[Bug 2058943] [NEW] t64: RM src:hkl and src:sardana

Launchpad Bug Tracker 2058943 at bugs.launchpad.net
Mon Mar 25 16:00:36 UTC 2024


You have been subscribed to a public bug by Simon Chopin (schopin):

Please remove src:hkl and src:sardana from noble
hkl is FTBFS and blocks the t64 glib2.0 transition. sardana is its only hard rdep.

It has been removed from Debian testing:
https://tracker.debian.org/news/1513984/hkl-removed-from-testing/

❯ check-removal sardana
### Source rdeps: reverse-depends -a source src:hkl
Reverse-Build-Depends-Indep
===========================
* sardana                       (for gir1.2-hkl-5.0)

### Binary rdeps: reverse-depends src:hkl
Reverse-Recommends
==================
* pan-control-systems           (for ghkl)
* pan-control-systems-dev       (for libhkl-dev)
* pan-diffraction               (for libhkl-dev)
* pan-diffraction               (for libhkl-doc)
* pan-diffraction               (for gir1.2-hkl-5.0)
* pan-diffraction               (for ghkl)
* science-dataacquisition       (for ghkl)
* science-physics               (for ghkl)

Reverse-Depends
===============
* python3-sardana               (for gir1.2-hkl-5.0)

Packages without architectures listed are reverse-dependencies in:
amd64, arm64, armhf, i386, ppc64el, s390x

### Seeded?: seeded-in-ubuntu hkl
Status unknown: No binary packages built by the latest hkl.

❯ check-removal sardana
### Source rdeps: reverse-depends -a source src:sardana
No reverse dependencies found

### Binary rdeps: reverse-depends src:sardana
Reverse-Recommends
==================
* pan-control-systems           (for python3-sardana)
* pan-control-systems-dev       (for python3-sardana)

Packages without architectures listed are reverse-dependencies in:
amd64, arm64, armhf, i386, ppc64el, s390x

### Seeded?: seeded-in-ubuntu sardana
sardana's binaries are not seeded.

** Affects: hkl (Ubuntu)
     Importance: Undecided
         Status: New

-- 
t64: RM src:hkl and src:sardana
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058943
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Package Archive Administrators, which is subscribed to the bug report.



More information about the ubuntu-archive mailing list