
>     ubuntu-art at lists.ubuntu.com <mailto:ubuntu-art at lists.ubuntu.com>
>     https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
> 
>     --
>     ubuntu-art mailing list
>     ubuntu-art at lists.ubuntu.com <mailto:ubuntu-art at lists.ubuntu.com>
>     https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
> 
> 
> I disagree. I don't like branded wallpapers, and I haven't seen any 
> default wallpaper yet which was branded.
> 
> About the original email though: I like it now better. It looks a little 
> too flat for me (I like my stuff to look smooth, but not flat). LOVE the 
> wallpaper though. Looks great! :D
> 
> Smartboy
>