julian at selectparks.net
Sat Apr 15 23:55:08 BST 2006
..on Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 11:38:13PM +0100, Mark Shuttleworth wrote:
> bvc wrote:
> > For consistency, the distributor-logo.png needs shadow.
> > http://kwh.kernow-gb.com/~bvc/dapper-xubu/distributor-logo.png
> > <http://kwh.kernow-gb.com/%7Ebvc/dapper-xubu/distributor-logo.png>
> Good point. But I wonder if the Ubuntu logo will ever look great that
> small? Maybe we should revert to the Gnome foot there? Thoughts?
i think it would be a bad idea to see the Ubuntu logo replaced by
the stock gnome foot in this location; a regression where branding is concerned.
this is a widely anticipated release of Ubuntu and so the logo should be
resolute and it's graphical presence strong.
IMO i think it still looks good with the shadowing - though is definitely softened
by it. regardless the Ubuntu logo is well designed and so it robust enough to take
this sort of treatment. blocks of strong colours will mean it survives small
sizes and shadowing well.
if push came to shove i'd rather roll back to the unshaded version than see a gnome's foot there.
_ _ _
___ ___| |___ __| |_ _ __ __ _ _ _| |__ ___
(_-</ -_) / -_) _| _| '_ \/ _` | '_| / /(_-<
/__/\___|_\___\__|\__| .__/\__,_|_| |_\_\/__/
More information about the ubuntu-art