[Bug 1643151] [NEW] Please remove sad pandas and friends

Launchpad Bug Tracker 1643151 at bugs.launchpad.net
Sat Nov 19 08:51:48 UTC 2016


You have been subscribed to a public bug by Graham Inggs (ginggs):

>From Debian bug #825103:

pandas is a popular package which other packages depend upon.  It also comes
with an extensive tests battery which I excercise  at package build time.
Unfortunately  that leads to FTBFs on many architectures for which upstream
doesn't provide support and so far I had no resources to support as well.

As was suggested by others (see Debian bug #824870), the easiest resolution ATM is simply
to remove pandas  for the architectures where it FTBFS, to allow it propagate
back to testing -- it is a solid package otherwise.

...

We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:

python-pandas-lib |   0.15.0-2 | mips, powerpc, s390x
python-pandas-lib | 0.15.1+git125-ge463818-1 | arm64, armel, armhf, mipsel
python3-pandas-lib |   0.15.0-2 | mips, powerpc, s390x
python3-pandas-lib | 0.15.1+git125-ge463818-1 | arm64, armel, armhf, mipsel

------------------- Reason -------------------
ROM; FTBFS on those archs, not supported by upstream, hoggs dependent packages

...

>From Debian bug: #840567:

We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:

python-statsmodels-lib |    0.6.1-8 | arm64, armel, armhf, mips, mipsel,
powerpc, s390x

------------------- Reason -------------------
ROM; dependency (pandas) is missing on those archs now

** Affects: pandas (Ubuntu)
     Importance: Undecided
         Status: New

** Affects: statsmodels (Ubuntu)
     Importance: Undecided
         Status: New

** Affects: pandas (Debian)
     Importance: Unknown
         Status: Unknown

** Affects: statsmodels (Debian)
     Importance: Unknown
         Status: Unknown


** Tags: ftbfs
-- 
Please remove sad pandas and friends
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1643151
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Package Archive Administrators, which is subscribed to the bug report.



More information about the ubuntu-archive mailing list