Bug Triage - Friday 4th December

[Matthew Ruffell]

Hi Christian,

> Maybe when you go for adcli and sssd in LP #1868703 again - they might
> have their dependency to libsasl2-modules-gssapi-mit be versioned to
> be greater or equal the fixed cyrus_sasl2?

That is an excellent idea. I will do exactly that.

I have prepared a new debdiff for adcli which adds a dependency to
libsasl2-modules-gssapi-mit at the new upload version of
2.1.27~101-g0780600+dfsg-3ubuntu2.2.

https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/adcli/+bug/1906627/+attachment/5441872/+files/lp1906627_adcli_option_one.debdiff

Thanks for suggesting!

Matthew

On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 12:28 AM Christian Ehrhardt
<christian.ehrhardt at canonical.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 3:45 AM Matthew Ruffell
> <matthew.ruffell at canonical.com> wrote:
> >
> ...
> > Again, I apologise for the regression, and things are on their way to being
> > fixed.
>
> Thanks for jumping on it once it was identified.
>
> One suggestion for the coming related uploads.
> Do you think it would make sense to ensure that the now-known-bad
> combinations of packages won't be allowed together.
> Maybe when you go for adcli and sssd in LP #1868703 again - they might
> have their dependency to libsasl2-modules-gssapi-mit be versioned to
> be greater or equal the fixed cyrus_sasl2?
>
>
> > [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/adcli/+bug/1906627/+attachment/5441530/+files/lp1906627_cyrus_sasl2_bionic.debdiff
> > [2] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/adcli/+bug/1906627