[ubuntu-art] More Mockups

[shadowh511]

On Jul 28, 2008, at 10:40 AM, Mario Viviani <mariux01 at gmail.com> wrote:

>
> Il giorno lun, 28/07/2008 alle 15.23 +0200, Duncan Austin ha scritto:
>>
>
>> New batch, I tried to get everyones ideas in here. The only thing I  
>> did differently from the suggestions was the buttons, the gray  
>> background to them just made it all feel more "solid".
>>
>> http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y111/raraken/kin_piano_kith_r2.png
>> http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y111/raraken/kin_piano_clouds_r2.png
>> http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y111/raraken/kin_piano_rocks_r2.png
>> http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y111/raraken/kin_piano_trnthtfrnupsddwn_r2.png
>>
>> aaand... The development SVG. One thing about the SVG is that it's - 
>> very- rough.
>>
>> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/Incoming/Intrepid/Kin_Intrepid?action=AttachFile&amp;do=get&amp;target=kin_piano_rev2.svg
>>
>>
>
>>
>> How about something different for the buttons, since we're being  
>> distinctive?
>>
>> Mockup here:
>>
>> http://www.readitsideways.com/kin_piano_grass_buttons.png
>>
>> Duncan
>>
>
> Quite difficult to make them work, but i think it can be done. In  
> Emerald it's easier than in metacity, so maybe someone can try  
> making a working candidate for them.. I think they're cool and  
> original, but thinking about usability i have some doubts...
>
> Mario
> -- 
> ubuntu-art mailing list
> ubuntu-art at lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
Honestly, why is everyone wanting to use emerald?  It is as stable as  
windows 95!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-art/attachments/20080728/d160caa6/attachment-0001.htm