[ubuntu-art] Canonical's approach to Jaunty

[Adam]

On Wed, 2008-11-05 at 00:33 +0100, Kenneth Wimer wrote:

> On Wednesday 05 November 2008 00:30:50 Michael Stephenson wrote:
> > 2008/11/4 Adam <gusztee at gmail.com>
> >
> > >  rhythmbox and nautilus or totem, or openoffice which is the ugliest
> > > thing ever.
> >
> > What do people expect from totem? its a media player, it has a viewing
> > window play/pause, skip forwards and skip backwards and volume, how do you
> > jazz that up without adding meaningless crap?
> 
> waste less space, make it more usable and at the same time make it more 
> attractive (I'll admit that some of this means gtk and not totem, actually I 
> would put totem at the bottom of the "really needs work" list).
> 
> --
> Ken
> 

Thx Kenneth, thats kind of what i would have said.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-art/attachments/20081105/83242f56/attachment-0001.htm 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-art/attachments/20081105/83242f56/attachment-0001.pgp