[Bug 1729090] [NEW] RM boost1.63, never default 1.65.1 is in

Launchpad Bug Tracker 1729090 at bugs.launchpad.net
Tue Oct 31 22:42:38 UTC 2017


You have been subscribed to a public bug by Dimitri John Ledkov (xnox):

RM boost1.63, was not default 1.65.1 is in.


No reverse dpeneds, just itself on to itself, and one alternative build-dep.

$ reverse-depends src:boost1.63
Reverse-Depends
===============
* libboost-python1.63-dev       (for libboost1.63-dev)
* libboost-python1.63-dev       (for libboost-python1.63.0)
* libboost-random1.63.0         (for libboost-system1.63.0)
* libboost-wave1.63-dev         (for libboost-filesystem1.63-dev)
* libboost-wave1.63-dev         (for libboost-serialization1.63-dev)
* libboost-wave1.63-dev         (for libboost1.63-dev)
* libboost-wave1.63.0           (for libboost-system1.63.0)
* libboost-wave1.63.0           (for libboost-thread1.63.0)

Packages without architectures listed are reverse-dependencies in:
amd64, arm64, armhf, i386, ppc64el, s390x

$ reverse-depends -b src:boost1.63
Reverse-Build-Depends
=====================
* magics++                      (for libboost1.63-dev)


$ chdist apt-cache bionic showsrc magics++ | grep boost1.63
Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 10), dh-buildinfo, gfortran, cmake, chrpath, dh-python, swig, python-dev, python-numpy, python3-dev, python3-numpy, libhdf5-serial-dev | libhdf5-dev, libnetcdf-dev, libnetcdf-cxx-legacy-dev, libgl1-mesa-dev, libgd-dev, libemos-dev (>= 2:4.3.9), libgeotiff-dev, libeccodes-dev | libgrib-api-dev (>= 1.14.5-2), libeccodes-tools | libgrib-api-tools, libemos-bin, libopenjp2-7-dev, libaec-dev, libterralib-dev, libcairo2-dev, libpango1.0-dev, ttf-dejavu-core, libxml-parser-perl, ghostscript, zlib1g-dev, libboost-dev | libboost1.63-dev, libproj-dev, qtbase5-dev-tools, qtbase5-dev, qt5-qmake

Note the "libboost-dev | libboost1.63-dev"

** Affects: boost1.63 (Ubuntu)
     Importance: Undecided
         Status: New

-- 
RM boost1.63, never default 1.65.1 is in
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1729090
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Package Archive Administrators, which is subscribed to the bug report.



More information about the ubuntu-archive mailing list