[ubuntu-art] More Mockups

[Salane Ashcraft]

On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 8:45 PM, Michael McKinley <m.mckinley at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 6:29 PM, David <thecookieofdoom at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 7:03 PM, Salane Ashcraft <salane89 at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 5:57 PM, shadowh511 <shadow.h511 at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Jul 28, 2008, at 10:40 AM, Mario Viviani <mariux01 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Il giorno lun, 28/07/2008 alle 15.23 +0200, Duncan Austin ha scritto:
>>> >
>>> > New batch, I tried to get everyones ideas in here. The only thing I did
>>> > differently from the suggestions was the buttons, the gray background
>>> > to
>>> > them just made it all feel more "solid".
>>> >
>>> > http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y111/raraken/kin_piano_kith_r2.png
>>> > http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y111/raraken/kin_piano_clouds_r2.png
>>> > http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y111/raraken/kin_piano_rocks_r2.png
>>> >
>>> > http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y111/raraken/kin_piano_trnthtfrnupsddwn_r2.png
>>> >
>>> > aaand... The development SVG. One thing about the SVG is that it's
>>> > -very-
>>> > rough.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/Incoming/Intrepid/Kin_Intrepid?action=AttachFile&amp;do=get&amp;target=kin_piano_rev2.svg
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > How about something different for the buttons, since we're being
>>> > distinctive?
>>> >
>>> > Mockup here:
>>> >
>>> > http://www.readitsideways.com/kin_piano_grass_buttons.png
>>> >
>>> > Duncan
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Quite difficult to make them work, but i think it can be done. In
>>> > Emerald
>>> > it's easier than in metacity, so maybe someone can try making a working
>>> > candidate for them.. I think they're cool and original, but thinking
>>> > about
>>> > usability i have some doubts...
>>> >
>>> > Mario
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > ubuntu-art mailing list
>>> > ubuntu-art at lists.ubuntu.com
>>> > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
>>> >
>>> > Honestly, why is everyone wanting to use emerald?  It is as stable as
>>> > windows 95!
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > ubuntu-art mailing list
>>> > ubuntu-art at lists.ubuntu.com
>>> > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
>>> >
>>> >
>>> I think Compiz Fusion is the culprit - Beryl was so much more stable
>>> for me at least.
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Salane Ashcraft
>>> salane89 at gmail.com
>>>
>>> --
>>> ubuntu-art mailing list
>>> ubuntu-art at lists.ubuntu.com
>>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
>>
>> Have we considered Trying Jasper? (trying not to top post, please let me
>> know if I'm doing something wrong).
>
> You did it right :).  I think Jasper would be a good thing to keep an eye on
> for the future, but from what I've seen it's still in alpha/pre-alpha and
> thus isn't mature enough.
> --
> ubuntu-art mailing list
> ubuntu-art at lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
>
>


Has anyone thought of using murrine SVN for these? It supports transparency.
-- 
Salane Ashcraft
salane89 at gmail.com