[Bug 2016553] [NEW] bowtie2: Please RM s390x binaries

[Launchpad Bug Tracker]

You have been subscribed to a public bug by Graham Inggs (ginggs):

Since 2.5.0-2, bowtie2 no longer builds on s390x.

Please remove the bowtie2 s390x binaries from lunar.

$ reverse-depends src:bowtie2
Reverse-Recommends
* med-bio                       (for bowtie2)
* med-cloud                     (for bowtie2)
* python3-seqcluster            (for bowtie2)
* ugene [amd64]                 (for bowtie2)

Reverse-Depends
* ariba [amd64 arm64 ppc64el]   (for bowtie2)
* gasic                         (for bowtie2)
* metaphlan                     (for bowtie2)
* metaphlan2-data               (for bowtie2)
* optimir                       (for bowtie2)
* paleomix [amd64 arm64]        (for bowtie2)
* plasmidid [amd64]             (for bowtie2)
* q2-quality-control            (for bowtie2)
* rsem [amd64 arm64 ppc64el s390x]
* srst2 [amd64 arm64 ppc64el s390x]
* trinityrnaseq [amd64 arm64]   (for bowtie2)
* unicycler [amd64]             (for bowtie2)

Packages without architectures listed are reverse-dependencies in:
amd64, arm64, armhf, i386, ppc64el, s390x

$ reverse-depends src:bowtie2 -a source
Reverse-Testsuite-Triggers
* unicycler                     (for bowtie2)

Reverse-Build-Depends
* ariba                         (for bowtie2)
* bcbio                         (for bowtie2)
* gasic                         (for bowtie2)
* metaphlan                     (for bowtie2)
* paleomix                      (for bowtie2)
* plasmidid                     (for bowtie2)
* q2-quality-control            (for bowtie2)
* qcumber                       (for bowtie2)
* rsem                          (for bowtie2)
* srst2                         (for bowtie2)
* trinityrnaseq                 (for bowtie2)
* unicycler                     (for bowtie2)

** Affects: bowtie2 (Ubuntu)
     Importance: Undecided
         Status: New


** Tags: update-excuse
-- 
bowtie2: Please RM s390x binaries
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2016553
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Package Archive Administrators, which is subscribed to the bug report.